Memory Processing Notes: Temporal Lobes and Beyond

Memory Processing: Temporal Lobes and Beyond

Introduction

  • We're shifting from sensory processing and vision to memory as a distinct process.
  • Today's focus: fundamental aspects of memory.
  • Thursday: Jo Robson will discuss clinical work in dementia.
  • We'll explore the temporal lobes' role in memory, building on our previous discussion of object recognition.

Clinical Case: Henry Molaison (H.M.)

  • H.M. (Henry Molaison), the most studied patient in neuroscience, died in February 2008 at age 82.
  • Crucial because we have pre-event functional data.
  • Surgery aimed to reduce seizures from temporal lobe epilepsy due to limited treatment options at the time like surgical intervention.
  • Seizure origin points in the temporal lobe were surgically removed, successfully reducing seizures but causing profound forgetfulness.
  • This forgetfulness affected verbal and nonverbal material across all sensory modalities.
  • H.M. had no intellectual or perceptual deficits; his ability to process information was intact.
  • His case highlighted a specific memory deficit due to the surgery.
  • H.M. was psychiatrically normal before the surgery, so changes were attributed to a specific memory deficit related to the specific lesion from the surgery.
  • Prior to H.M., memory was thought to be distributed throughout the cortex.
  • H.M.'s case led to the realization that memory is a distinct cerebral function.
  • Multiple types of memory processes exist, separate from perception and cognition.
  • The medial temporal lobe is particularly implicated in memory function.

Details of H.M.'s Surgery

  • Bilateral resection of mesial temporal tissue.
  • Areas targeted for surgical removal are dark areas.
  • Structures removed: amygdala, most of the hippocampi, and part of the parahippocampal gyrus.
  • Extensive tissue removal likely severed connections from neurons not directly removed, affecting connectivity.

Post-Mortem Analysis and Additional Findings

  • MRI technology allowed structural analysis post-surgery.
  • Postmortem autopsy in 2014 revealed additional signs of collateral damage: an orbitofrontal lesion potentially caused during surgery, possibly impacting working memory.
  • Cerebellar atrophy was evident from long-term medication use.
  • Functional changes in H.M. may not be solely due to the temporal lobe lesion.

Impact of Surgery on H.M.

  • Two years post-surgery, no impact on personality, attention span, or verbal memory.
  • Profound and selective impact on past memory; poor recollection of years prior to surgery.
  • H.M. believed the date was March 1953 (six months before the operation).
  • Past memory recovered over time, but the capacity to form new memories did not.
  • H.M. couldn't remember events after the surgery, highlighting potential differences in brain regions for past vs. new memories.
  • Retrograde amnesia: impairment for memories created prior to the injury.
  • Anterograde amnesia: impairment for memories that you might want to create after an injury - impairment in learning novel information.
  • Sensory information worked normally, but the ability to retain information was lost.

Types of Anterograde Amnesia

  • Declarative memory (facts and events) vs. procedural memory (skills and tasks).
  • Declarative memory: conscious access to learned information; abstract information.
  • Procedural memory: remembering how to do things; skill-based learning.
  • H.M.'s declarative memory was severely impaired post-op.
  • He couldn't navigate to find his family home or recall names/faces of new acquaintances.
  • Language was largely frozen in the 1950s.
  • He could retain new information with active rehearsal but lost it upon distraction (working memory intact).
  • Procedural memory was relatively unaffected; he could learn new skills with no memory of learning them. (like mirror drawing)

Mirror Drawing Task

  • Task where person draws a star by looking in the mirror.
  • Visual information says to move the pencil the right, but mirror reverses that.
  • Requires learning a new mapping between visual input and motor sequencing.
  • H.M. showed clear evidence of learning over days, despite lacking conscious memory of the task.

What H.M. Tells Us About Memory

  • Temporal lobe (mesial temporal lobe) essential for memory function, more for anterograde than retrograde memory.
  • Past memories rely on brain areas outside those removed during surgery.
  • Difference between declarative and procedural memory, as H.M. could learn new tasks but not remember new information.
  • Relationship between structure and memory function not completely clear.
  • Extent of surgery only truly understood post-mortem.
  • H.M. is one case study.
  • Intact memory function relies on an extended network.
  • Functional asymmetry in memory function (left and right sides play different roles).

Anatomy of the Temporal Lobes

  • Lateral view of the right hemisphere shows superior, middle, and inferior temporal gyrus.
  • Gyri: superior, middle, and inferior temporal gyrus.
  • Sulci: superior temporal sulcus and the inferior temporal sulcus.
  • Medial surface shows the hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus.

Medial Temporal Lobe Subregions

  • Entorhinal cortex, perirhinal cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, and parahippocampal complex play distinct roles in memory function.
  • Connectivity: Unimodal and polymodal association areas (frontal, temporal, and parietal areas) connect to the periorhinal cortex and the parahippocortex.
  • Those make connections via the inter rhinal cortex to he hippocampal formation.
  • Sensory information is sent to the hippocampal formation for long term storage; reciprocal connections between the hippocampal formation and temporal neocortex.

Hippocampal Formation

  • Hippocampal formation essential for learning and consolidating novel information. The sub areas are CA1 to CA3.
  • Necessary for relational memory, as demonstrated by paired associate learning tasks (arbitrary associations).
  • Hippocampal formation is important for making those associations.
  • Retrieving memories may involve processes outside the hippocampal formation.
  • Direct connections exist between sensory areas and temporal areas.

Memory Structures Beyond the Temporal Lobes

  • Papez circuit (amygdala, hippocampus, fornix, mammillary body, and cingulate gyrus) proposed by James Papez as a circuit for emotional experience and expression.
  • The limbic system incorporates the amygdala.
  • The anterior thalamic nuclei is involved in declarative memory.
  • Alzheimer's disease associated with reduced neural activity in the Papez circuit.
Amygdala
  • Key role in fear conditioning and emotional processing.
  • Supports memory for emotionally arousing experiences.
  • Lesions result in loss of conditioned fear, impaired fear learning, and reduced memory for emotionally charged events.
Frontal Lobes
  • Important for memory encoding and retrieval strategies.
  • Lesions cause impairments in contextual details (source, chronological order).
  • Damage can result in confabulation (distortions of memories).
  • Connections exist between frontal lobes and the hippocampus/parahippocampal areas.
Diencephalon (Thalamus and Hypothalamus)
  • Thalamus plays a role in sensory information and has connectivity with memory-related areas.
  • Anterior and medial thalamus contribute to amnesia.
  • Damage to the mammalothalamic tract results in deficits of episodic long term memory, particularly, your ability to remember particular events.
  • Dorsal medial nucleus damage: deficits in selecting appropriate information for retrieval.
  • Intralaminal midline nuclei damage: deficits in memory retrieval and semantic memory.

Memory at the Level of the Individual Neuron

  • Memory formation relies on changes at the level of individual neurons.
  • A typical neuron has a cell body, dendrites (input), and axon (output).
  • Neurons exist in a network with signals traveling to and from.

Synaptic Transmission

  • At the synapse (between neurons), an electrical signal is converted into a chemical signal (neurotransmitter release).
  • Neurotransmitters bind with receptors on the postsynaptic neuron, opening ion channels and causing electrical signal fluctuations.
  • The amount of neurotransmitter released and the number of channels opened determine the response in the next neuron.
  • One of the key things in memory formation is changing in the way that individual synapses work.

Synaptic Plasticity and Hebb's Rule

  • All learning involves changes in synaptic function.
  • Synaptic plasticity:Changes in the synapse, largely determined by the biochemistry of synaptic change.
  • Hebbs Rule is an important principle in learning:
    AA and BB, Heb's rule states that if neuron A repeatedly excites neuron B, there will be changes such that BB is more easily excited by AA.
  • Long-term potentiation (LTP): repeated excitation causes synaptic changes.
  • Glutamine: the excitatory neurotransmitter in neurons.
  • LTP changes the efficacy of the synapse but not by growing new connections.
  • Repeated stimulation leads to changes in the synapse for that existing neural connection.

Long-Term Potentiation Details

  • More vesicles = more neurotransmitter. Releasing more neurotransmitters and creating more open channels with stimulation leads and a bigger electrical change.
  • The larger the electrical change in the postsynaptic neuron, the more inclined that electrical signal is to propagate on and be passed to the next neuron.
  • This reflects fundamentally altered synapse electrical response between the neurons.

Locations of Synaptic Plasticity in the Brain

  • Structures within the temporal lobe hippocampus (CA1, dentate gyrus), entorhinal cortex, and amygdala.
  • Structures beyond the temporal lobe: prefrontal cortex, motor cortex, thalamus, and visual cortex.
  • The key idea is: experience changes the way the network operates

Other Types of Synaptic Plasticity

  • Long-term depression: decrease of synapse connectivity strength in synapse from low frequency stimulation.
  • Habituation: repeated stimulation results in a weaker signal across time.
  • Sensitization: a single stimulus causes an exaggerated synaptic response to subsequent repeated stimuli.

Conclusion

  • H.M. provided considerable insights into memory function.