Psychology Lecture Notes - Flashcards
Scientific Method and Foundations of Psychology
PSYC 09/01: For study guides, combine readings + notes from lecture.
Psychology: the scientific study of behavior and mental processes.
Key terms:
Behavior: observable actions (talking, facial expressions, movement).
Mental processes: internal activities (thinking, feeling, remembering).
Hub science: psychology influences many fields (cancer research, health, migration, climate change).
Why science in psychology?
Systematic approach reduces bias and yields reliable observations.
Distinguishes between expectations and actual behavior.
Scientific Method steps (from intro):
1) Questions based on observations.
2) Develop a testable guess – the hypothesis – specify variables that can vary or be measured.
3) Test hypothesis.
4) Draw conclusions (learning from being wrong; retest to check for luck).
5) Report.
Historical Roots and Core Theme
Psychology is relatively young; ~146 years old.
Before formal discipline: philosophers, medical doctors, physiologists explored mind–body connections.
Philosophers: Plato, Aristotle, Descartes.
Early scientists in perception: Gustav Fechner (perception experiments), Hermann von Helmholtz (visual and auditory perception).
Core integrative theme: general principles of behavior with recognition of individual differences in motivation and experience.
Founders and Pioneers
Wilhelm Wundt — Founder of Psychology
First psychology lab in Leipzig, Germany (1879).
Introduced objective introspection: measuring one’s own thoughts and mental activities.
Consciousness could be broken into basic elements: thoughts, emotions, experiences.
Emphasized objectivity and measurement; founded psychology as a science.
Edward Titchener — Structuralism (Wundt’s student at Cornell)
Structure of the mind; experiences broken into emotions and sensations.
Used introspection for both physical sensations and abstract thoughts.
Margaret F. Washburn — first woman with psychology Ph.D. (student of Titchener).
William James — Functionalism
Harvard professor; Principles of Psychology (influential).
Focused on how the mind helps people function in daily life; influenced by Darwin.
Led to fields like educational psychology, I-O psychology, evolutionary psychology.
Underrepresented pioneers:
Mary Whiton Calkins: completed Ph.D. requirements but denied degree; first woman APA president.
20th-century minority contributions:
Francis Cecil Sumner: first Black American Ph.D. in psychology; founder of Black American psychology.
Kenneth & Mamie Clark: studied segregation effects; Kenneth Clark was a first Black APA president.
George Sanchez: Hispanic psychologist studying cultural bias in intelligence testing.
Other notable figures: Inez Beverly Prosser, Ruth Howard, Charles Henry Thompson, Albert Sidney Beckham, Robert Prentiss Daniel, Howard Hale Long.
Gestalt and Psychoanalytic Traditions
Gestalt Psychology — Max Wertheimer
Core idea: experiences (perception) must be understood as whole patterns, not decomposed.
Slogan: “The whole is greater than the sum of its parts.”
Legacy: influenced cognitive psychology, social psychology, Gestalt therapy; humans naturally seek patterns in sensory input.
Psychoanalysis — Sigmund Freud
Core ideas: behavior driven by unconscious motives and repressed desires; early childhood shapes personality.
Therapy aims to uncover unconscious motives to treat disorders.
Legacy: influenced modern psychotherapy; key followers: Carl Jung, Alfred Adler, Karen Horney, Anna Freud, Erik Erikson.
Behaviorism and Early Social-Psychological Contributions
Behaviorism — key figures: Ivan Pavlov, John B. Watson, Rosalie Rayner, Mary Cover Jones
Core ideas: psychology should focus on observable behavior; behavior learned via conditioning.
Classical conditioning (Pavlov’s dogs); conditioned fear (Watson & Rayner’s Little Albert); counterconditioning (Mary Cover Jones’s Little Peter).
Legacy: remains influential; paved the way for behavior therapy and cognitive psychology.
Diversity in Psychology
Early underrepresented contributors overcame barriers; Dr. Alexandra Rutherford highlighted contributions via Psychology’s Feminist Voices.
Modern Perspectives in Psychology (Major and Additional)
1) Psychodynamic Perspective
Evolved from Freud’s psychoanalysis.
Focus: unconscious mind, early experiences, interpersonal relationships.
Modern view adds self-development and social motivations; sometimes links neurobiology with psychodynamic concepts.
2) Behavioral Perspective
Origins: Watson and Skinner.
Emphasizes observable behavior and conditioning; operant conditioning: behaviors followed by rewards are reinforced.
3) Humanistic Perspective
The “third force.”
Emphasizes free will, self-actualization, personal growth.
Key figures: Abraham Maslow, Carl Rogers; influences positive psychology.
4) Cognitive Perspective
Studies thinking, memory, problem-solving, language.
Influenced by Piaget; computer models of cognition; includes cognitive neuroscience with brain imaging (MRI, fMRI, PET).
5) Sociocultural Perspective
Combines social psychology and cultural psychology.
Focuses on culture and social context shaping behavior; cross-cultural research; bystander effect; influenced by Lev Vygotsky.
6) Biopsychological Perspective
Biological bases of behavior: brain chemicals, hormones, genetics; overlaps with neuroscience.
Topics: sleep, emotions, sexual orientation, schizophrenia, Alzheimer’s disease.
7) Evolutionary Perspective
Universal mental traits shaped by natural selection.
Explains fear, mate selection, altruism, emotional development; traits evolved to solve problems faced by early humans.
Additional perspectives
Feminist Psychology: women’s experiences and gender biases in healthcare and emotion.
Multicultural Psychology: identity factors shaping worldview and behavior.
Eclectic approach: many psychologists blend elements from multiple perspectives.
Modern Synthesis and Practice
Multiple perspectives used to understand behavior; no single perspective explains everything.
Psychologists’ professional roles and specializations
Psychologist: Ph.D., Psy.D., or Ed.D.; settings include academia, business, healthcare; may specialize in research, therapy, education, or design; typically cannot prescribe medication (except in some states or military roles).
Psychiatrist: M.D.; diagnoses and treats psychological disorders; can prescribe medication.
Psychiatric Social Worker: MSW; focuses on community factors affecting mental health (poverty, stress).
Other Professionals: licensed counselors, marriage and family therapists, substance abuse counselors; training ranges from associate to doctoral degrees.
Research in Psychology
Basic Research: aims to expand scientific knowledge (e.g., attention and distraction).
Applied Research: solves real-world problems (e.g., texting while driving).
Critical Thinking and Media Literacy in Psychology
What is Critical Thinking?
Making reasoned, logical judgments; asking questions; seeking evidence; evaluating claims.
Helps avoid false beliefs, poor decisions, harmful outcomes.
Why is it important?
The world contains misleading claims (miracle cures, astrology, homeopathy).
Critical thinking aids evaluation of media, advertising, and scientific claims.
Four Basic Criteria for Critical Thinking 1) Few truths are beyond testing
Most claims should be supported by empirical evidence; beliefs questioned unless based on faith or personal values.
2) All evidence is not equalEvaluate evidence gathering; beware poorly designed studies, bias, conflicts of interest.
3) Authority ≠ TruthDon’t take claims from experts as truth; seek supporting evidence; consider alternatives; use the parsimony principle: simplest explanation is often best.
4) Open-mindednessBe skeptical but not closed-minded; stay open to new evidence, even if it challenges beliefs.
Examples often cited
Astrology and homeopathy lack scientific support.
Crop circles explained by hoaxes, not aliens.
Life on Mars: no evidence yet; scientists remain open to possibilities.
Goals of Psychology
Describe behavior: observe and detail.
Explain behavior: understand why it happens.
Predict behavior: anticipate when it will recur.
Control behavior: modify behavior to achieve desired outcomes.
The Scientific Method in Psychology (Steps and Replication)
The five-step method to reduce bias and error:
Perceive the Question: identify an interesting or puzzling behavior.
Form a Hypothesis: make a testable, if–then statement, e.g., ext{If } X ext{, then } Y.
Test the Hypothesis: use experiments, surveys, or observations to collect data.
Draw Conclusions: analyze whether the hypothesis is supported.
Report Results: share findings to enable replication.
Example study: Sapna Cheryan on gender and computer science
Environmental cues (stereotypical vs. non-stereotypical environments) affect women’s interest and perceived fit in CS.
Demonstrates environmental cues’ influence on career choices.
Replication importance
Replication strengthens reliability; psychology faces a replicability crisis; researchers are improving methods and transparency.
Research Designs and Data Concepts
Empirical vs. Non-Empirical questions
Empirical: testable with evidence (e.g., Has life existed on Mars?).
Non-empirical: based on belief; not scientifically testable (e.g., meaning of life).
Naturalistic Observation
Observing behavior in natural environments (wild animals, public spaces).
Advantages: realistic picture of behavior.
Disadvantages: observer effect, observer bias, limited generalizability to other settings.
Solutions: masked observers; multiple observers for reliability.
Laboratory Observation
Controlled environment.
Advantages: greater variable control.
Disadvantages: behavior may be artificial.
Case Studies
In-depth study of one person or small group.
Advantages: detailed information; useful for rare conditions (e.g., Phineas Gage).
Disadvantages: cannot generalize; subject to researcher bias.
Surveys
Questions about attitudes, opinions, or behaviors; via interviews, questionnaires, or online.
Advantages: large samples; private behaviors.
Disadvantages: sampling bias; courtesy bias; question wording/order effects.
Correlation in research
Correlation measures the relationship between two or more variables and helps predict one from another.
Correlation coefficient: r indicates direction and strength of the relationship.
Range: -1 \, to \, +1
Interpretation:
Positive correlation: both variables move in the same direction.
Negative correlation: one increases as the other decreases.
Closer to ±1.00: stronger; closer to 0: weaker or no relationship.
Important reminder: Correlation does not imply causation; third variables may influence both.
Visual aids: Scatterplots illustrate direction and strength of relationships (perfect positive/negative, modest, none).
Experimental Method and Design
Experiments establish causal relationships by manipulating an independent variable (IV) and observing a dependent variable (DV) while controlling extraneous variables.
Steps in designing an experiment: 1) Selection of Participants
Random selection from a defined population to avoid bias.
Example: select 3–4-year-old children from day care centers or pediatrician referrals.
2) Defining VariablesIV: manipulated variable (e.g., exposure to violent cartoons).
DV: measured behavior (e.g., aggressive actions).
Operational definitions: specify how variables are measured (e.g., a checklist of aggressive behaviors like hitting or pushing).
3) Controlling Confounding VariablesUse control groups to isolate IV effects.
Example: compare violent-cartoon viewers (experimental group) vs nonviolent-cartoon viewers (control group).
4) Random AssignmentParticipants randomly assigned to experimental or control groups to evenly distribute extraneous variables.
Experimental groups vs control groups
Experimental Group: receives manipulated IV (e.g., violent cartoon).
Control Group: does not receive the treatment or receives a neutral condition (e.g., nonviolent cartoon).
Complex designs
Multiple experimental groups (different drug doses).
Multiple IVs (age, gender, video game exposure).
Multiple DVs (memory scores, anxiety levels).
Common problems in experiments
Placebo Effect: improvement due to expectation, not the treatment.
Example: sugar pill reduces pain due to belief.
Experimenter Effect: researcher’s expectations subtly influence participants.
Example: tone of voice or body language cues guide responses.
Controlling for these effects
Single-masked study: participants don’t know if receiving real treatment or placebo.
Double-masked (double-blind) study: neither participants nor experimenters know group assignments; data coded and revealed after analysis.
Ethics in Psychological Research
WEIRD Problem (Population bias)
Many studies use Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic populations; results may not generalize to non-WEIRD groups.
Researchers should state population studied and avoid overgeneralization.
Core Ethical Principles in Psychological Research 1) Participant Welfare Comes First
Rights and well-being must outweigh research value; no physical or psychological harm.
2) Informed ConsentClear, understandable information before participation; parental consent for children; even in masked studies, participants should know they may be in experimental or control group.
3) Justified Use of DeceptionDeception allowed only when necessary and explained afterward in debriefing.
True nature and purposes disclosed after study.
4) Right to WithdrawParticipants may leave at any time without penalty.
5) Risk Disclosure and ProtectionProtect participants from risks; procedures must be safe; inform of potential risks.
6) DebriefingExplain study’s purpose and expected outcomes after participation; especially if deception used.
7) ConfidentialityData kept confidential; results reported in aggregate.
8) Responsibility for Participant Well-beingDetect and correct unexpected negative effects; obligation to help vulnerable populations; not just data collection.
Special Considerations for Marginalized Groups
Avoid exploiting communities (Native American, LGBTQ+, impoverished groups).
Ethical research includes sharing results meaningfully and giving back to communities studied.
Ethical Guidelines for Research with Humans
Psychologists prioritize participant health and welfare; core principles include rights, informed consent, deception justification, withdrawal rights, risk protection, debriefing, confidentiality, and responsible oversight.
Guidelines for Research with Nonhuman Animals
Why use nonhuman animals?
Some questions are dangerous or impractical with humans; easier control; shorter lifespans aid long-term studies; simpler behavior aids observation.
Oversight and welfare
Institutions use Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) to ensure humane treatment.
Minimizing harm
Avoid unnecessary pain; use anesthesia for surgery; humane euthanasia if required.
Scope of use
Nonhuman animals are used in about 7% of psychological studies.
Summary: Core Takeaways
Psychology blends descriptive and experimental approaches to understand behavior and mental processes.
Multiple perspectives provide a comprehensive view; nonetheless, replication and methodological rigor are crucial.
Ethical guidelines govern studies with humans and animals to protect welfare and ensure scientific integrity.
Critical thinking is essential to evaluate claims, especially in media and everyday life; distinguish empirical evidence from beliefs; understand correlation vs causation; and recognize the importance of replication.
The scientific method in psychology integrates observation, hypothesis testing, rigorous design, and transparent reporting to advance knowledge.