Lecture 14 10/20/2025
exceptions to the warrant requirment
reasonable suspicion < probably cause
more than a hunch
articulable facts
stop an frisk
only needs reasonable suspicion
cars
Searches incident to arrest
officer’s or others’ safety
preservation of evidence
suspect eats evidence video
Officers can search the arrestee and the innediate area around the arrestee (car: within reach of arrestee)
Arizona v Gant
exception is out when they can’t move
court does not want exeptions to get out of hand
limited exceptions
Exigent Circumstances
Immediate threat to public safety or risk that evidence will be destroyed
probably cause before the exigent circumstance arise
objective reasonableness
hot pursuit
following in pursuit of some one no need of a warrant to tresspass
Emergency assistance
provide emergency medical aid
imminent destruction of evidence
evidence is about to be destroyed or moved
3 ways into a home
consent
warrant
exigent circumstances
by the time the get a warrant the joint and smoke is gone
must not create the exigence
have to have probably cause of the crime before the time of the exigence
Plain view doctrine
open view where they are legally allowed to be
lawful presence
plain view or smell
immediately recognizes the evidence
smell
smell can trigger probable cause
plain view applies to all senses including smell
Automobile searches
cars are special: they can drive away
three doctrine allowing searches without a warrant
reasonable suspicion that vehicle contains contraband
incident to arrest
inventory searches of lawfully impounded vehicles
Checkpoints
sobriety checkpoints
random checkpoints to catch drunk drivers
supreme court “substantial government interest”
impact on drivers’ rights negligible
consent
if people consent the don’t need probable cause or suspicion
don’t have to tell you then need consent and that you can say no
must be voluntary
must have authority to waive the right
what if people disagree
consent can be revoked
footnote 5 of dorm search article
clarifications
sidewalk scenario
consentwarrant
exigency
observation does provide the probable cause necessary to obtain
5th amendment
right not to be witness against oneself
Miranda v arizona
proper safeguards are necessary to remind suspects of their rights and to deter police from third degree
prior to any interrogation in custody, person must be warmed
right to remain silent
any statement can be used against you
right to the presence of an attorney
only applies to testimonial evidence
tree triggers
custody
subject to interrogation
government agent
deception is okay