Overview of Health Policymaking (CH 4)

Overview of Health Policymaking

Learning Objectives

  • Appreciate frameworks and theories about policymaking.

  • Define the stages heuristic policymaking framework.

  • Explain phases of the policymaking process.

  • Understand the external environment's impact on the policymaking process.

  • Discuss agenda setting and legislative activities during policy formulation.

  • Discuss activities of policy implementation: designing, rulemaking, operating, and evaluating.

  • Discuss the modification phase of policymaking.

  • Discuss interaction between phases of policymaking.

  • Appreciate the political nature of policymaking.

Health Policies Overview

  • Health policies manifest as laws, rules, regulations, implementation decisions, or judicial decisions.

  • All health policies are authoritative decisions made via complex processes.

  • Policymaking is fundamentally a decision-making process applicable to federal, state, and local governments (Bovbjerg, Wiener, and Houseman 2003).

Policy Context Considerations
  • Policy markets' structure and operations as discussed in Chapter 2 help contextualize decisions in health policymaking.

  • Interaction between demanders and suppliers in the policy market sets the stage for complex policymaking processes.

Conceptual Frameworks and Theories of Policymaking

  • Recognition of multiple frameworks and theories enhances understanding of policymaking.

  • Frameworks vs. Theories:

    • Frameworks provide broad descriptive structures.

    • Theories offer testable relationships between variables (Walt et al. 2008). No universally agreed-upon model exists (Sabatier and Weible 2014).

The Stages Heuristic
  • Lasswell's framework (1956) views policymaking as a four-stage process:

    • Agenda Setting

    • Formulation

    • Implementation

    • Evaluation

  • Criticism includes oversimplification, but it remains useful for understanding policymaking stages.

Alternative Frameworks - Policy Triangle
  • Walt and Gilson's Policy Triangle (1994):

    • Examines interactions between actors, contexts, and processes in policymaking.

  • Network Theory:

    • Explains increasing complexity in interactions among numerous actors in policy issues (Sabatier and Weible 2014).

Multiple-Streams and Punctuated-Equilibrium Theories
  • Multiple-Streams Theory (Kingdon 2010):

    • Focuses on agenda-setting; identifies the convergence of problems, solutions, and political circumstances as creating opportunities for policymaking.

  • Punctuated-Equilibrium Theory (Baumgartner and Jones 1993):

    • Describes policymaking as a mix of incremental changes disrupted by rapid shifts.

Real-World Applications of Theories
  • The enactment of Medicare and Medicaid serves as examples of both theories:

    • Multiple-Streams Theory: Highlights convergence of problem identification and legislative action during the Johnson administration.

    • Punctuated-Equilibrium Theory: Reflects how established processes can evolve, as seen with the Medicaid program.

A Core Model of the Public Policymaking Process

  • Policymaking is considered a cyclical process with three overlapping phases:

    • Formulation

    • Implementation

    • Modification

  • Diagram in Exhibit 4.1 illustrates the interaction between these phases and the external environment influencing policymaking decisions.

Formulation Phase
  • Comprises two parts: Agenda Setting and Development of Legislation.

  • Results in public laws or amendments to existing laws. Policies may also be rules and regulations or judicial decisions.

Agenda Setting
  • Initiated by dynamic interactions among problems, possible solutions, and political circumstances.

  • Example: Affordable Care Act (ACA) illustrates how political figures prioritize health issues on the agenda.

Development of Legislation
  • Proposals, called bills, are specific legislative responses following agenda setting.

  • The significance of identifying a window of opportunity (Kingdon 2010) for legislation development.

Legislative Process in the US Congress
  1. Referral to Committee: Bills assigned to committees for consideration.

  2. Committee Action: Examines the bill and assesses chances for passage.

  3. Subcommittee Review: Conducts hearings with stakeholders.

  4. Mark Up: Adjustments made to the bill before recommending to the full committee.

  5. Full Committee Action: Further review and vote on the subcommittee's recommendations.

  6. Written Report: A detailed description of the bill is published.

  7. Scheduling Floor Action: Determined by leadership on legislative calendars.

  8. Debate: Governed by procedural rules related to the debate over the bill.

  9. Voting: Members vote to pass or reject the bill.

  10. Referral to Other Chamber: The bill undergoes similar processes in the other chamber.

  11. Conference Committee Action: Resolves discrepancies between House and Senate versions.

  12. Final Actions: After approval, sent to the president for signature or veto.

  13. Veto Override: Congress can attempt to override a presidential veto with a two-thirds vote.

Key Success Rates in Legislation
  • The percentage of legislation actually approved between 2009-2019 has generally been low (2.3% to 3.3%).

Implementation Phase

  • Signifies a transition to enactment following legislation formulation.

  • Entails managing resources to achieve the goals of public laws, primarily through executive branch agencies.

Key Activities in Implementation
  1. Designing: Crafting the working agenda and organizing for execution.

  2. Rulemaking: Establishing details and regulations for implementing laws.

  3. Operating: Executing the enacted legislation, such as enrolling individuals in Medicaid under ACA.

  4. Evaluating: Assessing effectiveness, costs, and benefits of policies.

Modification Phase

  • Necessary due to the imperfect nature of policymaking and changing environments.

  • Policies evolve over time through feedback loops from implementation experiences.

  • Example: Adjustments in Medicare due to changing healthcare landscapes highlight the necessity of ongoing policy evaluation and modification.

Important Features of the Policymaking Process
  • Interactivity and interdependence of formulation, implementation, and modification phases.

  • Continuous nature of policymaking; decisions are revisited and re-evaluated based on outcomes and contexts.

  • Impact of external factors: biological, demographic, cultural, legal, and technological variables shape policy decisions and responses.

  • Acknowledgment of the political nature of policymaking; decisions are influenced by ethical considerations and competing interests.

Conclusion
  • Policymaking operates in a complex, interactive, and cyclical environment, involving multiple party influences and factors, reflecting public and self-interest interplay, making informed decision-making crucial for effective health policy outcomes.