psych106 week 1

Lecture Overview & Learning Objectives

  • Topic: Motivation & Procrastination (delivered at the start of semester)

  • Lecturer’s humour: procrastinated writing a talk about procrastination → personal learning experience

  • After completing the class, students should be able to:

    • Define motivation in the simplest terms

    • Describe key psychological theories of motivation (historical ➜ modern)

    • Distinguish intrinsic vs extrinsic motivation

    • Identify causes & consequences of procrastination

    • Apply theories to their own academic / personal contexts


Defining Motivation

  • “Internal process that initiates, directs & sustains goal-directed behaviour.”

    • Explains actions from basic (eating) to complex (studying for a degree)

  • 3 core components (often tested):

    1. Direction – choice of goal/path (e.g., study group vs Netflix)

    2. Intensity – amount of effort (e.g., 10 h vs 1 h study)

    3. Persistence – duration despite obstacles (e.g., marathoner training in winter)


Why Motivation Matters

  • Central to psychology: understanding & shaping behaviour

  • Supports mental well-being, confidence, personal development

  • Low motivation ⇒ feelings of boredom, meaninglessness, poor performance & satisfaction


Two Families of Motivation Theories

  1. Content Theorieswhat energises people (needs & drives)

    • Maslow’s Hierarchy, Alderfer’s ERG, etc.

  2. Process Theorieshow motivation operates (cognitive & behavioural mechanisms)

    • Goal-Setting, Self-Determination, Behaviourism, etc.

    • Analogy: content = fuel ; process = engine


Historical Perspectives (Quick Timeline)

  • Ancient Greece (Aristotle) → Hedonism: seek pleasure, avoid pain

  • Enlightenment (1600–1700s)

    • Thomas Hobbes: humans act from self-interest to avoid pain

    • John Locke: born tabula rasa; pleasure/pain learned via experience

    • Both influential yet untested empirically

  • Early Psychology (1800s–early 1900s)

    • Instinct theories (William James): curiosity, fear, jealousy, belonging all innate

    • Sigmund Freud: life (Eros) & death (Thanatos) instincts → include aggression & self-preservation

    • Animal analogies: ducklings follow mother; migrating birds; infant grasp/root reflexes


Content Theories in Detail

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs (1943)
Self-Actualisation   ← self-fulfilment
Esteem Needs         ← psychological
Belonging/Love ≈---------------------
Safety Needs         ← basic
Physiological Needs  ← basic
  • Lower levels must be satisfied before higher needs become motivational

  • Student lens:

    • Physiological: rest, nutrition, health → focus & engagement

    • Safety: housing, finances, campus safety

    • Belonging: study groups, lecture attendance → community

    • Esteem: constructive feedback, recognition

    • Self-actualisation: learning for pure enjoyment (intrinsic)

Alderfer’s ERG Theory (1969)
  • Existence ≈ physiological + safety

  • Relatedness ≈ belonging + partial esteem

  • Growth ≈ self-actualisation + remaining esteem

  • Key upgrades to Maslow:

    • Needs can be pursued simultaneously; strict hierarchy not required

    • Frustration–Regression principle: blockage at a higher level may redirect effort to lower needs (e.g., academic setback → seek friendship support)


Process Theories

Goal-Setting Theory (Locke & Latham, 1990)
  • Performance influenced by:

    • Direction of attention

    • Effort invested

    • Persistence maintained

    • Strategy development

  • 5 Goal features (C-C-C-F-T):

    1. Clarity – specific, unambiguous (e.g., “raise grade by 15\%”)

    2. Challenge – difficult yet attainable (not “cure world hunger” solo)

    3. Commitment – personal buy-in essential

    4. Feedback – ongoing tracking/evaluation

    5. Task Complexity – allocate adequate time & resources

  • Foundation for SMART goals (see later)

Self-Determination Theory – SDT (Deci & Ryan, 1985-2000s)
  • Considered “gold-standard” contemporary theory

  • Human growth & optimal function require satisfaction of 3 innate needs:

    1. Autonomy – sense of volition/control (e.g., choosing essay topic)

    2. Competence – feeling effective; mastery + constructive feedback

    3. Relatedness – connectedness & belonging (peer community)

  • When needs met → greater intrinsic & autonomous extrinsic motivation; when thwarted → disengagement

  • Classroom experiment: 3 000-word ungraded optional essay vs 1 000-word graded essay → majority choose latter ⇒ shows role of extrinsic drivers


Intrinsic vs Extrinsic Motivation

Feature

Intrinsic

Extrinsic

Source

Internal satisfaction, curiosity, pride

External rewards or pressures

Examples

Learning for fun, creative hobby

Grades, pay, praise, avoiding penalties

Sustainability

Long-term, self-sustaining

Short-term unless rewards continue

Best for

Complex, creative tasks

Routine or clearly goal-based tasks

SDT Motivation Continuum (Taxonomy)
A-Motivation → External → Introjected → Identified → Integrated → Intrinsic
 ^controlled                                                       ^autonomous
  • A-motivation: no perceived value/competence

  • External Regulation: reward/punishment driven

  • Introjected: internal pressures (guilt, ego)

  • Identified: personal importance recognised

  • Integrated: aligns with core values; part of identity

  • Intrinsic: inherent interest/enjoyment


Behaviourism / Reinforcement Theories

Operant Conditioning (B. F. Skinner)
  • Motivation = consequences that follow behaviour (observable only)

  • Key contingencies:

    • Positive Reinforcement (+R) – add pleasant stimulus ← increases behaviour (e.g., praise for class participation)

    • Negative Reinforcement (–R) – remove unpleasant stimulus ← increases behaviour (e.g., cancel assignment if class performance high)

    • Positive Punishment (+P) – add unpleasant stimulus ← decreases behaviour (public reprimand for talking)

    • Negative Punishment (–P) – remove pleasant stimulus ← decreases behaviour (grade deduction for lateness)

    • Extinction – withholding reinforcement so behaviour fades (stop answering midnight emails ⇒ students stop sending)

  • Critique: explains maintenance/change, not origin of behaviour; ignores internal states


Goal-Setting in Practice

  • Humans are inherently goal-directed; even mundane daily plans are mini-goals

  • Effective goals are:

    • Specific & challenging

    • Self-selected or co-created

    • Realistic (self-effic