Overview of Health Policymaking (CH 4)
Overview of Health Policymaking
Learning Objectives
Appreciate frameworks and theories about policymaking.
Define the stages heuristic policymaking framework.
Explain phases of the policymaking process.
Understand the external environment's impact on the policymaking process.
Discuss agenda setting and legislative activities during policy formulation.
Discuss activities of policy implementation: designing, rulemaking, operating, and evaluating.
Discuss the modification phase of policymaking.
Discuss interaction between phases of policymaking.
Appreciate the political nature of policymaking.
Health Policies Overview
Health policies manifest as laws, rules, regulations, implementation decisions, or judicial decisions.
All health policies are authoritative decisions made via complex processes.
Policymaking is fundamentally a decision-making process applicable to federal, state, and local governments (Bovbjerg, Wiener, and Houseman 2003).
Policy Context Considerations
Policy markets' structure and operations as discussed in Chapter 2 help contextualize decisions in health policymaking.
Interaction between demanders and suppliers in the policy market sets the stage for complex policymaking processes.
Conceptual Frameworks and Theories of Policymaking
Recognition of multiple frameworks and theories enhances understanding of policymaking.
Frameworks vs. Theories:
Frameworks provide broad descriptive structures.
Theories offer testable relationships between variables (Walt et al. 2008). No universally agreed-upon model exists (Sabatier and Weible 2014).
The Stages Heuristic
Lasswell's framework (1956) views policymaking as a four-stage process:
Agenda Setting
Formulation
Implementation
Evaluation
Criticism includes oversimplification, but it remains useful for understanding policymaking stages.
Alternative Frameworks - Policy Triangle
Walt and Gilson's Policy Triangle (1994):
Examines interactions between actors, contexts, and processes in policymaking.
Network Theory:
Explains increasing complexity in interactions among numerous actors in policy issues (Sabatier and Weible 2014).
Multiple-Streams and Punctuated-Equilibrium Theories
Multiple-Streams Theory (Kingdon 2010):
Focuses on agenda-setting; identifies the convergence of problems, solutions, and political circumstances as creating opportunities for policymaking.
Punctuated-Equilibrium Theory (Baumgartner and Jones 1993):
Describes policymaking as a mix of incremental changes disrupted by rapid shifts.
Real-World Applications of Theories
The enactment of Medicare and Medicaid serves as examples of both theories:
Multiple-Streams Theory: Highlights convergence of problem identification and legislative action during the Johnson administration.
Punctuated-Equilibrium Theory: Reflects how established processes can evolve, as seen with the Medicaid program.
A Core Model of the Public Policymaking Process
Policymaking is considered a cyclical process with three overlapping phases:
Formulation
Implementation
Modification
Diagram in Exhibit 4.1 illustrates the interaction between these phases and the external environment influencing policymaking decisions.
Formulation Phase
Comprises two parts: Agenda Setting and Development of Legislation.
Results in public laws or amendments to existing laws. Policies may also be rules and regulations or judicial decisions.
Agenda Setting
Initiated by dynamic interactions among problems, possible solutions, and political circumstances.
Example: Affordable Care Act (ACA) illustrates how political figures prioritize health issues on the agenda.
Development of Legislation
Proposals, called bills, are specific legislative responses following agenda setting.
The significance of identifying a window of opportunity (Kingdon 2010) for legislation development.
Legislative Process in the US Congress
Referral to Committee: Bills assigned to committees for consideration.
Committee Action: Examines the bill and assesses chances for passage.
Subcommittee Review: Conducts hearings with stakeholders.
Mark Up: Adjustments made to the bill before recommending to the full committee.
Full Committee Action: Further review and vote on the subcommittee's recommendations.
Written Report: A detailed description of the bill is published.
Scheduling Floor Action: Determined by leadership on legislative calendars.
Debate: Governed by procedural rules related to the debate over the bill.
Voting: Members vote to pass or reject the bill.
Referral to Other Chamber: The bill undergoes similar processes in the other chamber.
Conference Committee Action: Resolves discrepancies between House and Senate versions.
Final Actions: After approval, sent to the president for signature or veto.
Veto Override: Congress can attempt to override a presidential veto with a two-thirds vote.
Key Success Rates in Legislation
The percentage of legislation actually approved between 2009-2019 has generally been low (2.3% to 3.3%).
Implementation Phase
Signifies a transition to enactment following legislation formulation.
Entails managing resources to achieve the goals of public laws, primarily through executive branch agencies.
Key Activities in Implementation
Designing: Crafting the working agenda and organizing for execution.
Rulemaking: Establishing details and regulations for implementing laws.
Operating: Executing the enacted legislation, such as enrolling individuals in Medicaid under ACA.
Evaluating: Assessing effectiveness, costs, and benefits of policies.
Modification Phase
Necessary due to the imperfect nature of policymaking and changing environments.
Policies evolve over time through feedback loops from implementation experiences.
Example: Adjustments in Medicare due to changing healthcare landscapes highlight the necessity of ongoing policy evaluation and modification.
Important Features of the Policymaking Process
Interactivity and interdependence of formulation, implementation, and modification phases.
Continuous nature of policymaking; decisions are revisited and re-evaluated based on outcomes and contexts.
Impact of external factors: biological, demographic, cultural, legal, and technological variables shape policy decisions and responses.
Acknowledgment of the political nature of policymaking; decisions are influenced by ethical considerations and competing interests.
Conclusion
Policymaking operates in a complex, interactive, and cyclical environment, involving multiple party influences and factors, reflecting public and self-interest interplay, making informed decision-making crucial for effective health policy outcomes.