FL CON LAW
- HOMESTEAD:
- RULE
- PROTECTION FROM FORCED SALE FROM CREDITORS.
- MUST BE:
- PRIMARY RESIDENCE OWNED BY A NATURAL PERSON.
- RULE
- HOMESTEAD:
LEGAL DOMICILE.
$1K PERSONAL PROPERTY IS PROTECTED.
- FILED ON TIME.
WITH THE CLERK'S OFFICE BEFORE THE CREDITOR'S CLAIM.
- ACRE REQUIREMENT.
1/2 ACRE CONTINUOUS INSIDE.
160 ACRE CONTINUOUS OUTSIDE.
- SUPER CREDITOR EXCEPTION:
- MORTGAGES, PROPERTY TAX, MECHANIC'S LIENS CAN GO AFTER PROPERTY.
- ABANDONMENT
- OWNER LEAVES THE PROPERTY, AND EXPRESS AN INTENT NOT TO RETURN.
- CAN LOSE HOMESTEAD PROTECTION AND CREDITORS CAN GO AFTER THE PROPERTY.
- OWNER LEAVES THE PROPERTY, AND EXPRESS AN INTENT NOT TO RETURN.
- DEVISE
- CANNOT DEVISE HOMESTEAD IF THERE IS A SURVIVING SPOUSE AND/OR A MINOR CHILD.
- SURVIVING SPOUSE GETS A LIFE ESTATE.
- MINOR GETS REMAINDER.
- CANNOT DEVISE HOMESTEAD IF THERE IS A SURVIVING SPOUSE AND/OR A MINOR CHILD.
- AD VALOREM TAX
- PROPERTY TAXES AND TAXES ON YOUR TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY.
- PAY TAXES TO THE LOCAL COUNTY GOV.
- NOT TO THE STATE.
- NO STATE INCOME TAX IN FLORIDA.
- ONLY FEDERAL INCOME TAX.
- HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION FROM PROPERTY TAXES:
- TWO 25K EXEMPTIONS COMES OFF THE PROPERTY VALUE.
- SUPER CREDITOR EXCEPTION:
50K.
- RATE:
- PROPERTY TAXES ARE CALCULATED BY MILLAGE RATE.
- THE RATE WILL BE UNIFORMED ACROSS ALL OF THE HOMES.
- PORTABILITY:
- THE AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION VALUE IS IN ONE RESIDENCE IS PORTABLE TO ANOTHER RESIDENCE.
- GOV OWNS PROPERTY:
- IF THE GOV OWNS PROPERTY, AND THEY ARE USING IT FOR GOV PURPOSES, THAT PROPERTYIS EXEMPT FROM AD VALOREM TAXES.
- RATE:
HOWEVER, IF SOME OF THAT IS LEASED/RENTED TO A PRIVATE-PROFIT MAKING PURPOSES, WILL BE TAXED.
- CONSTITUTIONALITY OF BILL:
- STATE LEGISLATURE
- REGULAR v. SPECIAL SESSION:
- REGULAR SESSION.
- REGULAR v. SPECIAL SESSION:
- STATE LEGISLATURE
- CONSTITUTIONALITY OF BILL:
LASTS 60 DAYS.
- GOVERNOR CALLS SPECIAL SESSIONS.
LASTS 20 DAYS.
SINGLE ISSUE.
ONLY PASS LAWS IN THE PURVIEW OF THE SPECIAL SESSION PROCLAMATION.
- BILL
- HAS TO PASS EACH HOUSE BY MAJORITY VOTE.
- BECOMES LAW WHEN:
- BILL
GOVERNOR SIGNS THE BILL OR
DOESN’T VETO WITHIN 7 DAYS.
- 10th AMENDMENT
- STATE HAS POLICE POWER HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE, AND MORALS OF THE CITIZENS.
- FORMALITY
- TITLE.
- ENACTMENT CLAUSE.
- "BE IT ENACTED THAT, …"
- VALID PURPOSE.
- REASONABILITY RELATED TO THE PUBLIC WELFARE.
- SINGLE SUBJECT RULE.
- THERE CANNOT BE ANY "LOG-ROLLING."
- CANNOT BE VAGUE.
- CLEAR ENOUGH SO AN AVERAGE PERSON CAN UNDERSTAND.
- SEPARATION OF POWERS
- ONE BRANCH CANNOT ENCROACH ON ANOTHER BRANCH’S POWERS.
- THE FL CONSTITUTION EXPRESSLY INCORPORATES THE POWERS BE SEPARATED.
- QUASI = LOOKS LIKE.
- ONE BRANCH CANNOT ENCROACH ON ANOTHER BRANCH’S POWERS.
- TYPES OF LAW
- GENERAL:
- APPLIES TO EVERYONE UNIFORMLY.
- SPECIAL:
- APPLIES TO SPECIFIC GROUP OR GEOGRAPHIC AREA.
- GENERAL LAW OF LOCAL APPLICATION:
- AREAS W/ SPECIFIC POPULATION.
- GENERAL:
- 10th AMENDMENT
EX: 55+.
- CHARTERED VS NONCHARTED COUNTY
- COUNTY IS MAKING THEIR OWN LAW.
- HOME RULE POWER:
- ALLOWS COUNTIES TO MAKE RULES FOR THEMSELVES.
- CHARTER:
- BROAD POWER.
- AS LONG AS ITS NOT INCONSISTENT W ANY GENERAL LAW.
- NON-CHARTER:
- NARROW POWER.
- CANT DO ANYTHING THEMSELVES.
- CHARTERED VS NONCHARTED COUNTY
NEEDS POWER FROM STATE.
- STANDING
- DISTINCT PERSONAL INJURY.
- EQUAL PROTECTION
- GROUP/CLASS OF PEOPLE BEING TREATED DIFFERENTLY.
- SCRUTINY:
- STRICT:
- STANDING
RACE, RELIGION, NATIONALITY, AND PHYSICAL DISABILITY.
GOV HAS BURDEN TO SHOW THAT THE LAW IS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE COMPELLING INTEREST.
- RATIONAL BASIS:
ILLEGITIMACY/GENDER.
THE FLORIDA COURTS HAVE NOT APPLIED THE INTERMEDIATE SCRUTINY TEST IN EQUAL PROTECTION CASES.
EVERYONE ELSE.
P HAS BURDEN TO PROVE THAT THE LAW IS NOT RATIONALLY RELATED TO LEGITIMATE STATE INTEREST.
- DUE PROCESS
- ALL TREATING THE SAME.
- TAKING AWAY OR RESTRICTING LIFE, LIBERTY, OR PROPERTY.
- SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS:
- LIBERTY RIGHTS:
- DUE PROCESS
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT:
INTERSTATE TRAVEL.
SPEECH.
VOTE.
RIGHT TO WORK.
RIGHT TO PRIVACY:
RIGHT TO BE LEFT ALONE. ANY INTRUSION IS SUBJECT TO STRICT SCRUTINY.
CONTRACEPTION.
ABORTION.
MARRIAGE.
PROCREATION.
EDUCATION.
RAISE FAMILY.
BEFORE THE RIGHT OF PRIVACY ATTACHES, HOWEVER, A REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY MUST EXIST.
NON-FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT:
SUBJECT TO RATIONAL BASIS.
- PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS
- PROPERTY RIGHTS:
- PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS
GOV JOB.
LICENSES
BENEFITS.
- RIGHT TO A NOTICE + HEARING.
- SPEECH
- CANNOT BAN SPEECH.
- CAN REGULATE SPEECH.
- CONTENT-BASED:
- GOV STOPS MESSAGE.
- STRICT SCRUTINY.
- CONTENT-NEUTRAL:
- GOV REGULATES TIME, PLACE. MANNER.
WHEN, WHERE, & HOW?
- FURTHER SIGNIFICANT GOV INTEREST.
- LEAVE OPEN ALTERNATE MEANS OF COMMUNICATION.
A FORM OF INTERMEDIATE SCRUTINY.
- RELIGION
- FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE:
- HOW TO PRACTICE RELIGION.
- GOV MUST REMAIN NEUTRAL.
- FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE:
- RELIGION
IF THE INTENT IS NEUTRAL, BUT THE EFFECT ISN'T, THAT’S OKAY.
- ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE:
- GOV CANNOT ESTABLIGH A RELIGION.
- TEST:
- ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE:
SECULAR PURPOSE.
CANNOT PROMOTE/INHIBIT RELIGION.
INCONSISTENT WITH PUBLIC MORALS, PEACE, OR SAFETY.
SHALL BE NO EXCESSIVE ENTANGLEMENT.
($).
LINK PURPOSE WITH ENTANGLEMENT.
- ACCESS TO COURTS
- NO LAW CAN DENY ACCESS TO COURTS.
- RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL
- NO LAW CAN DENY JURY TRAIL.
- JURY TRIAL NOT AVAILABLE IN:
- NO LAW CAN DENY JURY TRAIL.
- ACCESS TO COURTS
CIVIL COMMITMENT,
EMINENT DOMAIN, OR
PROCEEDINGS SEEKING EQUITABLE RELIEF.
- SUNSHINE LAW
- GOV ACTIVITY HAS TO BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.
- EXCEPT:
- GOV ACTIVITY HAS TO BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.
- SUNSHINE LAW
WITH RESPECT TO RECORDS SPECIFICALLY MADE CONFIDENTIAL BY THE CONSTITUTION.
- CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
- MIRANDA
- AFFORDED WARNINGS:
- ONLY NEEDS WARNING IF STATEMENTS ARE CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION.
- CUSTODY:
- A REASONABLE PERSON BELIEVES THEY AREN’T FREE TO LEAVE.
- OBJECTIVE STANDARD.
- INTERROGATION:
- A COP IS TRYING TO ILICIT CRIMINAL INFORMATION.
- WAIVER:
- CAN BE WAIVED.
- AFFORDED WARNINGS:
- MIRANDA
- CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
AS LONG AS IT WAS KNOWNGLY/VOLUNTEERED.
- SEARCH & SEIZURE
- RULE:
- FL CONSTITUTION EXPRESSLY GUARANTEES YOUR RIGHT AGAINST UNREASONABLE SEARCH & SEIZURE.
- WHO?
- GOV AGENT MUST DO THE SEARCH.
- OR ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A GOV AGENT.
- WHAT IS A SEARCH?
- REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY.
- NO EXPECTATION:
- RULE:
- SEARCH & SEIZURE
OUT IN THE OPEN.
PLAIN VIEW.
- STANDARD?
- PROBABLE CAUSE.
- STANDARD?
MORE LIKELY THAN NOT THAT A CRIMINAL ACTIVITY IS BEING CONDUCTED.
- WARRANT:
- IF ALL ELEMENTS ARE MET, GOV AGENT NEEDS WARRANT:
- A VALID SEARCH WARRANT:
- WARRANT:
MUST BE ISSUED BY NEUTRAL MAGISTRATE.
MUST SPECIFY THE SCOPE OF WARRANT.
COP CANNOT EXCEED SCOPE OF WARRANT.
- EXCEPTIONS:
EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES:
SUBJECT IS TRYING TO FLEE, OR
SUBJECT IS DESTROYING EVIDENCE.
STOP & FRISK:
CAN STOP/TALK IF REASONABLE SUSPICION.
CAN FRISK IF ADDITIONAL SUSPICION OF WEAPON.
SEARCH INCIDENT TO LAWFUL ARREST:
CAN SEARCH ANYWHERE ON YOUR PERSON OR WINGSPAN.
CONSENT:
WHO?
ANYONE WITH ACTUAL APPARENT AUTHORITY TO THE PREMISES.
- BONDS
- FL GOV IS ASKING FOR MONEY TO DO SOMETHING THEY DON’T HAVE ENOUGH FOR.
- REVENUE BOND:
- GOV MAKES CAPITAL PROJECT THAT GENERATES REVENUE.
- NO REFERENDUM REQUIRED.
- NO VOTE.
- EXAMPLE:
- TOLLS.
- GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND:
- GOV IS BUILDING A CAPITAL PROJECT.
- HOWEVER, IT DOES NOT GENERATE REVENUE BY ITSELF.
- IT IS BACKED BY THE FULL FAITH & CREDIT FROM THE STATE.
- BONDS
GOV IS PROMISING TO PAY BACK.
- EMINENT DOMAIN:
- TAKINGS CLAUSE:
- GOV CAN TAKE PRIVATE PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSE IF THEY PROVIDE FULL COMPENSATION/FAIR MARKET VALUE.
- INVERSE CONDEMNATION:
- REDUCES ECONOMIC VALUE OF MY LAND TO NOTHING.
- (BASICALLY WORTHLESS).
- TAKINGS CLAUSE:
- RIGHT TO WORK:
- FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT.
- STRICT SCRUTINY.
- DUE PROCESS OR EQUAL PROTECTION.
- THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION PROHIBITS AN EMPLOYER FROM DENYING OR ABRIDGING THE RIGHT TO WORK ON THE BASIS OF MEMBERSHIP OR NON-MEMBERSHIP IN A LABOR UNION.
- FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT.
- EMINENT DOMAIN:
MOREOVER, A UNION CANNOT NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT THAT WOULD REQUIRE WORKERS TO BECOME UNION MEMBERS OR PAY UNION DUES. WORKERS ARE GUARANTEED THE RIGHT, IF THEY CHOOSE, TO BARGAIN COLLECTIVELY THROUGH A LABOR ORGANIZATION.
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES HAVE NO RIGHT TO STRIKE.
- PRIVATE VS. PUBLIC NUISANCE:
- PRIVATE:
- DOES THIS UNREASONABLY INTERFERE WITH THE USE AND ENJOYMENT OF LAND?
- PUBLIC:
- IS THIS AFFECTING THE COMMUNITY AT LARGE?
- PRIVATE PLAINTIFF:
- PRIVATE:
- PRIVATE VS. PUBLIC NUISANCE:
MUST PROVE SPECIAL HARM/DAMAGES.