Chapter 16 – Lean Operations, JIT, TPS & Kanban
Definitions & Key Concepts
• Lean Operations – Deliver exactly what the customer wants, when they want it, with zero waste and a mindset of continuous improvement (Kaizen).
• JIT (Just-In-Time) – Inventory arrives “just in the nick of time.” Primarily an inventory strategy but inseparable from Lean because it:
– Forces problem-solving by exposing issues quickly.
– Reduces carrying costs and space.
• TPS (Toyota Production System) – Historical origin of modern Lean.
– Spawned today’s Ford, Mercedes, Honda, etc. production systems.
– Interlocks Lean + JIT under a culture of respect for people and relentless improvement.
• Triad Relationship
– Lean = strategic philosophy.
– JIT = inventory mechanism.
– TPS = cultural/operational framework that institutionalises the first two.
Competitive Aims of Lean
• Eliminate Waste (Muda)
• Remove Variability (Mura)
• Increase Throughput (Flow)
• Applicable to manufacturing and service sectors (hence “Lean Operations,” not merely “Lean Production”).
The Seven Wastes (Taiichi Ōno)
- Overproduction – Making more/earlier than needed.
- Waiting/Queues – Idle time (e.g., Disney queues → Fast-Pass solution).
- Transportation – Unnecessary moves; Mercedes located suppliers within of Tuscaloosa plant to cut this waste.
- Inventory – Ties cash, hides defects; “Inventory is evil” in Lean parlance.
- Motion – Excess walking/reaching.
- Over-processing – Doing more work or tighter tolerances than customer values.
- Defects – Rework, scrap, warranty.
• Add-on wastes often cited: energy, water, space, talent, etc.
5S (House-Keeping for Waste Removal)
- Sort – Remove unused items.
- Straighten / Simplify – Arrange for easy retrieval (peg-board silhouettes, labelled drawers).
- Shine / Sweep – Clean = problems become visible.
- Standardise – Same method every time; eliminates variability.
- Sustain – Make it habitual; audits, visuals.
• Additional S’s frequently appended: Safety & Support → “7S.”
Variability Reduction
• Any deviation from the optimum (positive or negative) is wasteful.
• Inventory hides variability (the “river & rocks” analogy).
– Lower inventory → expose problems → fix them → lower inventory further.
• Primary sources: poor quality, bad maintenance, erratic demand/forecasting.
Throughput & Pull Systems
• Throughput – Time a unit spends from start to finish.
• Pull vs Push
– Pull: Production triggered only by actual demand (Kanban signal).
– Fast-food example: order at speaker triggers sandwich assembly.
– Improves flow, quality, freshness; minimises WIP.
• Small lots shorten lead-time, expose defects sooner.
JIT & Supplier Partnerships
• Lean/JIT extends upstream; suppliers must be involved.
– Joint process design, shared data, frequent deliveries, quality assistance.
• Supplier concerns:
– Heavy dependence on one customer & frozen schedules.
– Short lead-time & small lots raise set-up frequency.
– Need guaranteed volume/pricing to offset risk.
Facility Layout & Workforce
• Cellular flow, short paths, minimal space.
• Poka-yoke (error-proofing) embedded.
• Cross-training & flexible stations enable quick change-over.
Inventory, EOQ & Set-up Cost Trade-off
• EOQ formula (Chapter 12 reminder): where
– = annual demand, = set-up/ordering cost, = holding cost/unit/year.
• Lowering lot size halves average inventory but doubles set-ups – unless is reduced.
• Set-up-time ↔ Set-up-cost bridge:
– .
– Example: Budget per set-up.
• $30/h tech ⇒ allowed.
• $60/h engineer ⇒ .
• Simplify so a $15/h intern can do it ⇒ , or do it in and shrink further.
• Reducing drops total cost curve, permitting smaller EOQ and hence Lean-desired low inventory.
Kanban Systems
• Kanban = “signal” or “card.” Could be:
– Empty pallet/box, flagged rack space, electronic order, verbal cue.
• Mechanics: downstream process sends Kanban upstream; upstream produces only what Kanban specifies.
• Number of Kanbans (containers)
– = demand during lead-time (same units as container).
– = safety stock (can be % of demand, fixed qty, or days of supply).
– = container capacity (use EOQ if container size is flexible).
• Cupcake Example:
– Demand: .
– Lead-time: ⇒ .
– Safety stock: .
– Container (tray): .
– trays required to keep flow uninterrupted.
• Creating extra Kanbans speeds flow (e.g., Chick-fil-A employee with iPad at car 10-14 adds earlier “signals” in the queue).
Toyota Production System (TPS) Culture & Tools
• Respect for People – Empowered workers stop process for quality (Jidoka).
• Kaizen – Frequent small improvements; employees hunt waste.
• Standardised Work – Removes variability, eases training.
• Jidoka – “Automation with a human touch;” Andon board visually flags stoppage/root cause.
• Heijunka – Level loading to smooth schedule (helps suppliers).
• Gemba Walk – Managers “go to the real place” to observe facts firsthand.
• Balances elimination of Muda (waste) with avoidance of Muri (over-burden) & Mura (unevenness).
Lean in Service Industries
• Fast-food, banking, healthcare, theme parks all apply Lean:
– Chick-fil-A pull system & on-lot order takers.
– Disney Fast-Pass reduces queue waste.
• Metric focus shifts from part counts to patient wait time, loan approval cycle, etc., but principles identical.
Ethical, Philosophical & Practical Implications
• Reducing waste conserves resources (environmental benefit).
• Respect-for-people principle fosters safer, more engaging workplaces.
• Continuous improvement culture prevents complacency, sustaining competitiveness.
Key Formulas & Numerical Reminders
• EOQ: .
• Average inventory under EOQ: .
• Kanban count: .
• Set-up budget time: .
Logical Flow of Implementation
- Adopt Lean mindset – zero waste, customer focus.
- Map processes – identify 7 wastes.
- Apply 5S to gain quick wins & visibility.
- Lower inventory gradually to reveal variability.
- Streamline set-ups to offset increased frequency.
- Introduce Kanban to regulate pull.
- Engage suppliers; extend JIT upstream.
- Institutionalise TPS tools – Kaizen, Jidoka, standard work, Gemba.
- Measure & repeat – continuous improvement never ends.
“Inventory is evil, but variability is its accomplice; shrink one to expose and eliminate the other.”
End of Chapter 16 Lean Operations study notes.