Hegemonic Masculinity
James Messershmidt (1993):
Males socialised into behaviours that lead to increased levels of criminality
Messerschmidt argues that masculinity is a social construction and that the dominant form of masculinity can cause criminal behaviours
Hegemonic Masculinity:
Males are socialised into being providers
Socialised into showing dominance over others
Physical strength is valued over intellect
Heterosexuality bordering on misogyny
Image is reinforced through media
Young males are bombarded with images of what a 'real man' is
Reinforced through these males being seen as desirable to women
How does this cause crime?
Socialisation into hegemonic masculinity leads to males reacting to perceived challenges to their position
In education, male pupils react to being treated as subordinate to teachers
In employment, reactions to employers having positions of authority
Challenges to masculinity at home - domestic violence
Applications of Hegemonic Masculinity?
Young males see physicality rather than intellect as pathways to achieving goals
Representation of masculinity in youth cultures as risk-taking and physical prowess - e.g. gang cultures
Laddish and anti-school subcultures
Evaluations:
Changing nature of masculinity - intellect, sensitivity, compassion
Social class divisions in concepts of hegemonic masculinity and socialisation
Creates conflict with concepts such as feminism which is seen as a challenge to masculinity
Links to concepts such as 'toxic masculinity'