South Korea just held a presidential election; at the time of recording it was nighttime in Seoul and only exit-poll data were available.
Joint exit poll by all major TV broadcasters gave Lee Jae Myeong of the Democratic Party a comfortable lead of 12 percentage points.
South-Korean exit polls are historically reliable, so media outlets were already projecting Lee as the new president, with an official declaration expected within a few hours.
Democratic Party = broadly left-leaning, mainstream; its base includes many young, progressive, and urban voters.
People Power Party (PPP) = conservative, nationalist, and—at this moment—leaderless after the impeachment of President Yoon Suk-yeol.
Photo described as “telling you everything about South-Korean politics”: Lee behind bulletproof glass on election-night.
Regularly wears protective vest under his suit.
Security detail flanks him with ballistic briefcases:
Made of armor-grade material capable of stopping handgun fire.
Fold out into multi-panel shields during an attack.
Motivation: an assassination attempt in which Lee was stabbed in the neck last year while working a rope-line.
Opponents routinely label him “dictator” and “monster,” indicating extreme polarization.
South Korea is described as having rotated through 5 different presidents in the past 5 months due to impeachments, arrests, and caretaker governments.
Country effectively leaderless for 6 months leading up to this election.
The two men ran against each other in the previous cycle; Yoon barely edged out a win.
Less than 2 years into office, Yoon declared martial law under what courts later called “dubious pretenses” (widely viewed as a power grab).
First sitting South-Korean president ever arrested while in office.
Yoon was impeached, removed, and ultimately jailed; Lee (who had spear-headed the impeachment) now “wins in the end.”
BBC reports: chants for execution of various leaders had become commonplace at rallies.
March police investigation uncovered a credible assassination plot against Lee.
Widespread conspiracy theories, disinformation, and personalized online attacks:
Labels such as “pro-Chinese,” “pro-North-Korean,” or “traitor” flung as standard rhetoric.
Trust in all institutions—from the presidency to courts—has “sharply declined.”
Mirrors a wider OECD trend: Gallup finds young U.S. women are 15 percentage points more liberal than young men; South Korea’s gap is larger and sharper.
International Women’s Day rally in Seoul featured chants: “We vote for feminism.”
Young women have become a key progressive bloc, while young men lean conservative.
Example voice:
Lee Sang-mi (age 31) says gender equality is back-sliding; blames the conservative government.
President Yoon campaigned on abolishing the Ministry of Gender Equality & Family (MOGEF).
Tactical framing: “Divide men and women, collect men’s votes.”
Result: Young men became one of his most ardent constituencies; young women the least supportive.
Prof. (unnamed in transcript, identified as at Ewha Womans Univ.) notes:
Educational parity: Gender gap in schooling has closed thanks to falling birth rates and fierce educational investment.
Labor-market disparity persists: South Korea’s gender wage gap is the largest in the developed world.
Low representation of women on corporate boards and in parliament.
Pollster Chung Han-ul: men feel they are “falling behind” while also losing ~2 years to mandatory military service.
2019 survey: 70\% of men in their 20s say discrimination against men is serious.
Example interviewee Kim Sung-hyun (age 22, engineering student):
Voting conservative because of gender-policy stance.
Opposes quotas for female police or soldiers; argues each sex has “strengths and weaknesses.”
Kim and multiple experts emphasize algorithmic radicalization:
Parties’ positions appear more extreme online than in reality.
Stanford researcher Alice Evans: Echo chambers generate male resentment—“women getting hand-outs, nothing for us.”
Birth rate in South Korea is the lowest in the world (exact figure not provided but below 1.0 births per woman).
Rising gender animosity reduces enthusiasm for dating, marriage, and childbirth.
Prof. Ho Min-ki: If women cannot find partners whose values align (e.g., feminist), they simply opt out of relationships.
Potential risks:
Further demographic collapse.
Undermining democratic legitimacy via persistent polarization.
South-Korean scenario echoes—but intensifies—global trends in gendered politics.
Ethical implications:
Weaponizing anti-feminist rhetoric for votes may entrench sexism and throttle economic growth.
Conversely, ignoring male grievances (conscription, economic precarity) may fuel reactionary backlash.
Real-world relevance: Companies entering Korean market, diplomats, and NGOs must navigate a landscape where gender and politics are deeply intertwined.
5 presidents in 5 months (political churn).
6 months without a formal head of state.
Exit-poll margin: 12 pp lead for Lee.
Young U.S. women vs. men: 15 pp liberal gap.
70\% of Korean men in 20s perceive anti-male bias (2019 survey).
Birth rate < 1.0 (world’s lowest).
Gender wage gap: largest among OECD nations.
End of study notes.