‘Henry VIII was content to allow ministers to “rule” for him’ Assess the validity of this view between the years 1526-1547
Paragraph 1: Delegation to Ministers
Point: Henry VIII relied heavily on ministers like Wolsey and Cromwell to manage the day-to-day operations of governance, allowing them considerable autonomy.
Evidence:
Thomas Wolsey’s Role:
As Lord Chancellor and Cardinal, Wolsey managed domestic policy, legal systems, and foreign relations.
Initiatives like the Eltham Ordinances (1526) aimed at streamlining royal finances and the expansion of the Star Chamber demonstrated his administrative authority.
His dominance ended when he failed to secure the annulment of Henry’s marriage to Catherine of Aragon, illustrating the conditional nature of his power.
Thomas Cromwell’s Reforms:
Cromwell’s leadership in the Reformation Parliament (1529–1536) restructured Church-State relations, including the Act of Supremacy (1534) and the Dissolution of the Monasteries (1536–1542).
He leveraged anti-clerical sentiment to assert royal supremacy but operated under Henry’s approval.
Explanation: While Wolsey and Cromwell exercised considerable influence, their authority was contingent on Henry’s objectives and trust.
Paragraph 2: Henry’s Active Involvement in Key Decisions
Point: Despite delegating extensively, Henry VIII retained control over critical decisions, particularly those involving his personal life and the direction of religious policy.
Evidence:
The King’s Great Matter:
Henry’s determination to annul his marriage to Catherine of Aragon drove Wolsey’s efforts and, later, Cromwell’s strategy to break with Rome.
The failure of Wolsey to deliver a solution led to his downfall in 1529, demonstrating Henry’s decisive role in ministerial appointments and dismissals.
Religious Policy:
Henry personally shaped the content of the Six Articles (1539), which reinforced traditional Catholic doctrines despite Cromwell’s Protestant sympathies.
His involvement in the dissolution of monasteries reflected both his financial motives and his control over ecclesiastical reforms.
Marriage Alliances:
Henry overruled Cromwell’s advice by pursuing Catherine Howard and later Katherine Parr, illustrating his dominance in personal and dynastic matters.
Explanation: Henry’s active role in pivotal moments highlights that he was not content to allow ministers to “rule” independently but instead used them as instruments to achieve his aims.
Paragraph 3: Governance in Henry’s Later Years
Point: In his final years, Henry VIII’s declining health and the restoration of conciliar government led to increased factionalism, but he continued to exert control over his ministers and court politics.
Evidence:
Factional Rivalries:
Following Cromwell’s fall in 1540, power shifted to a conciliar style of government dominated by competing factions.
Henry manipulated these rivalries, balancing the conservative Norfolk faction against reformists like Edward Seymour.
Katherine Parr’s Influence:
Henry’s marriage to Katherine Parr in 1543 bolstered Protestant reform efforts, indicating his strategic choices despite factional pressures.
Final Years:
Henry’s imprisonment of Norfolk and his son in 1546 reflected his continued ability to neutralize threats and assert authority even in his declining years.
Explanation: While factionalism grew in the later years, Henry maintained ultimate authority, ensuring that no minister or faction ruled unchecked.