Foundational Documents and Supreme Court Cases

Required Foundational Documents

  • The Declaration of Independence: A 1776 document asserting the American colonies' separation from British rule and outlining the principles of individual rights and government by consent.

  • The Articles of Confederation: The first constitution of the United States, adopted in 1781, which created a weak federal government and ultimately proved ineffective in governing the nation.

  • The Constitution of the United States: Ratified in 1788, this document established the framework for the U.S. government, outlining the structure, powers, and responsibilities of its branches, and protecting individual liberties through the Bill of Rights.

  • Federalist No. 10: An essay written by James Madison arguing that a large republic can best control factions and protect minority rights through a system of representation and checks and balances.

  • Brutus No. 1: An argumentative essay against the Constitution, emphasizing the dangers of a centralized government and advocating for more power to be retained by the states.

  • Federalist No. 51: An essay by James Madison discussing the separation of powers and checks and balances as necessary to prevent government tyranny and ensure liberty.

  • Federalist No. 70: An essay by Alexander Hamilton advocating for a single, strong executive as necessary for effective governance and accountability.

  • Federalist No. 78: An essay by Alexander Hamilton discussing the judiciary's role in interpreting the laws and the importance of an independent judiciary in maintaining the rule of law.

  • Letter from a Birmingham Jail: A letter written by Martin Luther King Jr. addressing civil disobedience, injustice, and the moral responsibility to challenge unjust laws.

Required Supreme Court Cases

  • Marbury v. Madison (1803): A landmark case that established the principle of judicial review, allowing the Supreme Court to declare laws unconstitutional.

  • McCulloch v. Maryland (1819): A decision affirming the federal government's implied powers and the supremacy of federal laws over state laws.

  • Schenck v. United States (1919): A case establishing the "clear and present danger" test for limitations on free speech during wartime.

  • Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954): A landmark decision declaring racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional, overturning Plessy v. Ferguson.

  • Baker v. Carr (1961): A case that established the principle of one person, one vote, ruling that federal courts can intervene in redistricting cases.

  • Engel v. Vitale (1962): A decision finding that school-sponsored prayer violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

  • Gideon v. Wainwright (1963): A case requiring that states provide counsel to defendants in criminal cases who cannot afford an attorney, reinforcing the right to a fair trial.

  • Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969): A decision affirming students' rights to free speech in public schools, as long as it does not disrupt educational activities.

  • New York Times Company v. United States (1971): A landmark case affirming the freedom of the press, ruling against prior restraint of publications in cases of national security.

  • Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972): A decision that recognized the right of Amish parents to educate their children at home, prioritizing religious freedom over state education requirements.

  • Shaw v. Reno (1993): A ruling that redistricting based solely on racial criteria must meet strict scrutiny standards under the Equal Protection Clause.

  • United States v. Lopez (1995): A case limiting Congress's power under the Commerce Clause, ruling that the Gun-Free School Zones Act exceeded federal authority.

  • McDonald v. Chicago (2010): A decision affirming that the Second Amendment applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, guaranteeing the right to bear arms.

  • Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010): A landmark ruling declaring that corporate funding of independent political broadcasts cannot be limited, protecting free speech under the First Amendment.