The Complexity of Identity, who am I?
Complexity of Identity
- Identity is shaped by individual traits, family, history, and social/political contexts.
- Influenced by perceptions from family, peers, teachers, and media.
- Erik Erikson's theory highlights social, cultural, and historical contexts in identity development.
- Identity integration is a lifelong journey starting in adolescence.
Dominant vs Subordinate Identities
- Dominant groups define societal norms and hold power (e.g., employment, history validation).
- Subordinate groups often labeled as inferior and face systemic oppression (e.g., racism, sexism).
- Those in dominant positions may not recognize their privileged identity.
Oppression and Internalization
- Subordinates often internalize negative reflections from dominant culture, leading to self-doubt or self-hate.
- Dominants are typically unaware of subordinates' experiences and struggles.
Intersectionality of Identities
- Individuals may possess both dominant and subordinate identities, depending on context (e.g., race, gender, sexuality).
- Each category of identity carries its unique oppression.
Identity Categories and Socialization
- Identity is influenced by community, institutions, and societal expectations (e.g., schools, media).
- Individuals navigate these dynamics, forming their identities within expected norms.
Levels of Identity Development
- Micro Level: Personal identity includes individual choices and preferences.
- Meso Level: Community interactions challenge and affirm identities.
- Macro Level: Structural inequalities based on classifying people (race, gender, etc.) influence identity recognition.
Conclusion
- Identity formation is ongoing and influenced by societal structures, requiring individuals to navigate complex interrelations among different aspects of their identity.