The internet has revolutionized business practices.
Mobile devices now facilitate e-commerce, expanding beyond traditional computers.
Early computer law focused on hardware and software contracts; now, IT law encompasses much more.
In the 1980s and 1990s, Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) was considered the future of electronic trade, but the internet changed this.
EDI involves online communication between business partners with closed economic relationships, such as suppliers.
Efforts were made to standardize communication formats to improve EDI viability, including international initiatives by the UN Economic Commission for Europe and the SA Foreign Trade Organisation (SAFTO) in South Africa.
EDI became less relevant as the internet enabled diverse communication methods.
The internet facilitates the sale of various items and services, supported by secure payment methods for international trade.
Online shopping eliminates the need for physical interaction.
Digital products and subscriptions (e.g., Kindle, Spotify) are available without physical delivery, alongside physical goods.
Logistics have improved, with drone deliveries being explored.
COVID-19 significantly boosted e-commerce, with an estimated 74% growth during the pandemic.
Online transactions involve private, commercial, criminal, and international law.
E-commerce raises issues such as intellectual property, privacy, data protection, delict, consumer protection, and defamation.
Criminal concerns include fraud, identity theft, revenge porn, child abuse, and copyright issues.
Blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies have further transformed e-commerce.
Increased spam poses challenges in controlling unwanted advertising.
South African legislation like ECTA, CPA, and POPIA addresses spam.
The rapid growth of EDI and the internet led to concerns about whether existing laws adequately protected individuals and regulated contracts.
Key issues in e-commerce include:
Validity of agreements
Offer and acceptance
Automated contracts and agency
Time and place of contracting
Formalities
Incorporation of standard terms
Jurisdiction
Applicable law
Internationally, UNCITRAL (United Nations Commission for International Trade Law) provided guidance with its Model Law.
The Model Law offers acceptable solutions but is not binding.
Chapter III of South Africa's ECTA is based on the UNCITRAL Model Law.
UNCITRAL's convention includes the United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts, 2005.
The Model Law emphasizes functional equivalence:
\text{Functional Equivalence} = \text{meeting the purposes of paper-based requirements electronically}
It promotes legal neutrality regarding communication modes, ensuring equivalent requirements and consequences.
In Europe, the Directive on Electronic Commerce aimed for a uniform approach across the EU.
It sought to prevent fragmentation caused by varying case law in different countries.
The directive ensures the validity and binding nature of electronic contracts.
It requires countries to adapt their legislation to align with the directive, without providing specific solutions.
Fragmentation persists in Europe 20 years after the directive, indicating a need for reform.
In South Africa, ECTA's Chapter III adopts UNCITRAL Model Law principles.
Several African countries have also implemented legislation based on the Model Law.
This promotes a harmonized approach to e-commerce law in the region.
Freedom to contract is based on two main principles:
Flexibility to negotiate and create contracts tailored to specific needs and circumstances.
Absence of specific formalities unless required by legislation or agreed upon by the parties.
ECTA states that a data message shall not be without legal force and effect merely because it is in the form of data.
Contracts can be concluded via electronic data messages, unless formalities dictate otherwise.
A key requirement is the communication method's capability to adequately convey the parties' intent to be bound.
Electronic Signatures are accepted.
The offeree must unconditionally accept the offer made by the offeror.
Acceptance must mirror the offer without any additional terms or conditions.
Conflicting or additional terms constitute a rejection of the original offer and are considered a counter-offer.
Information theory in contract law requires actual conscious agreement between parties.
The offeror must be aware of the acceptance before consensus is reached.
In e-commerce, the application depends on the communication type.
Faxes, emails, SMS, and websites are considered indirect communications.
Direct forms of communication:
Telephonic communications
Voice communications (excluded from ECTA unless used in automated transactions)
Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP)
When direct communications fall outside ECTA's scope, general contract rules apply.
Offer and acceptance become valid when the accepting person has subjective knowledge.
The risk of communication failure (e.g., broken answering machine) generally lies with the offeree.
Using indirect communication methods requires clear authorization; otherwise, it's not permitted.
If the offer is made through indirect communication, implied authorization is given to the addressee to use the same method for acceptance.
The party using indirect communication bears the risk.
Advertisements are generally considered invitations to do business, not offers.
Displaying items in a store window or on a shelf is an invitation to do business.
Customers make an offer to buy when presenting goods at the till.
Websites generally serve as invitations to do business unless explicitly stated otherwise.
Website owners can stipulate that displayed goods do not constitute an offer and that customer responses are offers subject to acceptance or confirmation.
Goods/services are displayed with prices.
Customers indicate desired items and add them to a cart.
Customers click a "buy" button or similar to initiate the purchase.
The website requests payment information.
Upon receiving payment confirmation, the sale is confirmed (acceptance).
Automated contracts and mistake
EDI and interchange agreements
Smart contracts
Time and place concerning a contract
Formalities
Incorporation by reference (“click wrap”)
Principles and concepts that concern contracts in e-commerce applied to scenarios provided.
Automated contracts are formed through automated systems (e.g., online purchases, smart contracts).
ECTA validates contracts concluded by electronic means, including automated systems, without needing direct human involvement.
ECTA Protection (Section 20(e)):
If a natural person makes a mistake in an electronic communication and cannot correct it, they may rescind the contract.
Notification of the mistake must be given as soon as possible.
If correction opportunities exist (e.g., confirmation screens), the contract remains valid.
EDI automates the exchange of business documents between organizations (e.g., invoices, purchase orders).
It enhances efficiency by automating transactions, reducing errors, and speeding up processing.
ECTA acknowledges EDI as a valid form of electronic communication for contract formation.
Interchange Agreements are legal agreements outlining rights, responsibilities, and security measures.
Key aspects include:
Standards & Protocols: Specifies formats, encryption, and transmission methods.
Liability & Risk: Defines accountability for errors, system failures, or fraud.
Dispute Resolution: Establishes how conflicts over transactions will be resolved.
Confidentiality & Security: Ensures data protection and compliance with laws.
Self-executing contracts coded on blockchain technology.
Execution:
Automatically executes actions (e.g., transferring funds, verifying transactions) when predefined conditions are met.
Features:
Automation: Eliminates intermediaries.
Transparency: Terms and execution are publicly verifiable on the blockchain.
Security: Cryptographic protection reduces fraud and tampering risks.
Efficiency: Faster and more cost-effective than traditional contracts.
Legality:
Many jurisdictions, including South Africa, are developing regulations.
Challenges:
Error Handling: Code bugs can cause unintended consequences.
Enforceability: Interpreting smart contracts under traditional legal systems can be complex.
Contract formation requires completed offer and acceptance.
Timing varies by communication method:
Traditional Contracts (Face-to-Face & Telephone):
Concluded immediately upon acceptance.
Postal Rule (Non-Instantaneous Communication):
Formed when the acceptance letter is posted.
Applies unless explicitly excluded.
Electronic Contracts (ECTA Section 22(1)):
Concluded when acceptance is received by the offeror's system.
Automatic receipts conclude the contract when sent.
Location determines governing laws and courts:
Traditional Contracts:
Formed where acceptance is communicated to the offeror.
Electronic Contracts (ECTA Section 22(2)):
Concluded where the offeror's system is located.
Important for cross-border transactions.
Contracts require certain formalities for validity and enforceability.
Generally, contracts need not be in writing unless required by law or agreed upon.
Contracts Required in Writing:
Contracts for the sale of land
Suretyship agreements
Credit agreements
Contracts Requiring Notarization or Registration:
Antenuptial contracts (must be in writing, signed, notarized, and registered)
Electronic Contracts (ECTA compliance):
Valid unless specifically excluded (e.g., Wills, sale of immovable property).
Contracts include terms from another document without fully restating them.
Click-wrap agreements require users to accept terms by clicking an "I Agree" button.
Key Components:
User Consent: Active acceptance of terms before proceeding.
Reference to External Terms: Hyperlinked terms available elsewhere.
Legal Recognition:
Enforceable if users had a reasonable opportunity to review the terms.
Challenges:
Issues arise if terms are unclear, hidden, or acceptance is automatic without user action.