Motivation and Attitudes in the Workplace
Motivation and Attitudes and their Consequences in the Workplace
Acknowledgement of Country:
- Acknowledges the traditional custodians of the land, the Wallumattagal people of the Dharug nation.
- Pays respects to Elders and knowledge holders, past, present, and future.
Motivation Learning Outcomes
- Describe what motivation is.
- Explain the different types of theories of motivation.
- Identify the practice implications of those theories.
What is Motivation?
- (Vinacke, 1962) Those conditions responsible for…
- Direction of effort
- Intensity of effort
- Persistence
- "Motivation concerns conditions responsible for variations in intensity, quality, & direction of ongoing behavior" (Conte & Landy, 2019)
- Making connections: Motivation & Performance (Week2)
- Consistent relationships exist between personality characteristics & performance motivation
- Neuroticism negatively related to performance motivation
- Conscientiousness positively related to performance motivation
- Making connections: Motivation & Personality (Week 9)
Theoretical Approaches to Motivation
Motivational Metaphors
- Person as scientist theories
- Person as machine theories
Theoretical approaches to motivation
- Behavioural theories
- Content & Need-based Theories
- Process Theories
Behavioural Theories
- Behaviour more likely to occur when reinforced
- People are motivated to do things that have previously been rewarded, and to avoid things that were punished
- To motivate people to do something, reward them every time they do it (or offer a reward);
- to discourage, punish
- Example: Theory X management (McGregor, 1960)
Content & Need-Based Theories
- Behaviour is motivated by basic needs
- Situational factors affect motivation by their influence over which needs are met / unmet at any time
- Example theories
- Maslow’s hierarchy
- Herzberg’s two factors
- SDT (Self-determination theory)
- Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs (1943)
- People are motivated to meet all these needs but are motivated most by the lowest level of need that is unmet
- Not well supported by evidence
- Self-actualization
- Esteem
- Affiliation
- Safety/Security
- Physiological
Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory (1959)
- Hygiene factors
- Pay and benefits
- Safe environment
- Comfortable environment
- Job security
- Opportunities to interact with other people
- Motivator factors
- Opportunities for promotion
- Recognition
- Responsibility
- Opportunity to develop new skills
- Interesting work
- Achievement
- Demotivation Motivation
- Not the case that work characteristics simply range from good to bad
- Hygiene factors are needed at some level, but high levels don’t motivate
- “Motivators” needed for higher-level, intrinsic motivation
Person-as-Scientist: Process Theories
- Describe the processes by which needs are translated into behaviour
- Most focus more directly on the cognitive processes underlying motivation
- Examples
- Equity theory
- Expectancy theory
- Goal-setting theory
Equity Theory (Adams, 1965)
- People compare themselves to others and evaluate their own situation in relation to others’ situations
- Looks at inputs (e.g., effort, time, training & experience) & outcomes (e.g., pay, opportunities, recognition)
- Underpayment inequity
- Investing more inputs and/or getting fewer outcomes
- Equity theory is good at explaining people’s motivations and actions here
- Overpayment inequity
- Investing less inputs and/or getting more outcomes
- Equity theory is poor at explaining people’s actions here – it is likely that altering our perceptions is preferable to acknowledging overpayment
- When facing inequity, a person can
- Change inputs
- Change outcomes
- Alter perceptions of self
- Alter perceptions of other
- Choose a different “other”
- Avoid / exit
Expectancy Theory (or VIE Theory) (Vroom, 1964)
Motivations are influenced by three important cognitive evaluations
- Expectancy – the likelihood that you can, through your actions (e.g., by working hard) achieve the desired level of performance
- Instrumentality – the likelihood that if you perform at that level, you will get a particular outcome
- Valence – the extent to which you value an outcome … or the activity or performance
Intrinsic Motivation: Action itself is rewarding…
Goal Setting Theory (Locke & Latham, 1984)
- Motivation arises from clear perceptions of purpose and objectives
- Goals assist most with direction, but also helps with intensity and persistence of effort
- Compared to vague statements like “do your best”, difficult-but-attainable goals have been shown to motivate better work performance is for specific
- More specific goals provide clearer direction for action is for measurable
- Measurable goals provide clearer indications of progress is for agreed-to
- A key requirement for motivation is that the employee accept the goal is for realistic
- Challenge is good, but unrealistically difficult goals undermine motivation is for time-limited
- Shorter time-limits enhance specificity and direct immediate action SMART goals
Summary
- Content theories distinguish between basic needs (e.g., pay, safety), intermediate needs (e.g., esteem), and higher-level needs (e.g., competence, freedom)
- Higher need-fulfillment linked to intrinsic motivation, but not all behaviour is about fulfilling such needs!
- Process theories focus on the ability of cognitive mechanisms (comparisons, expectancies & goals) to effect behaviour-related judgements
- But “cold” cognitive processes don’t drive all human behaviours!
Work Attitudes Learning Outcomes
- Describe what “attitude” means
- Describe four different work-related attitudes
- Identify a work behaviour associated with each attitude
What are Attitudes?
- Things we call “attitudes” can have up to three components
- Affect
- Moods / emotions
- e.g., feeling angry at your boss
- Cognition
- Judgments, beliefs/values
- e.g. thinking your pay is too low
- Behaviour
- Effort, compliance, voluntary acts
- e.g. applying for other jobs while at work
- Affect
- “Relatively stable feelings or beliefs directed toward specific persons, groups, ideas, or jobs”
- Types of work attitudes
- Job satisfaction
- Turnover intention
- Organisational commitment
- Engagement
- While most attitudes reflect a positive—negative dimension, there are important differences between different attitudes
Job Satisfaction
- What is Job Satisfaction?
- “a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one’s job or job experiences” (Locke, 1976)
- This definition highlights two elements of job satisfaction
- Affective
- Cognitive
Measuring Job Satisfaction
- Affective vs Cognitive
- How you feel vs appraisal and judgement
- Cognitive measures tend to be more specific about the source of satisfaction
- Specific vs Global
- Specifics can include
- Job content
- Work environment
- Pay, benefits, opportunities
- Policies and processes
- Supervision and leadership
- Specifics can include
Effects of Job Satisfaction on Behaviour
- General compliance (e.g. attendance), tenure
- Willingness to perform required tasks
- related to job performance
- Willingness to perform OCBs (Moorman, 1993), and to help the organisation (Brief, 1998)
- related to organisational performance
Satisfaction – Performance Association
- Many different views, including…
- Job Satisfaction à Job Performance (attitude theories)
- Job Performance à Job Satisfaction (via rewards; motivation theories)
- Both associated with 3rd variable (e.g., self-esteem)
- No relation
- It depends… (e.g., on reward contingency)
Turnover Intention
- How likely someone is to leave the job
Turnover Intention
- Associated with, but different from turnover
- Turnover can only be measured at group or organisation levels
- Associated with other attitudes (e.g., satisfaction), but also influenced by other factors, such as:
- Interest in study or other careers
- Partner’s job opportunities
- Family responsibilities
Organisational Commitment
How strongly are employees connected to their organisations, and in what ways?
Three levels (Allen & Myer, 1990)
- Affective commitment
- feel good about being part of the organisation
- Normative commitment
- feel a sense of loyalty to the organisation
- Continuance commitment
- feel unable to leave
- Affective commitment
Continuance commitment may be better explained using two factors (Hartman & Bambacas, 2000)
- Sacrifices
- Leaving the organisation unfeasible because it would involve too high a personal cost
- Alternatives
- Leaving the organisation unfeasible because there are too few employment alternatives
- Sacrifices
Research shows that “positive” organisational policies (e.g., training, performance feedback, goal setting, valued benefits):
- are positively associated with affective and normative commitment
- are (weakly) negatively associated with continuance commitment
Employees high in any form of commitment are more likely to stay with the organisation
Employees high in affective and normative commitment are
- Much more likely to have positive attitudes to the organisation
- Slightly more likely to perform well in the organisation
Engagement
- The extent to which employees…
- feel positive and energetic while at work
- get a sense of meaning and value from their jobs
- feel good about their organisation
- are motivated to act in ways that help the organisation
- Overlaps with job satisfaction, organisational commitment and intrinsic motivation
- But more active than “satisfaction”, with stronger links to behaviour
Motivation and Attitudes: What’s the Difference?
- “Motivation” means all factors driving behaviour
- attitudes refer to thoughts/feelings which may or may not influence behaviour
- Attitude constructs tend to be differentiated by specific conditions and characteristics
- e.g., Organisational commitment
- Attitudes can have motivational aspects
- e.g., Engagement
Values and Attitudes: What’s the Difference?
- Values are about preferences and priorities
- Values can affect attitudes when an employee’s personal values are not consistent with the values of the organisation
- Person-Environment Fit theories
Types of Person-Environment Fit
- Supplementary
- A match between the characteristics of an individual employee with the characteristics of the team or organisation
- Attraction-Selection-Attrition Model
- A match between the characteristics of an individual employee with the characteristics of the team or organisation
- Complementary
- The extent to which an individual employee’s otherwise-unmet needs are fulfilled by the team or organisation (or vice versa)
- Theory of Work Adjustment
- The extent to which an individual employee’s otherwise-unmet needs are fulfilled by the team or organisation (or vice versa)
- Attraction-Selection-Attrition
- Perceiving fit involves employees forming “an implicit estimate of the congruence of their own personal characteristics and the attributes of… work organizations” (Schneider et al., 1995)
- Can include values, goals and norms (Cable & Edwards, 1984; Muchinsky & Monahan, 1987)
- Supplementary fit
- This model suggests that people are attracted to, selected into, and choose to stay or leave based on supplementary fit.
- Perceiving fit involves employees forming “an implicit estimate of the congruence of their own personal characteristics and the attributes of… work organizations” (Schneider et al., 1995)
- The Minnesota Theory of Work Adjustment
- Complementary Fit (Dawis & Lofquist, 1984)
Summary
- Attitudes involve affective and cognitive responses to work, and can influence work behaviour
- A wide range of attitudes can be identified and differentiated (more than just “good” and “bad”)
- Different attitudes influence different behaviours
- Theories such as ASA and TWA have been used to predict how supplementary and complementary forms of person-environment fit influence attitudes, performance and turnover
Discretionary Work Behaviour
- Learning Outcomes
- Describe four categories of work behaviour (other than completing required job tasks)
- Explain the importance of each type of work behaviour for organisational performance
What is Discretionary Work Behaviour?
- Actions undertaken voluntarily
- Can include actions that are not formally required, but are informally expected (e.g., attending meetings)
- Compared to in-role behaviour (doing your required job tasks), discretionary behaviours are more strongly influenced by attitudes, values, and personality
Other Terms
- Voluntary work behaviour
- Extra-role behaviour
- Contextual performance
- Different from
- In-role behaviour / task performance
| In-role Behaviour | Discretionary Behaviour |
|---|---|
| Requirements vary from job to job | Common to most jobs |
| Individual differences tied to abilities & knowledge | Individual differences tied to personality |
| Activities part of formal job description | Activities not part of formal job description |
| Supports job goals | Supports organisational environment |
Why Look at Discretionary Behaviour?
- Job performance was traditionally treated as a single, homogeneous construct
- Hard to predict job performance
- Research has demonstrated that by increasing specificity in job performance (or job behaviour) constructs, predictions are possible
Some types of discretionary behaviour - Organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB)
- Discretionary behaviours beyond formal job requirements that contribute to the goals of the organisation
- Counterproductive work behaviour (CWB)
- Discretionary behaviours beyond formal job requirements that harm the wellbeing of the organisation
OCB: Different Factor Structures
- Two-factor model
- Altruism
- Generalised compliance
- Three-factor model
- Personal support
- Organisational support
- Conscientious initiative
- Five-factor model
- Altruism
- Civic virtue
- Courtesy
- Conscientiousness
- Sportspersonship
- Five factors of OCB (Organ, 1988)
- Altruism: Helpful behaviours directed toward others within the organisation
- Example – helping out a colleague who has a tight deadline
- Civic virtue: Acts showing involvement in and concern for organisational life
- Examples – attending regular meetings, office functions
- Courtesy: Behaviours that prevent interpersonal conflict & maintain harmony
- Example – notifying a colleague about a change that will affect them
- Conscientiousness: Actions going beyond minimum requirements to further org. goals
- Example – staying back after work to ensure work is of high quality
- Sportspersonship: Acts that show tolerance of undesirable conditions
- Example – NOT complaining about a short-term inconvenience
- Altruism: Helpful behaviours directed toward others within the organisation
OCB: Causes and Effects
- OCBs influenced by
- Personality
- Conscientiousness
- Agreeableness
- Situation
- Autonomy
- Politics / trust
- Personality
- OCBs influence…
- Career success (Van Scotter et al, 2000)
- Performance ratings (Motowidlo & Van Scotter, 1994)
- independently of task performance
Complex issues with OCBs
- To what extent does OCB research reflect truly voluntary behaviour?
- Are OCBs always beneficial for the employee?
- Are OCBs always beneficial for organisations?
- Do all OCBs have pro-social motivations?
Counterproductive Work Behaviour: Examples
- Absenteeism
- Non-attendance without pre-arranged leave
- Withdrawal (“presenteeism”)
- Attending work, but doing minimum contribution
- Sabotage
- Acts that damage, disrupt, or subvert the organisation’s operations
- E.g., quiet quitting
- Acts that damage, disrupt, or subvert the organisation’s operations
CWB: Different Factor Structures
- Two-factor model
- CWB-I (Individual)
- CWB-O (Organisational)
- Three-factor model
- CWB-S (self-gain)
- CWB-O (organisation-gain)
- CWB-D (destructive)
- Three-factor model
- Interpersonal deviance
- Production deviance
- Property deviance
Effects of CWBs
- Harm to individuals
- Harm to groups
- Harm to organisation
- Harm to self
Other Types of Discretionary Behaviour
- Adaptive behaviour
- Displays of flexibility and adaptation to changing circumstances; the extent to which an individual adapts to changes in a work system or work role
- Proactive behaviour
- Displays of initiative; the extent to which the individual initiates action to anticipate or achieve change in a work system or work roles
Why Adaptive Behaviour?
- Beneficial due to changing nature of work
- Changing technologies alter work tasks
- Mergers, downsizing, & corporate restructuring
- Globalisation & working in different cultures
Forms of Adaptive Behaviour
- Handle emergencies
- Quick diagnosis and response in emergencies
- Handle work stress
- Remain calm, and calm others, despite stressors
- Solve problems creatively
- Generate novel approaches for novel problems
- Deal with uncertainty
- Decide despite limited information, then adjust
- Learn work tasks etc
- Continue to seek new knowledge and skills
- Show interpersonal adaptability
- Be open-minded, consider others, handle criticism
- Show cultural adaptability
- Respect and seek to understand other cultures
- Show physical adaptability
- Adjust to challenging physical environments
Proactivity at Work
- Proactivity “anticipatory action that employees take to impact themselves and/or their environments” (Grant & Ashford, 2008)
- Examples
- Creativity & problem-solving
- Entrepreneurship
- Networking
- Job crafting
Benefits of Proactivity
- Product innovations
- Process innovations
- Identification of future problems / opportunities
- Entrepreneurialism
- Citizenship
- Task performance
- Academic achievement
- Job search success
- Business success (e.g., microbusinesses)
- Career success
- Job and career satisfaction
Forms of Proactive Behaviour (Parker et al., 2010)
- Focus: fit between self & the internal work environment
- Examples: job crafting, feedback-seeking Proactive P-E fit behaviour
- Focus: internal organisational environment
- Examples: taking charge, problem-solving Proactive work behavior
- Focus: organisation’s strategy & fit with the environment
- Examples: issue selling, strategic scanning Proactive strategic behavior
Proactivity: Is it Always Positive?
- Often defined as a positive organisational phenomenon
- Nearly always measured in terms of positive actions and outcomes
- Proactive CWB anticipating, planning and taking action towards a proactive goal in which future harm to the organization, or its stakeholders, is intended or expected
- Different from well-intended but misjudged proactivity (see Chan, 2006), where harm is unexpected
Proactive CWB
- Some examples
- Premeditated theft
- Impression management (self-promotion, negative projection)
- Misrepresentation of products
- Bullying/incivility and social undermining
- Sabotage
Summary
- Much more to job performance and work behaviour than proficient completion of required job duties
- Likely to become even more so in the future
- Different behaviours influenced by different features
- Situational factors (e.g. autonomy, politics, norms)
- Personality (e.g. agreeableness, conscientiousness)
- Attitudes (e.g. satisfaction) and moods (e.g. enthusiasm)
- Values (e.g. altruism)