MANUSCRIPT-PRACTICAL RESEARCH

Page 1: Title

  • Title: Parenting Styles and Social Behavior of Grade 12 Students in Santo Tomas National High School

  • Presented by: Celestina Moyet, Chalea Mica Tan, Jaze Nicole Papacoy, Lency Jeanne Legaspi, Jasmin Del Pilar, Yumi Artaajo, Jamaica Mabaso, Bernadeth Villaflor, Mike Labton

  • Date: November 2024

Page 2: Acknowledgement

  • Gratitude: Expressed to all contributors for support and guidance during the study.

    • Adviser: Dr. Evangeline Lurica for expertise and support.

    • Panelists: Dr. Vicente Pines, Dr. Mark Angelo Tabajonda, Ma’am Rey Anne Bungabong for insights.

    • Principal & Head Teacher: Ricardo M. Olmedo Jr. and Sir Bernard Eugenio for support.

    • Participants: Appreciation for the students sharing their experiences.

    • Families & Friends: Thanks for emotional support and discussions during research.

Page 3: Acknowledgment Continuation

  • Spiritual Gratitude: Thanks to Almighty God for guidance and strength.

  • Omissions: Apologies for any inadvertent omissions in acknowledgments.

Page 4: Dedication

  • Dedication: To parents for their love and support, teachers and friends for their advice, and to God for knowledge and perseverance.

Page 5: Table of Contents

  • Sections:

    • Title Page

    • Approval Sheet

    • Acknowledgement

    • Dedication

    • Table of Contents

    • List of Appendices

    • List of Tables

    • Abstract

    • Chapter 1: Introduction

    • Chapter 2: Methodology

    • Chapter 3: Results

    • Chapter 4: Discussions

    • References

    • Appendices

Page 6: Methodology Overview

  • Research Design: Outline of methodology sections covering research design, locale, respondents, and data analysis (pages referenced).

Page 7: Abstract

  • Study Aim: Assess levels of parenting styles and their relationship with social behavior of Grade 12 students.

  • Method: Descriptive-correlational design, sampling 288 students with standardized questionnaires.

  • Findings: Authoritative parenting style shows highest mean; permissive parenting lowest. Low positive correlation exists between parenting styles and social behavior.

    • Statistical Values: r-value 0.46, p-value 0.00.

Page 8: Introduction Rationale

  • Context: Importance of adolescence for social and emotional development.

  • Influence of Parenting Styles:

    • Authoritarian linked to negative behaviors, permissive may cause impulsivity, authoritative correlates with positive social outcomes.

  • Cultural Aspects: Cultural influences on social behavior and parenting styles.

Page 9: Study Context

  • Previous Studies: Discuss issues with authoritarian parenting; emphasize benefits of authoritative parenting on social behaviors.

  • Goal: Address gaps in understanding parenting influences on Grade 12 students.

Page 10: Research Objectives & Hypotheses

  • Objectives:

    1. Level assessment of different parenting styles: authoritative, authoritarian, permissive.

    2. Level assessment of social behavior.

    3. Test significant relationships.

  • Hypotheses:

    • Null hypotheses for each parenting style regarding their relationship with social behavior.

Page 11: Theoretical Framework

  • Baumrind's Parenting Styles: Overview of authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive styles impacting student behavior.

  • Bandura's Social Learning Theory: Emphasis on observational learning in social contexts.

  • Attachment Theory: Examines emotional bonds and their effects on social behavior.

Page 12: Theoretical Framework Continued

  • Attachment Types: Secure vs. insecure attachments influence on social interactions and emotional regulation.

Page 13: Conceptual Framework

  • Conceptual Diagram: Visualization of parenting styles as independent variable impacting social behavior as dependent variable.

Page 14: Study Significance

  • Relevance: Benefits for students, parents, teachers, and researchers in enhancing understanding of parenting impacts.

Page 15: Scope and Delimitations

  • Target Group: Senior high school students from Sto. Tomas National High School, excluding non-teaching staff and others.

Page 16: Review of Related Literature

  • Prior Research: Summarizes related literature on parenting styles effects on behavior and self-esteem across genders.

Page 17: Review of Related Literature Continued

  • Cultural Considerations: Importance of understanding regional parenting variations impacting development outcomes.

Page 18: Authoritarian Parenting

  • Effects: Negative correlations with social skills and increased aggression observed in children raised under authoritarian conditions.

Page 19: Permissive Parenting

  • Behavioral Implications: Links between permissive parenting and disrupted behavior, highlighting warm but lenient parenting consequences.

Page 20: Authoritative Parenting

  • Positive Outcomes: Overview of research findings associated with balanced authoritative parenting leading to better social skills and emotional regulation.

Page 21: Social Behavior

  • Overview of Influence: Discussion on democratic parenting’s positive effects on children’s emotional intelligence and social competence.

Page 22: Correlation Analysis

  • Research Findings: Connections between parenting styles and social competence/antisocial behavior, noting significant correlations with problematic behaviors.

Page 23: Authoritarian vs. Permissive Influences

  • Findings: Impact of parenting styles on antisocial behavior and child social development.

Page 24: Socio-emotional Skills

  • Adolescent Development: Impact of parenting styles on children's socio-emotional skills, underscoring authoritative approaches as beneficial.

Page 25: Definition of Terms

  • Parenting Styles: Definitions and descriptions related to independent and dependent variables of the study.

Page 26: Methodology Overview

  • Research Design: Explanation of descriptive-correlational design for study.

Page 27: Respondents

  • Sample Size: 288 Grade 12 students from Sto. Tomas National High School determined via Slovin’s formula.

Page 28: Research Locale

  • Location: Sto. Tomas National High School in Davao del Norte, noted for its diverse student body.

Page 29: Research Instrument

  • Data Collection Tool: Adopted questionnaire assessing parenting styles and social behavior using a Likert scale.

Page 30: Measurement Levels

  • Parenting Style and Social Behavior Description: Detailed descriptions and interpretations of rating scores on parenting and social behavior.

Page 31: Data Gathering Procedure

  • Process Outline: Steps for permission, questionnaire validation, ethical considerations, and actual data collection methods.

Page 32: Data Analysis Methods

  • Statistical Tools: Explanation of statistical measures used to analyze correlations in parenting styles and student behaviors.

Page 33: Ethical Considerations

  • Conduct Ethics: Importance of informed consent, respect for participants, and maintaining integrity in research practices.

Page 34: Chapter 3 Results Overview

  • Findings Summary: Overview of parenting styles’ evaluation and social behavior levels among students with statistical insights.

Page 35: Level of Parenting Styles

  • Analysis Reported: Mean scores of indicators in different parenting styles indicating overall observations in students.

Page 36: Authoritative Parenting Table

  • Detailed Breakdown: Presentation of authoritative parenting indicators and respective statistical evaluations.

Page 37: Authoritarian Parenting Table

  • Analysis of Indicator Scores: Presentation and analysis of authoritarian parenting indicators.

Page 38: Permissive Parenting Table

  • Findings Summary: Overview of permissive parenting practices and evaluations.

Page 39: Social Behavior Statistics

  • Social Behavior Assessment: Mean calculations and definitions indicating levels of social behavior among students.

Page 40: Relationship Analysis

  • Correlation Results: Data showing correlation between parenting styles and social behavior, null hypothesis results.

Page 41: Chapter 4 Discussion Overview

  • Discussion Points: In-depth discussions on parenting styles’ levels and relationship with children's social behavior, drawing from prior research.

Page 42: Insights on Parenting Impacts

  • Research Integration: Integration of findings on how various parenting styles impact children's social outcomes and emotional behaviors.

Page 43: Conclusion Highlights

  • Final Remarks: Conclusions drawn on implications of varying parenting styles on social behavior outcomes among students.

Page 44: Recommendations for Improvement

  • Advice to Parents & Schools: Suggestions for adopting balanced approaches and conducting family engagement efforts.

Page 45: References

  • Cited Works: A comprehensive list of all scholarly references used in the study.

Page 46-50: Survey Questionnaire

  • Instrument Structure: Presentation of the survey questionnaire to assess parenting and social behavior.

Page 51-57: CVs of Researchers

  • Individual Profiles: Educational backgrounds and contact information of each researcher.