Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) data requirements: Need observed and modeled flow data.
Using SWAT to describe the impact of exploitation: Calibrate the SWAT model with local data (land use, soil, weather) and simulate the hydrological changes due to exploitation.
Question 4
SWAT model input vs. Processes:
Input: Rectangular boxes representing data like precipitation, temperature, land use etc.
Processes: Boxes that represent the calculations of various components of the water cycle.
Type of distributed model (SWAT): Spatially semi-distributed model.
Question 5
Differences between natural and urban hydrological cycle:
Increased impervious surfaces.
Increased surface runoff.
Reduced infiltration.
Limitations and weaknesses of climate change modeling:
Uncertainties in future emission scenarios.
Model resolution limitations.
Difficulty in representing complex feedback mechanisms.
d) Precipitation pattern changes in Sweden. Increased precipitation and intensity.
Hydrological model validation: Compare model outputs with observed data using statistical measures.
Question 6
Calculations and graph: Requires calculation and plotting of flow changes based on provided unit hydrograph and rainfall event h.
b) The maximum flow change Q for the rainfall event h is calculated from the resulting graph.
c) The time it take for the flow change to return to zero can be read from the graph.
Log Pearson III vs. Normal Distribution (Gringorten): Log Pearson III is preferred because it can handle skewed data, which is common in hydrological variables.