Authoritarian Legitimation and the Russo-Ukrainian War
Core Thesis and Research Questions
- The 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine was driven by domestic interests, specifically the legitimation of Vladimir Putin's personalist autocracy, rather than pure geopolitical security gains.
- The study addresses why Russia invaded and how Putin’s regime benefits from warfare through social support and the justification of repressive policies.
Analytical Framework: Authoritarian Legitimation
- Three Pillars of Stability: Authoritarian regimes rely on repression, co-optation (economic distribution), and legitimation (Gerschewski, 2013).
- Diversionary War Theory: Leaders initiate armed conflicts to distract from domestic woes, boost nationalism, and demonstrate competence (Oakes, 2012).
- Securitization Theory: Threats are socially constructed by "securitizing agents" to justify "urgent measures" and executive expansion (Buzan et al., 1998).
- Protection Pacts: Perceived threats allow elites and society to coalesce around an autocrat for security, reinforcing regime durability (Slater, 2010).
Domestic Drivers of Conflict in Russia
- Economic Stagnation: Following the early 2000s economic boom, the 2010s saw downturns and weakened "authoritarian bargains."
- Protest Instability: Major protests occurred in 2011 (electoral fraud), 2017 (corruption), and 2021 (imprisonment of Alexei Navalny).
- "Rally 'round the Flag" Effect: Levada Center data shows Putin's approval ratings peak during conflicts, such as the Second Chechen War (1999–2000), the 2014 Ukrainian crisis, and the 2022 invasion.
- Siege Mentality: The regime promotes the belief that Russia is surrounded by a hostile world to foster group solidarity.
The Securitization of Ukraine and the West
- The "Collective West": NATO expansion and Western liberal values are framed as existential threats to Russian traditional values.
- Historical Revisionism: Putin's 2021 article "On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians" argues Ukraine was an artificial creation of the Soviet era and a Western "anti-Russia" project.
- Orange Revolution (2004): This event served as a catalyst for shifting the narrative from internal threats (Chechnya) to external threats (NATO/Ukraine).
Instrumentalization of Repression and the Siloviki
- Repressive Legislation: The 2012 "foreign agents" law was used to crack down on NGOs like Memorial and oppositionists; a record 188 agents were registered in 2022.
- Disinformation Laws: 2022 bills mandate the term "special military operation" and criminalize "disinformation" about the armed forces.
- Militocracy: The conflict empowers the siloviki (security establishment), shifting influence away from business elites.
- Institutional Confidence: 2022 ratings showed high trust in the president (80%), the army (77%), and security organs (61%).
Evidence and Quantitative Data
- New Russia Barometer (2007): Analysis shows the perception of the US as a threat significantly correlates with approval for dictatorship and Soviet nostalgia.
- Presidential Addresses: Mentions of external threats in Putin's speeches rose to almost 30% by 2023.
- Detentions: Over 19,600 people were detained for anti-war stances between February 2022 and April 2023 (OVD-Info).