Categorical Syllogisms Notes
Categorical Syllogisms and the Logic of Arguments
Argument and Syllogisms
Argument
An argument contains a minimum of two statements:
Premise
Conclusion
Instances of reasoning concerning which it is claimed that some statement(s) provides evidence for the truth of some other statement.
Deductive vs. Inductive Arguments
Deductive: Conclusion proceeds from a universal proposition to a particular proposition.
General to Specific/Particular.
Inductive: Conclusion proceeds from a particular instance to a universal proposition.
Specific/Particular to General.
Syllogism
A syllogism is a deductive argument consisting of:
Two premises
One conclusion
Includes categorical propositions.
Must be in standard form.
Represents a connected thought.
Syllogism: Standard Form
Major Premise
Minor Premise
Conclusion
Example
Major Premise: All persons are intellectual beings.
Minor Premise: Plato is a person.
Conclusion: Therefore, Plato is an intellectual being.
Syllogism: Terms
Major Term (P)
Minor Term (S)
Middle Term (M)
Example
All wide readers are knowledgeable.
Alex is a wide reader.
Hence, Alex is knowledgeable.
Major Term (P)
In the example:
All wide readers are knowledgeable.
Alex is a wide reader.
Hence, Alex is knowledgeable.
The major term is "knowledgeable."
It is the predicate of the conclusion.
It is the predicate of the major premise.
Minor Term (S)
In the example:
All wide readers are knowledgeable.
Alex is a wide reader.
Hence, Alex is knowledgeable.
The minor term is "Alex."
It is the subject of the conclusion.
It is the subject of the minor premise.
Middle Term (M)
In the example:
All wide readers are knowledgeable.
Alex is a wide reader.
Hence, Alex is knowledgeable.
The middle term is "wide reader."
It is found in both premises, but not in the conclusion.
Validity and Soundness
Form and Content
Form: Refers to the structure or pattern of an argument.
Content: Refers to the subject matter of an argument.
Validity
Analyze the form of the argument.
Concerns only the form, not the content.
Only deductive arguments can be valid or invalid.
Soundness
Only attributed to deductive arguments.
Concerns both content and form.
A valid argument that contains only true premises is sound.
Figures of Categorical Syllogisms
First Figure: SUB-PRE
\begin{aligned}
M &P \
S &M \
\therefore S &P
\end{aligned}
M is the subject of the major premise and the predicate of the minor premise.
Second Figure: PRE-PRE
\begin{aligned}
P &M \
S &M \
\therefore S &P
\end{aligned}
M is the predicate of the major premise and the predicate of the minor premise.
Third Figure: SUB-SUB
\begin{aligned}
M &P \
M &S \
\therefore S &P
\end{aligned}
M is the subject of the major premise and the subject of the minor premise.
Fourth Figure: PRE-SUB
\begin{aligned}
P &M \
M &S \
\therefore S &P
\end{aligned}
M is the predicate of the major premise and the subject of the minor premise.
Moods of Categorical Syllogisms
Refers to the different arrangements of the four types of propositions (A, E, I, O).
Only 19 of these arrangements follow the rules of correct deduction (VALID).
These 19 moods are derived from mnemonic verses.
First Figure Moods
BARBARA
CELARENT
DARII
FERIO
Second Figure Moods
CESARE
CAMESTRES
FESTINO
BAROCO
Third Figure Moods
DARAPTI
FELAPTON
DISAMIS
DATISI
BOCARDO
FERISON
Fourth Figure Moods
CAMENES
DIMARIS
FESAPO
FRESISON
BRAMANTIP
Example Application
Some deadly weapons are grenades; But, all grenades are explosives; Therefore, some explosives are deadly weapons.
Identify the figure (position of middle term)
Identify the proposition of each premise
Look for the mood (arrangement of premises)
Next Steps
Exercise on Categorical Syllogisms:
SFC Syllogism
Figures
Moods
Lecture: Rules on Categorical Syllogisms