CSUSB Student Workshops on AI Thoughtfulness and Ethics
Overview of AI Learning at CSUSB
- Students at California State University, San Bernardino (CSUSB) lead workshops focused on the thoughtful, ethical use of artificial intelligence (AI).
- The workshops aim to empower students across various disciplines to teach responsible AI usage, emphasizing control rather than fear or avoidance.
Central Themes of the Workshops
- Human Judgment in AI: The workshops center around the belief that human oversight and judgment remain crucial, implying that AI should not displace human expertise or responsibility.
- Key Questions for AI Use: Participants are encouraged to consider:
- How to use AI effectively
- When it is appropriate to use it
- What specific purposes AI should serve
- Shared Framework: The workshops utilize a framework highlighting:
- Verification of AI outputs
- Ethical considerations in AI application
- The necessity of critical thinking in AI-related tasks.
- AI is framed as a supportive tool, not as a replacement for knowledge or reasoning. It should be questioned, tested, and applied judiciously.
Presentations by Workshop Participants
Jonathan Muckelroy (Career Technical Education)
- Background: Credential candidate in adult education; Graduate in physical education.
- Approach: Utilized AI to support early drafting and brainstorming in kinesiology.
- Case Study:
- Students used AI to propose explanations for how moderate aerobic exercise might reduce perceived stress.
- Verification required through:
- Peer-reviewed sources
- Databases such as PubMed and guidelines from organizations like the American College of Sports Medicine.
- Outcome: Students categorized AI-generated content as verified, unclear, or removed, shifting focus from shortcuts to scientific judgment.
- Focus: Equity and bias within AI systems.
- Key Points:
- Explored how algorithmic tools can perpetuate disparities, notably in school discipline and student placement.
- Addressed practical queries regarding AI effectiveness:
- Who benefits from the system?
- Who is overlooked?
- How does data incompleteness cause issues?
- Positioning AI Literacy: As an equity issue emphasizing transparency and accountability.
Garrett Wulc (Mathematics Major)
- Focus: Technical analysis of AI in diagnosing machine learning workflow errors.
- Dataset Used: Airfoil data from NASA and UC Irvine.
- Findings: Displayed limitations of AI, addressing specifics of a baseline random forest model:
- Issues encountered:
- Improper cross-validation
- Data leakage
- AI suggestions were tested; some accepted, others rejected due to factors like:
- Computational costs
- Irrelevance
- Contextual fit
- Key Lesson: Confidence in AI outputs does not equate to accuracy.
Logan Ashbaugh (Graduate Student in Computer Science)
- Focus: Interaction between people and AI systems.
- Demonstration: Responded to sorting an algorithm with different prompt qualities:
- Vague prompts led to misleading conclusions whereas precise prompts enhanced relevance.
- Emphasis: Importance of understanding AI-generated content and verifying against established knowledge.
- Framing AI Literacy: As a skill linked to judgment rather than mere consumption of technology.
Jannatul Faika (Graduate Student)
- Focus: Debugging scenarios with chatbots.
- Presentation: Showed how AI explanations may be confidently incorrect due to missing context.
- Methodology: Used:
- Manual testing to compare outputs.
- Refinement of prompts to highlight human oversight in revealing AI blind spots.
- Conclusion: Reinforced the idea that while AI can assist, human responsibility governs decisions and outcomes.
Conclusion of Workshops
- The presentations collectively proposed a cross-disciplinary model advocating for responsible AI use.
- Learning approach emphasizes deep engagement with technology and critical questioning of AI applications, showcasing student empowerment in exploring emerging tools.