Cognitive-Behavioural Conceptualisation of Anorexia Nervosa
Treatment Outcome
Diagnosis of AN
Refusal to maintain weight at least 85% of expected weight.
Intense fear of gaining weight, even when underweight.
Disturbance in body image perception.
A criteria of a BMI < 17.5 is often also used as part of a cutoff for Anorexia.
The presence of amenorrhea (included in DSM-IV) is increasingly recognised as neither useful or relevant in diagnosis of AN (Surgenor et al., 2003)
(APA, 2013)
Prevalence
0.5% lifetime prevalence in females
10x more common in females than males
Onset typically in mid to late adolescence
Highly variable course and outcome
Body Mass Index (BMI)
<15.0 Extreme
15.0–16.0 Severe
16.0–17.0 Moderate
>17.0 Mild
<17.5 Extremely Underweight
17.5–18.5 Underweight
18.5–25.0 Normal
25.0–30.0 Overweight
>30.0 Obese
Common AN Characteristics
Anorexia Nervosa is often complicated by other traits and psychopathology that complicate the picture.
Depression and anxiety symptoms
Obsessional features
Perfectionism
Low self-esteem
Social withdrawal
Physical complications
Lack of insight into / acceptance of need for treatment (Wilson & Fairburn, 2002)
Mortality in Anorexia Nervosa
Crude mortality rates for AN range between 0% and 20%
More sophisticated analyses of mortality estimate rates of 0.56% per year (Sullivan, 1995)
Mortality for females age 15-24 = 0.0045% per year
Mortality for female psychiatric inpatients = 0.021% per year
Suicide rate in general population = 0.00002% per year
Predictors of mortality in AN (Keel et al., 2003)
Severity of alcohol use and substance use were correlated with mortality
A regression model incorporating Duration of Illness, Affective Disorder During Hospitalization, Suicidality, and Severity of Alcohol Abuse was significant in predicting mortality.
CBT Conceptualisation of AN
Earliest application of Beck’s CT principles to AN in early 1980s (Garner & Bemis, 1982)
Vitousek (1997)
Overvalued ideas about personal implications of body shape and weight originating out of personality variables such as perfectionism, etc.
Sense of Control (Slade, 1982)
Stressed need for control as central feature of AN
Success in dieting reinforces sense of control
The complex nature of control in AN is elaborated in Surgenor (2002, 2003)
CBT Theory of AN Onset
Onset of the Disorder
Need for self-control in context of low-self esteem, perfectionism, and sense of ineffectiveness
Control over eating is focused on as an experience of success/control
Dietary restriction provides immediate evidence of self-control
Control over body shape/weight especially salient to ascetics
Controlling eating has a strong effect on those in the environment, which may already be clouded with dysfunctional relationships
Controlling eating provides a mechanism of arresting or reversing pubertal changes
Western society values dieting to control shape and weight. (Fairburn, Shafran & Cooper, 1999)
CBT Theory of AN Maintenance
Dietary restriction enhances the sense of being in control
Amount eaten, types of foods, times of eating
Success at dietary restriction is a potent reinforcer
Control over eating as expression of control and worth
Aspects of starvation encourage further dietary restriction
Hunger perceived as threat to control over eating
Impaired concentration may heighten sense of chaos/uncontrollability
Extreme concerns about shape and weight encourage dietary restriction
Especially prominent in Western society (Fairburn, Shafran & Cooper, 1999)
The Thin Commandments
If you aren't thin you aren't attractive.
Being thin is more important than being healthy.
You must buy clothes, cut your hair, take laxatives, starve yourself, do anything to make yourself look thinner.
Thou shall not eat without feeling guilty.
Thou shall not eat fattening food without punishing oneself afterwards.
Thou shall count calories and restrict intake accordingly.
What the scale says is the most important thing.
Losing weight is good/gaining weight is bad.
You can never be too thin.
Being thin and not eating are signs of true will power and success.
(http://www.proanorexia.ca/thincommandments.html)
Outcome of Treatment of AN
Steinhausen (2002)
Meta-analysis of 119 patient cohorts
Total of 5590 patients
Variety of different treatment methods.
Differences between treatments not assessed
Mean dropout rate of 12.3% across all studies. (Steinhausen, 2002)
Predictors of Outcome
Note that there was considerable heterogeneity among the different studies used in the Steinhausen (2002) meta-analysis.
Factors unrelated to outcome / with inconsistent findings