Kopak et al. (2013)

The Connections Between Substance Dependence, Offense Type, and Offense Severity

Abstract Summary

  • Examines the link between drug use and crime, specifically focusing on the contributions of alcohol and drug dependence to different types of offending.

  • Utilizes data from the 2010 Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring II (ADAM II) program, involving 3,006 male arrestees.

  • Findings:

    • 15% to 39% of arrestees demonstrated drug dependence across offense types.

    • Only 5% to 16% showed signs of alcohol dependence.

    • Drug dependence correlates with higher felony charges; alcohol dependence correlates with violent offenses.

  • Emphasizes the need for systematic assessment and treatment to reduce offenses related to substance use.

Introduction

  • A significant percentage (up to 85%) of offenders have a history of substance use in the U.S.

  • A high proportion of jail inmates report regular drug use prior to committing crimes (69% in the past month).

  • Drug and alcohol use contributes to over 50% of crimes committed.

  • Highlights previous studies and statistics connecting substance use with violent and property crimes.

The Substance Dependence–Crime Connection

  • Goldstein's (1985) three-category classification of substance use and its relation to crime:

    1. Pharmacological Reasons: Direct influence of drugs on behavior.

    2. Economic Motivation: Stealing to finance drug habits.

    3. Systemic Reasons: Violence related to drug trade competition.

  • Defines substance dependence as persistent use despite negative consequences, consistent with the DSM-5 criteria defining serious substance use disorders.

Alcohol Dependence and Offending

  • Alcohol use is strongly associated with violent crime.

  • Regular alcohol consumption increases the chances of committing violent crimes significantly.

  • Research shows alcohol-dependent individuals often engage in aggression, particularly during intoxication.

  • Significant research gaps regarding the link between alcohol dependence and violent offenses exist.

Drug Dependence and Non-Violent Crime

  • Evidence suggests strong connections between drug dependence and non-violent crimes like theft to support drug use.

  • Drug-using offenders often lack legitimate income sources, increasing their involvement in crime.

  • Explores polysubstance use and the impact on criminal behavior and charges.

Methodology

Sample

  • Derived from the ADAM II program, the study involved a probability sample of male arrestees across various states.

  • Inclusion criteria for participants included having complete interviews and clear indicators of offense severity.

  • The final sample contained 3,006 arrestees.

Measures

  • Key predictors: Drug and alcohol dependence were measured with six items each based on the UNCOPE screening tool.

  • Outcome measures:

    • Offense Severity: Misdemeanor vs felony.

    • Offense Type: Includes violent, non-violent, and substance-related offenses.

Descriptive Statistics

  • Majority of arrestees identified as African American (60.3%), with 15.5% being Hispanic/Latino.

  • Most arrestees (83.7%) were single, separated, or divorced.

  • The study sample mainly charged with misdemeanor offenses (60.7%).

Results

Dependence Groups and Offense Types

  • Significant associations found between arrestee charge types and dependence groups:

    • Higher proportion of alcohol-dependent arrestees charged with violent offenses.

    • Drug-dependent arrestees more likely to be charged with less serious, substance-related charges.

Offense Severity

  • Contradictory findings revealed alcohol-dependent individuals were more likely charged with misdemeanors.

  • Drug-dependent arrestees had increased odds of felony charges compared to non-dependent individuals.

Discussion

  • Findings support that substance dependence significantly influences offending types and severity.

  • Present inequities in criminal policy concerning substance dependence among offenders.

  • Recommend systematic screening and treatment efforts for arrestees, particularly those with substance dependence.

Conclusion

  • Criminal justice systems must address substance dependence significantly in policy and practice.

  • Screening for substance dependence following arrest can facilitate effective interventions for offenders.

  • Reevaluating laws governing substance-related offenses is essential to align with the realities of substance dependence.