Authoritarian Legitimation and the Russo-Ukrainian War

Core Thesis and Research Questions

  • The 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine was driven by domestic interests, specifically the legitimation of Vladimir Putin's personalist autocracy, rather than pure geopolitical security gains.
  • The study addresses why Russia invaded and how Putin’s regime benefits from warfare through social support and the justification of repressive policies.

Analytical Framework: Authoritarian Legitimation

  • Three Pillars of Stability: Authoritarian regimes rely on repression, co-optation (economic distribution), and legitimation (Gerschewski, 2013).
  • Diversionary War Theory: Leaders initiate armed conflicts to distract from domestic woes, boost nationalism, and demonstrate competence (Oakes, 2012).
  • Securitization Theory: Threats are socially constructed by "securitizing agents" to justify "urgent measures" and executive expansion (Buzan et al., 1998).
  • Protection Pacts: Perceived threats allow elites and society to coalesce around an autocrat for security, reinforcing regime durability (Slater, 2010).

Domestic Drivers of Conflict in Russia

  • Economic Stagnation: Following the early 2000s economic boom, the 2010s saw downturns and weakened "authoritarian bargains."
  • Protest Instability: Major protests occurred in 2011 (electoral fraud), 2017 (corruption), and 2021 (imprisonment of Alexei Navalny).
  • "Rally 'round the Flag" Effect: Levada Center data shows Putin's approval ratings peak during conflicts, such as the Second Chechen War (1999–2000), the 2014 Ukrainian crisis, and the 2022 invasion.
  • Siege Mentality: The regime promotes the belief that Russia is surrounded by a hostile world to foster group solidarity.

The Securitization of Ukraine and the West

  • The "Collective West": NATO expansion and Western liberal values are framed as existential threats to Russian traditional values.
  • Historical Revisionism: Putin's 2021 article "On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians" argues Ukraine was an artificial creation of the Soviet era and a Western "anti-Russia" project.
  • Orange Revolution (2004): This event served as a catalyst for shifting the narrative from internal threats (Chechnya) to external threats (NATO/Ukraine).

Instrumentalization of Repression and the Siloviki

  • Repressive Legislation: The 2012 "foreign agents" law was used to crack down on NGOs like Memorial and oppositionists; a record 188 agents were registered in 2022.
  • Disinformation Laws: 2022 bills mandate the term "special military operation" and criminalize "disinformation" about the armed forces.
  • Militocracy: The conflict empowers the siloviki (security establishment), shifting influence away from business elites.
  • Institutional Confidence: 2022 ratings showed high trust in the president (80%80\%), the army (77%77\%), and security organs (61%61\%).

Evidence and Quantitative Data

  • New Russia Barometer (2007): Analysis shows the perception of the US as a threat significantly correlates with approval for dictatorship and Soviet nostalgia.
  • Presidential Addresses: Mentions of external threats in Putin's speeches rose to almost 30%30\% by 2023.
  • Detentions: Over 19,600 people were detained for anti-war stances between February 2022 and April 2023 (OVD-Info).