Motivation and Attitudes in the Workplace

Motivation and Attitudes and their Consequences in the Workplace

Acknowledgement of Country:

  • Acknowledges the traditional custodians of the land, the Wallumattagal people of the Dharug nation.
  • Pays respects to Elders and knowledge holders, past, present, and future.

Motivation Learning Outcomes

  • Describe what motivation is.
  • Explain the different types of theories of motivation.
  • Identify the practice implications of those theories.

What is Motivation?

  • (Vinacke, 1962) Those conditions responsible for…
    • Direction of effort
    • Intensity of effort
    • Persistence
  • "Motivation concerns conditions responsible for variations in intensity, quality, & direction of ongoing behavior" (Conte & Landy, 2019)
  • Making connections: Motivation & Performance (Week2)
    • (Motivation×Ability)SituationalConstraints=PERFORMANCE(Motivation \times Ability) - Situational Constraints = PERFORMANCE
  • Consistent relationships exist between personality characteristics & performance motivation
    • Neuroticism negatively related to performance motivation
    • Conscientiousness positively related to performance motivation
  • Making connections: Motivation & Personality (Week 9)

Theoretical Approaches to Motivation

Motivational Metaphors

  • Person as scientist theories
  • Person as machine theories

Theoretical approaches to motivation

  • Behavioural theories
  • Content & Need-based Theories
  • Process Theories
Behavioural Theories
  • Behaviour more likely to occur when reinforced
    • People are motivated to do things that have previously been rewarded, and to avoid things that were punished
    • To motivate people to do something, reward them every time they do it (or offer a reward);
    • to discourage, punish
    • Example: Theory X management (McGregor, 1960)
Content & Need-Based Theories
  • Behaviour is motivated by basic needs
  • Situational factors affect motivation by their influence over which needs are met / unmet at any time
  • Example theories
    • Maslow’s hierarchy
    • Herzberg’s two factors
    • SDT (Self-determination theory)
  • Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs (1943)
    • People are motivated to meet all these needs but are motivated most by the lowest level of need that is unmet
    • Not well supported by evidence
    • Self-actualization
    • Esteem
    • Affiliation
    • Safety/Security
    • Physiological
Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory (1959)
  • Hygiene factors
    • Pay and benefits
    • Safe environment
    • Comfortable environment
    • Job security
    • Opportunities to interact with other people
  • Motivator factors
    • Opportunities for promotion
    • Recognition
    • Responsibility
    • Opportunity to develop new skills
    • Interesting work
    • Achievement
  • Demotivation Motivation
    • Not the case that work characteristics simply range from good to bad
    • Hygiene factors are needed at some level, but high levels don’t motivate
    • “Motivators” needed for higher-level, intrinsic motivation
Person-as-Scientist: Process Theories
  • Describe the processes by which needs are translated into behaviour
  • Most focus more directly on the cognitive processes underlying motivation
  • Examples
    • Equity theory
    • Expectancy theory
    • Goal-setting theory
Equity Theory (Adams, 1965)
  • People compare themselves to others and evaluate their own situation in relation to others’ situations
  • Looks at inputs (e.g., effort, time, training & experience) & outcomes (e.g., pay, opportunities, recognition)
  • Underpayment inequity
    • Investing more inputs and/or getting fewer outcomes
    • Equity theory is good at explaining people’s motivations and actions here
  • Overpayment inequity
    • Investing less inputs and/or getting more outcomes
    • Equity theory is poor at explaining people’s actions here – it is likely that altering our perceptions is preferable to acknowledging overpayment
  • When facing inequity, a person can
    • Change inputs
    • Change outcomes
    • Alter perceptions of self
    • Alter perceptions of other
    • Choose a different “other”
    • Avoid / exit
Expectancy Theory (or VIE Theory) (Vroom, 1964)
  • Motivations are influenced by three important cognitive evaluations

    • Expectancy – the likelihood that you can, through your actions (e.g., by working hard) achieve the desired level of performance
    • Instrumentality – the likelihood that if you perform at that level, you will get a particular outcome
    • Valence – the extent to which you value an outcome … or the activity or performance
  • Intrinsic Motivation: Action itself is rewarding…

Goal Setting Theory (Locke & Latham, 1984)
  • Motivation arises from clear perceptions of purpose and objectives
  • Goals assist most with direction, but also helps with intensity and persistence of effort
  • Compared to vague statements like “do your best”, difficult-but-attainable goals have been shown to motivate better work performance is for specific
  • More specific goals provide clearer direction for action is for measurable
  • Measurable goals provide clearer indications of progress is for agreed-to
  • A key requirement for motivation is that the employee accept the goal is for realistic
  • Challenge is good, but unrealistically difficult goals undermine motivation is for time-limited
  • Shorter time-limits enhance specificity and direct immediate action SMART goals
Summary
  • Content theories distinguish between basic needs (e.g., pay, safety), intermediate needs (e.g., esteem), and higher-level needs (e.g., competence, freedom)
    • Higher need-fulfillment linked to intrinsic motivation, but not all behaviour is about fulfilling such needs!
  • Process theories focus on the ability of cognitive mechanisms (comparisons, expectancies & goals) to effect behaviour-related judgements
    • But “cold” cognitive processes don’t drive all human behaviours!

Work Attitudes Learning Outcomes

  • Describe what “attitude” means
  • Describe four different work-related attitudes
  • Identify a work behaviour associated with each attitude
What are Attitudes?
  • Things we call “attitudes” can have up to three components
    • Affect
      • Moods / emotions
      • e.g., feeling angry at your boss
    • Cognition
      • Judgments, beliefs/values
      • e.g. thinking your pay is too low
    • Behaviour
      • Effort, compliance, voluntary acts
      • e.g. applying for other jobs while at work
  • “Relatively stable feelings or beliefs directed toward specific persons, groups, ideas, or jobs”
  • Types of work attitudes
    • Job satisfaction
    • Turnover intention
    • Organisational commitment
    • Engagement
  • While most attitudes reflect a positive—negative dimension, there are important differences between different attitudes
Job Satisfaction
  • What is Job Satisfaction?
    • “a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one’s job or job experiences” (Locke, 1976)
    • This definition highlights two elements of job satisfaction
      • Affective
      • Cognitive
Measuring Job Satisfaction
  • Affective vs Cognitive
    • How you feel vs appraisal and judgement
    • Cognitive measures tend to be more specific about the source of satisfaction
  • Specific vs Global
    • Specifics can include
      • Job content
      • Work environment
      • Pay, benefits, opportunities
      • Policies and processes
      • Supervision and leadership
Effects of Job Satisfaction on Behaviour
  • General compliance (e.g. attendance), tenure
  • Willingness to perform required tasks
    • related to job performance
  • Willingness to perform OCBs (Moorman, 1993), and to help the organisation (Brief, 1998)
    • related to organisational performance
Satisfaction – Performance Association
  • Many different views, including…
    • Job Satisfaction à Job Performance (attitude theories)
    • Job Performance à Job Satisfaction (via rewards; motivation theories)
    • Both associated with 3rd variable (e.g., self-esteem)
    • No relation
    • It depends… (e.g., on reward contingency)
Turnover Intention
  • How likely someone is to leave the job
Turnover Intention
  • Associated with, but different from turnover
    • Turnover can only be measured at group or organisation levels
  • Associated with other attitudes (e.g., satisfaction), but also influenced by other factors, such as:
    • Interest in study or other careers
    • Partner’s job opportunities
    • Family responsibilities
Organisational Commitment
  • How strongly are employees connected to their organisations, and in what ways?

  • Three levels (Allen & Myer, 1990)

    • Affective commitment
      • feel good about being part of the organisation
    • Normative commitment
      • feel a sense of loyalty to the organisation
    • Continuance commitment
      • feel unable to leave
  • Continuance commitment may be better explained using two factors (Hartman & Bambacas, 2000)

    • Sacrifices
      • Leaving the organisation unfeasible because it would involve too high a personal cost
    • Alternatives
      • Leaving the organisation unfeasible because there are too few employment alternatives
  • Research shows that “positive” organisational policies (e.g., training, performance feedback, goal setting, valued benefits):

    • are positively associated with affective and normative commitment
    • are (weakly) negatively associated with continuance commitment
  • Employees high in any form of commitment are more likely to stay with the organisation

  • Employees high in affective and normative commitment are

    • Much more likely to have positive attitudes to the organisation
    • Slightly more likely to perform well in the organisation
Engagement
  • The extent to which employees…
    • feel positive and energetic while at work
    • get a sense of meaning and value from their jobs
    • feel good about their organisation
    • are motivated to act in ways that help the organisation
  • Overlaps with job satisfaction, organisational commitment and intrinsic motivation
    • But more active than “satisfaction”, with stronger links to behaviour
Motivation and Attitudes: What’s the Difference?
  • “Motivation” means all factors driving behaviour
    • attitudes refer to thoughts/feelings which may or may not influence behaviour
  • Attitude constructs tend to be differentiated by specific conditions and characteristics
    • e.g., Organisational commitment
  • Attitudes can have motivational aspects
    • e.g., Engagement
Values and Attitudes: What’s the Difference?
  • Values are about preferences and priorities
  • Values can affect attitudes when an employee’s personal values are not consistent with the values of the organisation
    • Person-Environment Fit theories
Types of Person-Environment Fit
  • Supplementary
    • A match between the characteristics of an individual employee with the characteristics of the team or organisation
      • Attraction-Selection-Attrition Model
  • Complementary
    • The extent to which an individual employee’s otherwise-unmet needs are fulfilled by the team or organisation (or vice versa)
      • Theory of Work Adjustment
  • Attraction-Selection-Attrition
    • Perceiving fit involves employees forming “an implicit estimate of the congruence of their own personal characteristics and the attributes of… work organizations” (Schneider et al., 1995)
      • Can include values, goals and norms (Cable & Edwards, 1984; Muchinsky & Monahan, 1987)
      • Supplementary fit
    • This model suggests that people are attracted to, selected into, and choose to stay or leave based on supplementary fit.
  • The Minnesota Theory of Work Adjustment
    • Complementary Fit (Dawis & Lofquist, 1984)
Summary
  • Attitudes involve affective and cognitive responses to work, and can influence work behaviour
    • A wide range of attitudes can be identified and differentiated (more than just “good” and “bad”)
    • Different attitudes influence different behaviours
  • Theories such as ASA and TWA have been used to predict how supplementary and complementary forms of person-environment fit influence attitudes, performance and turnover

Discretionary Work Behaviour

  • Learning Outcomes
    • Describe four categories of work behaviour (other than completing required job tasks)
    • Explain the importance of each type of work behaviour for organisational performance
What is Discretionary Work Behaviour?
  • Actions undertaken voluntarily
    • Can include actions that are not formally required, but are informally expected (e.g., attending meetings)
  • Compared to in-role behaviour (doing your required job tasks), discretionary behaviours are more strongly influenced by attitudes, values, and personality
Other Terms
  • Voluntary work behaviour
  • Extra-role behaviour
  • Contextual performance
  • Different from
    • In-role behaviour / task performance
In-role BehaviourDiscretionary Behaviour
Requirements vary from job to jobCommon to most jobs
Individual differences tied to abilities & knowledgeIndividual differences tied to personality
Activities part of formal job descriptionActivities not part of formal job description
Supports job goalsSupports organisational environment
Why Look at Discretionary Behaviour?
  • Job performance was traditionally treated as a single, homogeneous construct
    • Hard to predict job performance
  • Research has demonstrated that by increasing specificity in job performance (or job behaviour) constructs, predictions are possible
    Some types of discretionary behaviour
  • Organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB)
    • Discretionary behaviours beyond formal job requirements that contribute to the goals of the organisation
  • Counterproductive work behaviour (CWB)
    • Discretionary behaviours beyond formal job requirements that harm the wellbeing of the organisation
OCB: Different Factor Structures
  • Two-factor model
    • Altruism
    • Generalised compliance
  • Three-factor model
    • Personal support
    • Organisational support
    • Conscientious initiative
  • Five-factor model
    • Altruism
    • Civic virtue
    • Courtesy
    • Conscientiousness
    • Sportspersonship
  • Five factors of OCB (Organ, 1988)
    • Altruism: Helpful behaviours directed toward others within the organisation
      • Example – helping out a colleague who has a tight deadline
    • Civic virtue: Acts showing involvement in and concern for organisational life
      • Examples – attending regular meetings, office functions
    • Courtesy: Behaviours that prevent interpersonal conflict & maintain harmony
      • Example – notifying a colleague about a change that will affect them
    • Conscientiousness: Actions going beyond minimum requirements to further org. goals
      • Example – staying back after work to ensure work is of high quality
    • Sportspersonship: Acts that show tolerance of undesirable conditions
      • Example – NOT complaining about a short-term inconvenience
OCB: Causes and Effects
  • OCBs influenced by
    • Personality
      • Conscientiousness
      • Agreeableness
    • Situation
      • Autonomy
      • Politics / trust
  • OCBs influence…
    • Career success (Van Scotter et al, 2000)
    • Performance ratings (Motowidlo & Van Scotter, 1994)
    • independently of task performance
      Complex issues with OCBs
  • To what extent does OCB research reflect truly voluntary behaviour?
  • Are OCBs always beneficial for the employee?
  • Are OCBs always beneficial for organisations?
  • Do all OCBs have pro-social motivations?
Counterproductive Work Behaviour: Examples
  • Absenteeism
    • Non-attendance without pre-arranged leave
  • Withdrawal (“presenteeism”)
    • Attending work, but doing minimum contribution
  • Sabotage
    • Acts that damage, disrupt, or subvert the organisation’s operations
      • E.g., quiet quitting
CWB: Different Factor Structures
  • Two-factor model
    • CWB-I (Individual)
    • CWB-O (Organisational)
  • Three-factor model
    • CWB-S (self-gain)
    • CWB-O (organisation-gain)
    • CWB-D (destructive)
  • Three-factor model
    • Interpersonal deviance
    • Production deviance
    • Property deviance
# CWB Three Factor Model (Sackett & DeVore, 2001)

Effects of CWBs

  • Harm to individuals
  • Harm to groups
  • Harm to organisation
  • Harm to self
Other Types of Discretionary Behaviour
  • Adaptive behaviour
    • Displays of flexibility and adaptation to changing circumstances; the extent to which an individual adapts to changes in a work system or work role
  • Proactive behaviour
    • Displays of initiative; the extent to which the individual initiates action to anticipate or achieve change in a work system or work roles
Why Adaptive Behaviour?
  • Beneficial due to changing nature of work
    • Changing technologies alter work tasks
    • Mergers, downsizing, & corporate restructuring
    • Globalisation & working in different cultures
Forms of Adaptive Behaviour
  • Handle emergencies
    • Quick diagnosis and response in emergencies
  • Handle work stress
    • Remain calm, and calm others, despite stressors
  • Solve problems creatively
    • Generate novel approaches for novel problems
  • Deal with uncertainty
    • Decide despite limited information, then adjust
  • Learn work tasks etc
    • Continue to seek new knowledge and skills
  • Show interpersonal adaptability
    • Be open-minded, consider others, handle criticism
  • Show cultural adaptability
    • Respect and seek to understand other cultures
  • Show physical adaptability
    • Adjust to challenging physical environments
Proactivity at Work
  • Proactivity “anticipatory action that employees take to impact themselves and/or their environments” (Grant & Ashford, 2008)
  • Examples
    • Creativity & problem-solving
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Networking
    • Job crafting
Benefits of Proactivity
For Organizations
  • Product innovations
  • Process innovations
  • Identification of future problems / opportunities
  • Entrepreneurialism
  • Citizenship
  • Task performance
For Individuals
  • Academic achievement
  • Job search success
  • Business success (e.g., microbusinesses)
  • Career success
  • Job and career satisfaction
Forms of Proactive Behaviour (Parker et al., 2010)
  • Focus: fit between self & the internal work environment
    • Examples: job crafting, feedback-seeking Proactive P-E fit behaviour
  • Focus: internal organisational environment
    • Examples: taking charge, problem-solving Proactive work behavior
  • Focus: organisation’s strategy & fit with the environment
    • Examples: issue selling, strategic scanning Proactive strategic behavior
Proactivity: Is it Always Positive?
  • Often defined as a positive organisational phenomenon
  • Nearly always measured in terms of positive actions and outcomes
  • Proactive CWB anticipating, planning and taking action towards a proactive goal in which future harm to the organization, or its stakeholders, is intended or expected
    • Different from well-intended but misjudged proactivity (see Chan, 2006), where harm is unexpected
Proactive CWB
  • Some examples
    • Premeditated theft
    • Impression management (self-promotion, negative projection)
    • Misrepresentation of products
    • Bullying/incivility and social undermining
    • Sabotage
Summary
  • Much more to job performance and work behaviour than proficient completion of required job duties
    • Likely to become even more so in the future
  • Different behaviours influenced by different features
    • Situational factors (e.g. autonomy, politics, norms)
    • Personality (e.g. agreeableness, conscientiousness)
    • Attitudes (e.g. satisfaction) and moods (e.g. enthusiasm)
    • Values (e.g. altruism)