ICD/ICF and Models
Discussion of Mental and Social Models
Context of Scenario:
Individual desires to engage in a discussion while visiting historic buildings.
Objective: Explore the mental and social models through practical scenarios.
Activity Instruction:
Participants instructed to find a partner outside of a designated four to five block radius.
First Scenario - Job Application:
Context: A local individual in Greenville applies for a job and has intellectual disabilities.
Possible Job Role: Task-based roles such as stocking shelves that require minimal problem-solving.
Discussion Points:
Explore perceived abilities and limitations from two perspectives:
Medical Model: Assesses individual as having intellectual disabilities, may suggest the inability to work in certain jobs.
Social Model: Acknowledges the individual's potential strengths and focuses on finding a suitable job based on those strengths.
Contrasting Models:
Medical Model: Limits prospects based on perceived disability; potential employer views it as a hindrance.
Social Model: Encourages hiring based on strengths, advocates for fairness and potential advantages of hiring individuals with intellectual disabilities.
Examples of Positive Attributes:
Many people with intellectual disabilities may be characterized as happy and bring positive energy to the workplace.
Potentially suitable for repetitive job roles.
Discussion Outcome:
Shifting focus from limitations to abilities and strengths helps in considering employment opportunities.
Second Scenario - Quality of Life vs. Life-Saving Care
Context:
A 20-year-old woman with cerebral palsy (CP), high support needs, admitted to the hospital with pneumonia.
Critical Question: Should we provide life-saving care or consider quality of life?
Medical Model Perspective:
Focused primarily on treating the individual based on medical assessments.
Assumes lack of quality of life due to severe illness and disabilities which may lead to recommendations to forgo life-saving treatment in favor of palliative care.
Social Model Perspective:
Views the individual's life as valuable and meaningful, irrespective of her disabilities.
Emphasizes the importance of quality of life, suggesting the need for continued supportive care as an ethical consideration, as well as leveraging family support (e.g., communication through the mother).
Raises questions about the responsibilities of healthcare professionals in supporting both the patient and family in decision-making.
Outcome of Discussion:
Potential for different interpretations of quality of life can lead to different care decisions and approaches between medical and social models.
Discussion of Disablement Models
Definition:
Disablement models serve as frameworks for clinical practice and research to integrate various aspects of patient care including evidence-based medicine, personal values, clinical expertise, and research evidence.
Health professions utilize a variety of disablement models to guide decisions.
Key Models:
Biomedical Model: Focuses on biological aspects of disease.
Medical Model: Centers on diagnosis and treatment primarily through medical interventions.
Social Model: Looks at the societal implications of disability and highlights support to increase individual capabilities.
ICD (International Classification of Diseases):
Framework for reporting diseases and health conditions.
Useful for coding and billing within healthcare systems, impacting healthcare databases and population health trends.
Example ICD Codes: For diabetes, the corresponding codes are categorized as follows:
- Type 1 diabetes,
- Type 2 diabetes,
- Type 1 diabetes with kidney complications.
ICF (International Classification of Function):
Addresses health and disability, considering body functions, activities, and participation on individual and population levels.
Helps healthcare professionals understand the complete impact of medical conditions on patients' lives.
ICF Model Breakdown
Components of the ICF Model:
Health Condition: Identifies the medical diagnosis (e.g., fractured kidney).
Body Functions and Structures: Analyzes anatomy and physiological aspects affected by health conditions, such as wrist mobility.
Activity Limitations: Describes specific tasks the individual struggles to perform.
Participation: Refers to engagement in society, activities, or roles affected by limitations and impairments.
Personal Factors: Details individual’s background, including age, gender, socio-economic status, and personal history.
Environmental Factors: Discusses external influences on the individual’s performance, such as family support, accessibility, and living conditions.
Example Case Study Breakdown
Example Presentation - Patient with Fractured Distal Radius:
Diagnosis: Fracture of the distal radius.
Personal Factors: 14-year-old male, living in a single-parent household; potential challenges with healthcare access and follow-up treatment.
Body Functions and Limitations:
Limited wrist movement affects tasks such as holding a pencil or playing basketball.
What activities he can and cannot do based on functional capacity.
Environmental Factors:
Living arrangements and socio-economic background play critical roles in healthcare access and support needs.
Reflection on the Case Study:
The need to adapt healthcare approaches based on individual patient contexts and the influence of broader socio-economic factors on health outcomes.