A Classification of Features for Interpersonal Disconnectivity in Digital Media
Article Overview
- Title: A Classification of Features for Interpersonal Disconnectivity in Digital Media: Block, Unfriend, Unfollow, Mute, Withhold, and Eject
- Author: Nicholas John (Department of Communication and Journalism, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel)
- Correspondence: n.john@huji.ac.il
- Submission and Publication Dates:
- Submitted: 19 May 2024
- Accepted: 2 September 2024
- Published: 10 October 2024
- Journal: Media and Communication, Volume 12, Article 8716
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8716
- Issue: Part of “Disconnectivity in a Changing Media and Political Landscape”
- Keywords: blocking, disconnection, disconnectivity, feature analysis, social media, unfollowing, unfriending
Abstract
- The article presents the first comprehensive classification and lexicon for features that dissolve interpersonal ties in digital environments, including the functions of blocking, unfriending, unfollowing, muting, withholding, and ejecting.
- Motivations:
- Existing analyses of social media features do not address features enabling interpersonal disconnectivity.
- Studies on interpersonal disconnectivity overlook the features that facilitate such actions.
- Contributions:
- Disambiguation of terminology for better analytical distinction between feature types.
- Addressing the ambiguity between filtering information and avoiding interpersonal interactions.
1. Introduction
- The article aims to classify features related to dissolving interpersonal ties in digital media for better analytical understanding.
- It underlines the inadequacies of social media feature analyses in addressing interpersonal disconnectivity.
- Posits critical questions regarding user intentions behind actions such as blocking and unfriending in light of social relationships in online contexts.
2. Features
- Definition of a Feature: Featured defined as a tool that enables user activity, which can impact both the user and their connections.
- Smock et al. (2011): “A technical tool on the site that enables activity on the part of the user.”
- Sajtos et al. (2022): “Platforms can be regarded as a collection of features.”
- Hasinoff and Bivens (2021): Defined features as functions that developers publicize or make visible to users.
- The significance of feature analysis is highlighted in examining social media interfaces and their implications on user behavior.
- Notable scholarly approaches include:
- Stanfill (2015): Advocated for a discursive interface analysis to evaluate site affordances and their cultural implications.
- Bivens: Focused on revealing normative assumptions preserved within social media designs.
- Highlighted the gap in existing literature related to features enabling interpersonal disconnectivity, termed as “forgotten features” by Weller (2016).
3. Interpersonal Disconnectivity
- There is a growing interest in the political and cultural implications of unfriending and similar behaviors on social media.
- Research has identified terminological inconsistencies surrounding these actions.
3.1 Definition Discrepancies
- Confusions defined between the terms "friends" and "followers" reflecting the one-directional versus mutual nature of relationships on social media systems.
- Different perspectives from researchers highlight overlapping concepts that obscure clarity and understanding.
4. Method
- Analyzed 37 social media platforms to catalog features related to interpersonal disconnectivity through documentation and system analysis.
- Identification of features based on definitions, usability, and service comparisons.
- Methodological approach aligned with a two-stage feature-level analysis akin to O’Riordan et al. (2016), creating a comprehensive dataset.
- Full documentation available via the Open Science Framework (OSF).
5. Findings
- Documented 52 distinct features, with a specific frequency of mention leading to key observations.
- Most Common Features:
- Block (57 mentions)
- Unfollow (27 mentions)
- Mute (14 mentions)
- Unfriend (12 mentions)
- Collective listing of features categorized into more general types, e.g., definitions of mute and unfriend based on documented usage across different platforms.
5.1. Blocking
- Core functionality designed to prevent communication, disallowing any interaction from the blocked party.
- Unique to platforms, blocking serves as a barrier to any future interactions and can also eliminate historical engagement.
5.2. Unfriending
- Predominantly recognized as dissolution of mutual ties; allows one party to sever the connection without mutual consent.
- Implications entail both parties losing access to each other's content, differing from blocking mechanisms.
5.3. Unfollowing
- The act of reversing the subscription-like relationship; does not influence the other party's content visibility.
5.4. Muting
- A form of disconnectivity that maintains ties but restricts the visibility of content.
- This function includes temporary actions (e.g., snoozing) and specialized options like Instagram's restrict feature.
5.5. Withhold
- The action of preventing content from reaching a designated follower's view.
- Serves to uphold barriers in content dissemination without actually severing interpersonal relationships.
5.6. Eject
- Involves severing the connection without eliminating the ability for the unfollowed party to see the ejected user's content unless restricted by privacy settings.
- Similarities with withholding yet highlights a deliberate disconnect through selective expulsion from follower lists.
6. Conclusions
- The classification aims to provide clarity over disconnectivity features in social media, establishing a consistent lexicon for further research.
- Emphasizes the need for ongoing exploration of the motivations behind the use of these disconnectivity features as they blend personal and content management.
- Sets a directional focus for future research on the integration of these features into user dynamics and community dialogues on social media, shaping expectations regarding user interaction and connection.