Stuttering Notes

What We Know Thus Far

  • Stuttering exists in all cultures throughout all time periods.
  • Normal fluency requires the smooth integration between cognitive and motoric processes.
  • Not all disfluencies equal stuttering.

The Respiration Process in Stuttering

  • Attempts to speak during inhalation.
  • Complete stoppage in respiration.
  • Irregular (consecutive) respiratory cycles.
  • Exhalation interrupted by inhalation.
  • Higher incidence of thoracic breathing.
  • Prolonged inhalations and exhalations.

The Phonatory Process in Stuttering

  • Fluttering and abnormal vocal fold (VF) cycles (vibration).
  • High levels of laryngeal muscular activation.
  • Slow in the initiation of phonation.
  • Vocal folds are abducted during part-word repetitions.

Articulation in the Stutter

  • Increased muscular tension.
  • Jumps or violent muscular activity.
  • Synchronization between antagonistic muscle pairs is defective.

Aerodynamics of Stuttering

  • A gradual elevation of air pressure.
  • Increased intraoral pressure without airflow (silent blocks on stops).
  • Prolonged airflow with breathy sounds.

Incidence and Prevalence

  • Prevalence: The estimate of all the cases of the disorder at a given time.
  • Incidence: The probability that new cases of any disorder will develop over a period of time.
  • Importance for SLPs: Understanding the who, when, and length of stuttering.

Incidence Factors

  • (a) Occurrence
  • (b) Age
  • (c) Gender
  • (d) Genetics
  • (e) Stressors
  • (f) Concomitant disorders
  • (g) Persistency-recovery
  • (h) Subtypes
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) - Ehud Yairi, Ph.D., University of Illinois.

Prevalence, Incidence, and Age

  • Andrews (1984) (Incidence):
    • 0.500.50 reduction in the risk of stuttering by age 4.
    • 0.750.75 by age 6.
    • Most by age 12.
  • Steady prevalence between 1st and 8th grade.
  • Prevalence decreases with age.

Prevalence Details

  • Lower than 1%1\% (Craig et al., 2002), with an actual incidence of approximately 5%5\%, onsets mainly at the preschool age (Andrews & Harris, 1964; Manson, 2000).
  • 1%1\% prevalence is an average for the population at large.
  • Prevalence varies greatly according to age groups.
  • More than 3,000 preschool children study:
    • Revealed a 2.43%2.43\% stuttering prevalence with no racial or ethnic differences (Proctor et al., 2002; Yairi & Ambrose, 2005).

Prevalence in Young Children

  • Prevalence at any point in time: up to almost 2.5%2.5\% percent of children under age 5 stutter.

Prevalence Compared to Other Communication Disorders

  • ADHD: 0.030.050.03-0.05 in children and adults.
  • Articulation Disorders:
    • Preschoolers: 0.100.150.10-0.15
    • School aged: 0.060.06
  • ASD/Pervasive Developmental Disorder: 0.010.020.01-0.02
  • Aphasia: (0.37)(0.37)
  • Intellectual Disability: 0.010.030.01-0.03
  • Language Learning Disability: 0.150.200.15-0.20
  • Reading Disorders: 0.160.16

Incidence vs. Prevalence

  • Spontaneous recovery is not the same as sudden.
  • Incidence encompasses all those who have stuttered.

Spontaneous Recovery Influences

  • Age
  • Family History
  • Gender
  • Secondary behaviors
  • Severity
  • Stimulability

Spontaneous Recovery Study

  • Andrews & Harris study:
    • Longitudinal study found a 79.1%79.1\% spontaneous recovery rate.
    • Higher the age surveyed, the higher recovery rate.
    • Structured interview- and sentence-completion data were gathered (University of California, Berkeley).
    • Thirty-two spontaneously recovered stutterers were compared with 32 active stutterers and normal controls.
  • Findings:
    • Four out of five recover from stuttering spontaneously.
    • Fewer of those who had received public school speech therapy recovered from stuttering.
    • There appear to be many different paths to recovery.

More Spontaneous Recovery Findings

  • Fewer of those who had ever been severe recovered spontaneously.
  • No familial incidence pattern with either group of stutterers as compared to controls.
  • No differences in reported handedness in stutterers or their families.
  • Improvement attributed to self-acceptance and role acceptance.
  • There appear to be many different paths to recovery.

Spontaneous Recovery Estimates

  • Other estimates vary from 0.360.830.36-0.83 recover without treatment (Lankford and Cooper, 1974).
  • Lankford and Cooper (1974):
    • 68 self-identified stutterers (high school students).
    • 0.660.66 of the parents (telephone interview): their child never stuttered.
    • Those older than 15:
      • 0.250.25 of those who stuttered at age 10 recovered by 16.
      • 0.500.50 who stuttered at age 6 recovered by 16.
      • 0.750.75 who stuttered at 4 had recovered by 16.

Groups/Disordered Populations or History

  • Brain injury/not TBI: CP = 0.020.02 & epilepsy: 3.23.2
  • Cleft Palate < 0.20.2
  • Down Syndrome 0.150.530.15-0.53
  • Familial incidence 0.460.46 have family who stutters
  • Hearing impaired 0.050.05
  • Intellectual disability 2.52.5 to 0.170.17
  • Down Syndrome 0.150.530.15-0.53
  • Males more than females 0.750.75
  • Psychosis 0.280.28

Impact

  • Professional education and practice
    • Education and clinical practicum
  • Clinical interventions
    • Most do not specialize in stuttering, as a rule
    • When do we intervene and provide treatment?
      • Mild or severe 3 year old?
      • An adult?
  • Research results vary based on:
    • Age
    • Gender
    • Models
  • Public awareness and education

What We Know Thus Far

  • Factors that affect recovery:
    • Age
    • Gender
    • Onset date
    • Severity
    • Family History
  • Recovery rates are studied by incidence and prevalence studies
    • Incidence
    • Prevalence
  • General un-coordination of speech system