3.8 - The Constitutional Convention and Debates over Ratification
Theme: Politics and Power
Learning Objective 3.1
Explain the differing ideological positions on the structure and function of the federal government.
Key Concept: KC-3.2.II.C.i
Delegates from the states participated in the Constitutional Convention and, through negotiation, collaboration, and compromise, proposed a constitution.
Constitutional Convention Overview
The beginning of the Constitutional Convention traces back to 1786 during the Annapolis Convention.
Issue Identified: Not enough states sent delegates to address the Articles of Confederation (AOC) issues.
Next Meeting Planned: A follow-up convention was scheduled for 1787, with 12 of 13 states sending delegates to discuss reforms.
Main Goal: Create a Constitution primarily based on James Madison’s Virginia Plan.
Structure of the Government Proposed
The Constitution was designed to be based on Madison’s Virginia Plan incorporating three branches of government.
This new approach fundamentally rejected the existing governmental model in favor of drafting a new constitution.
The delegates convened at the Pennsylvania State House in Philadelphia, where meetings were held behind closed doors.
Key Issues Addressed: There were significant concerns regarding:
The size and power of the central government compared to the powers held by individual states.
The level of democracy to be permitted, emphasizing that only individuals who had a stake in the country and possessed a certain level of education should hold the most power in government.
The Connecticut Compromise
An agreement reached during the convention to settle representation issues through a bicameral legislature, composed of:
Senate: Equal representation for each state (2 senators from each state).
House of Representatives: Proportional representation based on state population.
Creation of the Electoral College
Purpose: To maintain the importance of states in Presidential elections, ensuring states retained influence despite the constitutional shift.
Each state is allocated a number of electoral votes equivalent to its total number of Senators and Representatives in Congress.
Functionality: The national popular vote does not directly determine presidential elections through these electoral votes.
Key Concept: KC-3.2.II.D
The Constitutional Convention achieved compromises over issues relating to the representation of slave states in Congress and the federal government's regulation of slavery and the slave trade.
This included a provision for prohibiting the international slave trade after 1808.
Compromises on Slavery
Southern states sought protective measures, leading to the invention of the Three-Fifths Compromise:
Definition: A method established to determine the representation of enslaved people in congressional matters.
Context: Southern states wanted enslaved individuals counted fully for congressional representation while Northern states argued against this on ethical grounds (not counting individuals who did not have rights).
Outcome: Each enslaved individual was counted as three-fifths of a person for representation in the House of Representatives.
Further Compromises on Slavery
Fugitive Slave Clause: Article IV guaranteed the return of runaway slaves who crossed state lines.
Ensured that when a runaway entered a different state, they remained bonded, necessitating their return if caught.
Delay in Banning the International Slave Trade:
The clause mandated that discussions around the importation of enslaved people from abroad could not be held for 20 years.
Despite their dehumanizing nature, these compromises were critical for persuading southern states to accept the new constitution.
Key Concept: KC-3.2.II.E
The debates surrounding the ratification of the Constitution featured a conflict between Anti-Federalists, who opposed ratification, and Federalists, who supported it.
The Federalist principles were primarily articulated through the Federalist Papers, drafted mainly by Alexander Hamilton and James Madison.
Ratification Debates
Anti-Federalist Arguments:
Concerns that a strong central government would infringe upon state sovereignty and personal liberties.
Federalist Arguments:
Advocated for a robust central government to enhance the economy and national defense.
Asserted that a federal system with separate branches of government would safeguard against tyranny.
The Federalist Papers were widely distributed across states to gain public support for ratification.
Promises for Ratification
The Federalists assured the Constitution's ratification by pledging to include a Bill of Rights outlining individual rights and restricting the federal government's powers.
Bill of Rights
The Bill of Rights was crafted during the first session of Congress by James Madison.
Contents: Comprised of the first ten amendments to the Constitution.
Ratification Requirements: Only nine out of thirteen states were needed to achieve ratification.
Timeline: Ratification was completed in June 1788; Rhode Island was the last to ratify in May 1790.
Conclusion
The final draft of the Constitution emerged from various compromises, notably granting protections regarding slavery to southern states.
The resulting ideological divide led to the emergence of Federalists and Anti-Federalists during the ratification battle.
Ratification was ultimately secured with the promise of a Bill of Rights, ensuring individual liberties were upheld.