marriage test
CM Exam #2 Questions
Be prepared to answer any of the following questions below according to the course lectures:
1. Casti connubii: Identify two errors against each of the three goods of marriage and indicate the three remedies proposed by Pope Pius XI to overcoming these errors.
Against Three Goods of Marriage -
Children (mentality that children are a burden)
Contraception - frustrate the procreative
Abortion - murder of a conceived child
Conjugal fidelity (deny the monogamousness of marriage)
Polygamy - having many wives
Adultery - cheating
Sacrament
Divorce - bad for family and state
Trial marriage - move in and see if it works
Pre-nuptial agreements - against the permanence
Remedies -
Prayer and the sacraments (especially confession and the Eucharist)
Docility to the magisterium (be open to teachings)
Adequate marriage preparation with a focus on beauty and purpose within God’s plan (what it is for/about)
2. Explain the Church's position on artificial insemination (and be sure to make the necessary distinctions), and also explain the Church's position on in vitro fertilization, as well as five reasons for this position.
Artificial insemination -
When outside marriage = gravely evil
When within marriage but with a ‘donor’ = gravely evil
Heterologous artificial insemination
When within marriage with spouse = depends
Homologous artificial insemination
Must assist/supplement the conjugal act NOT replace it (not render mere sexual act)
Dignity of conjugal act and spouses must be preserved
Technically possible does NOT mean morally permissible
In-Vitro Fertilization -
Is an intrinsic evil = never okay
Separates the unitive and procreative meanings of the conjugal act
Promotes an abortion mentality (“spare” embryos are typically destroyed)
Child is deprived of right to be born of parents known to him/her
Treats child as a commodity to be demanded not as a gift received
Sperm is obtained immorally through masturbation
3. Provide some specific examples of the personalism evident in Gaudium et Spes as pertaining to marriage and family life; explain whether or not such language marks a departure from the Thomistic understanding of the ends of marriage; comment on the proper understanding of "spousal love" and whether it is a competing end of marriage.
Gaudium et Spes - Vatican II on marriage and family
Purpose of this section was to guard and teach the faith more effectively
Decided not to use “excommunication” language- chose to be more “pastoral”
The 4th pillar of vatican II-
Marriage and conjugal love are by nature ordered to the procreation and education of children. Indeed children are the supreme gift of marriage and greatly contribute to the good of the parents themselves.
Examples of personalism
There is a significance of referring to child as “bonum” (means good), and “donum” (which means gift). Vatican II sees children as gifts, which is more personalistic - does not depart from “bonum” but elevates it
Gaudium et spes does not use the terms “primary end” “secondary end” or “good of marriage” - not change in teachings - just switch to language to fit pastoral Vatican II
The home is referred to as the “domestic Church” - parents are the primary educators of their children much like a priest to his people
Terminology away from thomism to personalism
Thomism: unchanging laws of nature, very objective
Dangers of thomism: seeing the doctrine but not translating it to our lives
Personalism : human experience, subjective
Dangers of personalism: “its all about me!”
Must have a balance between the two- be grounded in dogma but also seen through the lens of human free will and experience
Some will say that personalism dropped Church teaching, when it really just used language that people will be able to understand and relate to
Role of conjugal or spousal love in marriage
It is not the competing “end” with children.
Also ordered towards procreation
Love is not a goal, it is presupposed
Conjugal love is the “form” of marriage- conjugal love animates marriage the way the soul animates the body
4. Provide the background leading up to the writing of Humanae vitae from the vantage point of the Commission put together by John XXIII and expanded by Paul VI that was tasked with studying the issue of population, the family and birth, and incorporate the relevant opinions of the synod of bishops who were invited to make known their views to Paul VI on these matters.
In 1963 Pope John XXIII called for a small commission (6 people) to advise him on the question of the birth control pill. Paul VI enlarged a commission to 70 people.
Two positions needed:
1.) Majority report- (90% of commission) Church needs to enlarge/change teaching, pro birth control pill - purposely leaked to the press.
Completely personalist not grounded in Thomism
Argued there was an overpopulation problem
Married people cannot be expected to practice chastity and discipline
2.) Minority report- (10%) Church should not and cannot change teaching
Paul VI reputed on 3 reposis for 2 years before issuing humanae vitae
On July 25, 1968
5. Explain the view of those who advocated for the "principle of totality;" explain Pope Paul VI's response to this principle and the reason for it; identify and briefly explain the four hallmarks of conjugal love
Principle of totality says: we agree that the primary end of marriage is procreation and marriage must be open to life BUT as long as we intend to AT SOME point be open to life and not use contraception then in other, individual cases, it is okay to use contraception (must in the big picture be open to life but pro contraception in individual acts)
Principle formed because the majority report argued that you can not expect married couples to practice chastity and discipline
Pope Paul VI’s response: a majority vote does not constitute truth - he talks of “conjugal love” and “responsible parenthood” and the need for real definitions - Principle is REJECTED
He said that each and every marriage must remain open to the transmission of life
Intention to eventually be open to life does not justify individual contraception
BEACAUSE responsible parenthood is always at the service of life - no room for selfishness - a child is the greatest gift to spouse or potential sibling ???
4 Hallmarks:
Fully human - rooted in the will and expressed in the body (not act of man)
Total - nothing held back (love for who they are + for their own sake)
Faithful - exclusive until death
Fruitful - ordered towards procreation and education of kids (crowning glory)
6. Identify the most important teaching found in Humanae vitae; identify seven ways that human procreation is radically different from animal reproduction; identify the relationship between the terms good, end, and meaning, and explain the relationship between the two "meanings" of the conjugal act.
Most important teaching :
The “doctrine of the indissoluable “connection” between procreation and union in the conjugal act”
If the life giving dimension (procreation) of the marital act is removed, then it becomes impossible for the act to signify or bring about spousal union
7 ways that procreation is different from animal reproduction
Humans consciously choose to procreate
The child is a gift, not a byproduct
The child possesses a rational, immortal soul
The child has a super natural vocation to beatitudes; needs supernatural agency
Child is a someone, not a something
Child possesses an incommunicable interiority- cant fully express their inner life
Child is the visible incarnation of the mutual love between parents
Relationship of good meaning and end
A good is that which motivates the will
An end is a good which the will actively seeks
A meaning is the interiorization and experience of the subjects act of willing
A good becomes an end when it is directly willed; the end becomes the meaning when the subject is consciously experiencing his/her act of willing the good
Meaning comes from reflecting and dwelling on the good
Procreation and union as meanings ??
These stand or fall together; if one destroys the meaning of transmitting life, one necessarily destroys its power to signify/ bring about that union
Doctrinal development in conjugal morality - take it a step further by explicitly explaining terms (meaning is a new, elevated term)
7. How does Natural Family Planning differ from contraception if both are used apparently for the same purpose? Also identify and explain four grounds for the immorality of contraception and simply list the four prophecies of Paul VI regarding what would happen if contraceptive use became normative.
NFP involves the correct use of sexual facilities, contraception impedes the finality for our sexual facilities.
The 4 Grounds For Immorality of contraception
Incompatible with conjugal love
Contraception is self-centered - conjugal love is other-centered
Marriage without the form of love is dead
Incompatible with the human person
Contraception degrades a person to use for pleasure - person is not to be objectified
Incompatible with the conjugal act
If act is not both unitive and procreative it is only a sexual act
Not full gift of self
Incompatible with the language of the body.
Body says “i give you all of me” but contraception makes this a lie
Does not give ones fertility
Prophecies
Increased martial infidelity
Husbands seeing wives as sex objects
Lowering of morality especially in young
Government forces birth control programs upon citizens