Property I Outline

Property I Outline

I. Introduction

  1. Property

    • Definition: A tangible or intangible resource that belongs to someone or something.

    • Legal relationship: The legal relationship between people regarding resources.

    • Title: Ownership.

  2. Bundle of Rights

    • Definition: A person has certain rights to do things with his property that are protected by the government. Rights are limited, not absolute.

    • Possession:

      • Right to control something; dominion and control.

      • Right to possess property.

      • Can transfer the right to possession to someone while still retaining ownership.

    • Use: Right to use the property and anything created out of it; right to exploit.

    • Disposition: Right to buy and sell, lease, transfer property by will, destroy.

    • Exclusion: Right to exclusive possession of the property.

  3. Clear and Muddy Rules

    • Clear Rule: Easy to administer; so clear that it doesn’t require a court's intervention.

    • Muddy Rule: Can be interpreted in multiple ways; confusing rule needing court intervention, but is more flexible.

  4. Two Categories of Property

    • Real Property: Land and fixtures.

      • Examples: Buildings, fences, dams, etc.

      • Fixture: Immovable property; personal property that became permanently attached to the land (e.g. dishwasher).

    • Personal Property: Anything else.

      • Examples: Car, tables, books, clothes, computers, stocks, etc.

  5. Personal Property

    • Tangible: Physical nature; can be seen and touched.

    • Intangible: Assets that cannot be touched or seen but still have value.

  6. Possession

    • Definition: The controlling or holding of personal property, with or without a claim of ownership. Can be actual or constructive possession.

    • There are two elements:

      • Intent to possess: An intent to possess on the part of the possessor.

      • Actual control: His or her actual controlling of the property.

II. Acquisition of Property

A. Acquisition by Discovery
  1. Acquisition by Discovery

    • Definition: The sighting or finding of unknown or unchartered territory.

    • Res Nullius/Terra Nullius: A thing or territory belonging to no one.

  2. Rule of Discovery

    • Resolves rights between Civilized Nations.

    • First in Time: The first to discover wins.

      • The first civilized nation to discover undiscovered lands gets them.

  3. Rights between the discovering nation and the aboriginal population

    • Aboriginals have a right of occupancy that the nation can extinguish by:

      • Purchase: Most of the land bought by the English was through purchase because it was cheaper to buy than to fight.

      • Conquest: Taking land by force.

  4. Labor on Land

    • Adding labor to land makes it someone’s property.

    • Indians lived on the land but didn’t use it for labor.

  5. First in Time

    • Establishes a priority of rights based on the time of acquiring the rights in question.

    • The chronologically first possessor has the better title.

    • The first to acquire property has the greatest right to it.

B. Acquisition by Capture
  1. Rule of Capture

    • Definition: The captor wins if he kills, captures, or mortally wounds a wild animal.

    • The wild animal must be within the captor’s certain control (e.g., Pierson v. Post).

    • Investment in the hunt or pursuit of an animal is not enough.

  2. Rule of Sportsmen

    • Sportsmen must have the prey within their reach or have a reasonable prospect of taking the prey.

    • Note: Not an actual rule; a position taken by dissent in Pierson v. Post.

  3. John Locke’s Labor Theory

    • If a person has expended his labor to create something or reduce it to possession, it should belong to him or he should have some right to it.

    • Idea: We should award someone property if they have expended labor and energy into it.

    • Example: A guy who collected a pile of horse manure.

  4. Adding Labor and Materials to the Property of Another

    • Ownership depends on the value of the thing created.

    • Where only labor is added, the owner of the raw material is given title unless fairness dictates otherwise.

    • Where both labor and materials are added, ownership is placed in the person who owned the principal material.

    • If the laborer is a thief or not an innocent improver, he will never get title.

    • Non-innocent improver: Someone who knows the material doesn’t belong to him and does it anyway.

    • Law of Accession: When two people claim ownership of property, the one that made the most material contribution owns the property.

  5. Whaling Custom

    • Fast Fish/Loose Fish: Similar to the rule of capture.

      • Fast Fish: Have possession of the whale; claimant owned the whale, dead or alive, if it was fastened to the boat.

      • Loose Fish: Hurt the whale but don’t have possession; exclusive right to capture upon the whaler that first affixed the harpoon and remained in fresh pursuit.

    • Iron-in-the-Whale/Salvage Fee: Similar to the rule of sportsmen.

    • Ghen v. Rich: Custom of the industry prevailed.

    • Court applies custom when: not against public policy, few people, close to legal rule, acquiesced to and industry need, and little external cost.

  6. Rationae Soli (by reason of the soil)

    • A landowner has certain rights on account of ownership of the soil.

    • Establishes exclusive right to hunt wild game on a landowner’s property, subject only to government’s right to regulate.

    • Landowner benefits from his trees, soil, wild animals, etc.

    • Gives the landowner constructive possession, not ownership.

    • Trespassers cannot lawfully take possession of wild animals on another’s land.

  7. Interference with Trade

    • Keeble v. Hickeringill: A person cannot engage in malicious interference with trade.

      • Malicious intent: Doing it for a particular reason, ruining someone’s trade, etc.

      • Can interfere with someone’s trade but cannot be malicious.

      • Honest competition is allowed.

      • Hunter Harassment Statute: People are not allowed to interfere with hunters.

  8. Relativity of Title

    • A person’s claim to title depends on where they stand in the chain of title.

    • Chain of title traces the path of ownership.

    • Idea: A person can have a relatively better title or right to possession than another while simultaneously having a right inferior to yet another person.

  9. Animus Revertendi

    • Definition: “Habit of return”.

    • Used to help determine domestication of animals.

    • If an animal shows the tendency to return, the owner does not lose a property interest in the animal when it leaves the owner’s possession.

    • Does not give ownership; just indicates that a person doesn’t lose title.

  10. Escape

    • If a wild animal escapes, the owner loses possession and the wild animal is again subject to the rule of capture.

  11. Rule of Increase

    • Offspring of an owned animal belong to the owner of the mother, absent an agreement to the contrary.

  12. Water Rights

    • Surface Water

      • Definition: Water on the surface of the earth, with two types of jurisdictions.

      • Riparian Rights: Right to water based on the fact that the land adjoins the water.

      • Prior Appropriation: Rights based on seniority, not location.

        • Whoever started taking out the water first and putting it to a beneficial use has the highest rights.

        • Common in arid states; cuts off most recent seniority during droughts.

      • Some jurisdictions are hybrids of both (e.g., Texas).

    • Groundwater

      • Different rights:

      • Absolute Ownership: Rule of capture; first to pull out the water gets to use it.

      • Common Law Reasonable Use: If someone is on the tract above the aquifer and takes water for use on their land, they can use as much as they want.

      • Others include Restatement reasonable use, prior appropriation, and correlative rights.

  13. Externality

    • Definition: Something that someone doesn’t take into consideration when calculating their actions (can be positive or negative).

    • Example: Tragedy of the Commons - leads to the exploitation of natural resources.

C. Acquisition by Creation
  1. Quasi-Property

    • Definition: An owner may not hold property rights against the public but may maintain property rights against specific individuals (competitors) (e.g., INS v. AP).

  2. Common Law Invention Protection

    • Definition: The property embodied in an invention is only protected to the extent of the chattels (e.g., Cheney Brothers v. Doris Silk).

    • Ideas are not protected because there are IP statutes for this.

    • Generally, there is no protection against copying under Common Law; others may copy at will.

  3. Intellectual Property

    • Patents:

      • Protection of inventions.

      • Granted for processes or products that are novel, useful, and non-obvious.

      • Cannot be a naturally occurring substance or product.

      • Lasts 20 years from the date of the original application, then non-renewable.

    • Copyrights:

      • Protection of created works.

      • Protection of ideas in books, articles, music, artistic works, etc.

      • Lasts 70 years after the death of the creator.

    • Trademarks:

      • Protection of branding.

      • Includes words and symbols indicating the source of a product or service.

  4. Right of Publicity

    • Definition: A person has the exclusive right to appropriate their identity.

    • Exclusive right for someone to use their name, likeness, signature, and voice for commercial purposes; arose out of the right of privacy.

    • Allows celebrities to gain maximum benefits from their identities.

    • Name protection extends even after the person dies.

    • California law extends the rule to include anything that evokes a person’s personality.

  5. Conversion

    • Definition: Wrongful exercise of ownership rights of personal property of another.

  6. No Property Rights in Body Organs

    • Case: Moore v. Regents of University of California.

    • Decision: The court stated the plaintiff had no cause of action based on several arguments:

      • Plaintiff’s expectations: Don’t expect to have surgery and keep organs.

      • State laws: Prohibit people from keeping removed organs.

      • Defendant’s patent: Plaintiff did not create or come up with the patent.

      • Right of publicity: Covered under duty to disclose.

      • Character of genetic material: Everyone has these cells.

      • Privacy and dignity: Covered under duty to disclose.

      • Public policy: It would hinder research and make researchers liable.

      • Role of courts: Should be left to the Legislature.

    • There are property rights in blood, sperm, plasma, hair, and eggs.

  7. Property Isn’t Property Unless We Can Enforce Our Rights

    • Private ownership comes with a right to exclude.

    • Nominal damages fail to protect the plaintiff’s right to exclude trespassers.

D. Acquisition by Find
  1. Title of the Finder

    • Definition: The title of the finder is good against the whole world but the true owner.

    • True owner has the highest title to the property; then the finder comes next.

  2. Bailment

    • Definition: Delivery of goods or personal property to the rightful possession of another (the bailee) without loss of title by the true owner (the bailor), usually for a specific purpose.

    • Basically handing over property without losing title (two types):

      • Voluntary Bailment:

      • Requires:

        • Delivery with intent to control.

        • Acceptance.

        • Express or implied contract over disposition of the property.

      • Example: A student asks you to watch her laptop and you agree, or a student leaves their laptop and you watch it for him.

      • Involuntary Bailment:

      • Exists where personal property has been accidentally left by the true owner in the possession of another (e.g., mislaid property).

      • Courts will impose a bailment; it doesn’t have to be involuntarily or accidentally.

      • Example: A person is evicted from an apartment, and the landlord stores his stuff.

  3. Types of Bailments

    • 1. For sole benefit of bailor;

    • 2. For sole benefit of the bailee;

    • 3. For mutual benefit.

  4. Bailor’s Duty

    • To notify the bailee of known or discoverable defects.

  5. Bailee’s Standard of Care

    • Depends on the type of bailment:

      • Benefit of bailor: Must exercise slight care; liable for only gross negligence.

      • Benefit of bailee: Must exercise great care; liable for even slight negligence.

      • Mutual benefit: Must exercise ordinary care; liable for negligence.

  6. Liability of Bailee

    • The bailee has a duty to return the property in the same condition, minus wear and tear, as provided for in the contract.

    • Rebuttable presumption of negligence: The bailor must prove the existence of bailment and that the bailee failed to return the property in the condition as required.

    • If bailor makes that showing, burden shifts to bailee to show the failure was not a result of negligence.

    • If bailee makes that showing, the burden shifts back to the bailor to show that negligence occurred.

  7. Lost Property

    • Definition: Property that is involuntarily separated from its owner.

    • Example: A finder of lost property has the highest claim to all except the true owner, unless it was buried.

    • Example: Walking and money falls out of a pocket = lost.

    • Mislaid: Putting it down and not finding it = mislaid.

  8. Buried Property

    • The landowner has the highest claim to lost property that is buried based on constructive possession.

  9. Finder as Licensee/Employee

    • The landowner has a higher claim than a licensee or an employee with a duty to report or find (e.g., hotel maid).

  10. Abandoned Property

    • Definition: Property over which the original owner has relinquished all rights and claims, but title has not vested in another.

    • Intent is key: Did they intend to relinquish all rights?

    • Generally belongs to the finder unless:

      • The finder is a trespasser whose trespass is more than trivial (in which case property belongs to the landowner).

      • The finder is an agent of another (property belongs to the principal).

  11. Mislaid Property

    • Definition: Property that is voluntarily left by its owner, but which the owner cannot find now.

    • The owner intentionally/purposefully left it but can’t find it.

    • The landowner has the highest claim to mislaid property, subject to relativity of title.

      • The landowner is in the best position to get the property back to the true owner.

    • The finder acquires no rights in mislaid property but is entitled to possession of lost and abandoned property against everyone else except the true owner.

    • Difference between lost and mislaid property:

      • Lost: Involuntary; Mislaid: Voluntary.

  12. Treasure Trove

    • Definition: Money (gold, silver, coin, plate, bullion, sometimes paper) that has been hidden in the earth or some other private place for such a length of time that the owner is likely unknown or dead.

    • In England, it goes to the crown; in the US, jurisdictions vary (finder versus landowner) and some have statutorily rejected it in favor of distribution via lost/mislaid rules.

E. Acquisition by Gift
  1. Two Types of Gifts:

    • Inter Vivos: A gift between the living.

      • Made before death with the intent for immediate passage of title.

      • Three elements:

      • Intent: Donative intent on the part of the donor.

      • Delivery: Delivery to the donee.

      • Acceptance: Acceptance by the donee (presumed unless expressly rejected by the donee).

    • Causa Mortis: A gift conditioned on the death of the donor.

      • Gift is made in contemplation of death.

      • Five elements:

      • Donative intent that the gift will take effect upon death.

      • Delivery to the donee.

      • Acceptance by the donee (presumed).

      • Donor must have a disorder making death imminent or be in peril threatening death.

      • Donor must actually die from the specific disorder or peril (e.g., if B gives a gift because he is dying of cancer but gets hit by a car, the gift will be invalid).

      • Death needs to occur for the gift to be valid.

  2. Delivery

    • Delivery is required because it forces the owner to feel the wrench of delivery and realize the official loss of dominion and control.

    • If the gift is already in possession, the court will not require re-delivery.

    • Gifts are irrevocable; the donor cannot take them back.

    • If a person merely says he is going to do something, it is just a gratuitous promise; this is why we require delivery.

    • A gift causa mortis is higher than something in a will because a will can only transfer property in the estate; a gift causa mortis becomes valid when the owner dies.

  3. Types of Delivery

    • Manual: Must physically be delivered (if it can be handed over, it must be).

    • Constructive: Give an object that represents the gift (e.g., a key for a car).

    • Symbolic: Something that describes the gift.

III. Possessory Estates and Future Interests

A. History
  1. Subinfeudiation

    • Definition: Chain of command in which each lower person owes services to the person above him.

    • Example: William gave land to a King and then the command structure began (e.g., William > King > Tenant-in-Chief > Mesne Lords > Tenant in Demesne).

    • If one person failed to perform their services, the land returned to the tenant-in-chief.

    • If a lower lord died with a son under 21, the tenant-in-chief became his guardian.

  2. Seisin

    • Definition: Possession of real property under claim of a freehold estate.

    • Indicates ownership; landlord has seisin.

    • Livery of Seisin: Ceremony required to pass seisin.

  3. Statute Quia Emptores

    • Definition: If someone sold their land, they sold both the land and services; previously, they could only give the land without the services.

B. Terms
  1. Words of Purchase

    • Specifies who is receiving the property.

  2. Characteristics

    • Conveyable: Can be sold/given/taken away during life (also known as alienable).

    • Devisable: Transfer/dispose of property by will after death.

    • Inheritable: Death without a will results in heirs taking it.

  3. Holographic Will

    • A handwritten will, usually written on a deathbed, requiring no witness and probably not using proper language.

  4. Hypothecate

    • Definition: To pledge property as security for a debt.

C. Possessory Estates
  1. Basics

    • Estate: Duration; how long someone can own something.

      • Classifies interests and reference to when and how ownership ends.

      • Every estate, except Fee Simple Absolute (FSA), must be followed by a future interest.

      • Every conveyance must end up in someone’s hands as an FSA.

    • The party who holds the right to take actual possession of the property holds the possessory estate.

  2. Freehold Estates

    • Fee Simple Absolute (FSA):

      • Description: The longest duration; the best estate to have.

      • Owner is the only person who can cut it off.

    • Defeasible Fees:

      • Fee Simple Subject to Determinable (FSD): Limited; it will end automatically when a stated event happens (E.g., “So long as…”).

      • Future Interest: Possibility of Reverter (POR) - Created in grantor.

      • Fee Simple Subject to Condition Subsequent (FSSCS):

      • Doesn’t automatically terminate; may be cut short or divested at the transferor’s election when a stated condition happens (E.g., “But if…”).

      • Future Interest: Right of Entry (ROE) created in grantor.

      • Fee Simple Subject to Executory Limitation (FSSEL):

      • Estate created when a grantor transfers a defeasible fee simple and creates a future interest in a third party.

      • Language: “So long as,” etc.

    • Fee Tail (FT):

      • Series of life estates in a family bloodline.

      • Language to create FT: “To A and the heirs of his body.”

    • Life Estate (LE): Lasts for the duration of the grantee’s life, followed by a reversion or remainder.

  3. Fee Simple Absolute (FSA)

    • Definition: Longest duration; best estate to have.

    • Language to create FSA:

      • Early common law: “To A and his heirs.”

      • Modern law: “To A.”

    • FSA is the default estate; lasts indefinitely.

  4. Intestate

    • Intestate Succession:

      • Issue/Spouse: Descendants (children, grandchildren).

      • Ancestors: Parents.

      • Collateral Kin: Anyone in the bloodline.

      • Escheat: If there are no blood relatives, the State takes it.

    • Primogeniture: The eldest son inherits all of the land (not followed by any states except Rhode Island).

    • Co-Parsony: Daughters must share together if there are no other heirs.

  5. Defeasible Fee Simples

    • Any estate may be made to be defeasible (i.e., terminate) prior to its natural endpoint upon occurrence of a specified future event.

    • Three types: FSD, FSSCS, FSSEL.

    • Fee Simple Determinable (FSD): Ends automatically when a stated event happens.

      • Language: “So long as,” etc.

      • Future Interest: Possibility of Reverter (POR).

    • Fee Simple Subject to Condition Subsequent (FSSCS):

      • May be cut short when a stated condition occurs.

      • Language: ”But if,” ”provided that,” etc.

      • Future Interest: Right of Entry (ROE).

    • Fee Simple Subject to Executory Limitation (FSSEL):

      • Estate created with both a defeasible fee simple and a future interest in a third party (not the grantor).

      • Language: Same as FSD or FSSCS.

  6. Covenant

    • Definition: A promise made by a grantee that a specified act will or will not occur.

    • Breach results in injunction or damages, not forfeiture.

    • Example: C might have a covenant in his house, and if he breaches, it doesn’t mean he will lose his house.

D. Future Interests
  1. Types of Future Interests

    • Retained by Grantor (created in the grantor):

      • Reversion (Rv), Possibility of Reverter (POR), Right of Entry (ROE).

    • Created in Grantee:

      • Vested Remainder (VRm), Contingent Remainder (CRm), Executory Interest (EI).

  2. Reversions

    • Definition: The interest remaining in the grantor (or in the successor in interest of a testator) who transfers a vested estate of lesser quantum than that of the vested estate which he has.

  3. Remainders

    • Definition: A future interest created in the grantee that waits until the termination of the preceding estate.

    • Types:

      • Vested Remainders (VRm): Given to an ascertained person and not subject to a condition precedent.

      • Indefeasibly Vested Remainder (VRm): Vested and cannot be taken away.

      • Vested Remainder Subject to Divestment (VRmStoD): Vested but can be taken away.

      • Vested Remainder Subject to Open (VRmStoO): Partially divested by other people in the class.

      • Contingent Remainder (CRm): Given to an unascertained person and/or subject to a condition precedent.

      • Example: Alternative contingent remainders are incompatible with each other.

  4. Executory Interests

    • Definition: A future interest that can divest or cut short a preceding interest, held by a third party.

    • Two types: Shifting and springing.

  5. Rules Prior to 1536

    • No future interest could be created in favor of a transferee.

    • No freehold estate could be created to “spring up” in the future.

  6. Conditions

    • Condition Subsequent: A condition affecting a grantee’s right to retain possession after the grantee has taken possession.

    • Condition Precedent: A condition affecting a grantee’s right to take possession before taking possession; must be satisfied beforehand.

E. Marketability
  1. Rules Furthering Marketability

    • Doctrine of Destructibility of Contingent Remainders: Destructs contingent remainders not vested at natural or artificial termination of the preceding freehold estate.

    • Rule in Shelley’s Case: Creates a life estate in A and a remainder in A’s heirs in FSA or FT; this then becomes a remainder in A.

    • Doctrine of Worthier Title: If O conveys “To A for life, then to O’s heirs,” the remainder is void, leaving the reversion in O.

    • Rule Against Perpetuities (RAP): Ensures that no interest is good unless it must vest within a certain time limit.

  2. Doctrine of Destructibility of Contingent Remainders

    • Elements:

      • If a contingent remainder in land does not vest at or before the termination of the preceding freehold estate, it is destroyed.

      • Seisin moves onto the next vested estate.

      • Applies only to CRm’s and not others.

  3. Future Interests

    • Identifying and claiming FDPls are essential to stable ownership of land.

  4. Clarity and Simplicity

    • Important for preventing disputes over property rights.

IV. Co-Ownership

A. Concurrent Interests
  1. Basics

    • Three types of concurrent interests:

      • Tenancies in Common, Joint Tenancy, and Tenancy by the Entirety.

    • Co-ownership refers to situations where two or more persons have concurrent rights of present or future possession.

  2. Tenancy in Common

    • Elements:

      • Separate but undivided interest; interests are descendible, devisable, and conveyable; no survivorship rights; requires unity of possession.

    • Flexibility: Each tenant can conduct activities on-property as long as they agree.

  3. Joint Tenancy

    • Elements:

      • Separate but undivided interests; right of survivorship; must have four unities: Time, Title, Interest, Possession.

    • Implications of death & survivorship; rights terminate at death.

    • Severs into a tenancy in common if any interests sever.

    • Jurisdictions require clarity in creation of joint tenancies.

  4. Tenancy by the Entirety

    • Elements:

      • Between spouses only; right of survivorship; requires five unities: Time, Title, Interest, Possession, and Marriage.

    • Neither spouse can sever by themselves.

  5. Presumptions

    • Older law presumes it creates a joint tenancy; modern law prefers a tenancy in common in uncertainty.

    • Tenancy by the entirety has no right to partition by one spouse alone.

  6. Mortgage Theories

    • Title Theory: Title passes to the mortgagee, but they have a right of redemption.

    • Lien Theory: The title is only a security title.

  7. Resolving disagreements between co-tenants

    • Options include voluntary agents, partitions (both types), and accounting for contributions.

B. Marital Interests
  1. Types of Jurisdictions

    • Common Law Marital Property States: Only separate property considered.

    • Community Property States: Community property and separate property recognized.

  2. Common Law States

    • Spouses have separate property; property acquisition varies; many started adopting the Married Women's Property Acts.

  3. Types of Jurisdictions that Influence Tenancy by Entirety Subject to Creditors

    • Four distinct groups establish the reach of creditor claims in its share.

  4. Distribution at Death

    • Determines who takes personal and real property upon marital death based on marriage and state laws.