Qualitative Research
Qualitative Research
gain holistic pictures or in-depth understanding of perceptions and experiences
focus on words, observations, or documents/materials to understand a phenomenon or event
Understand meaning within cultures, among religions and genders
flexible and emergent
Major types of Qualitative Research
Phenomenology- description and interpretation of human experience
Phenomenology
Descriptive phenomenology
describe human experience
as people experience them
hearing
seeing
believing
feeling
deciding
used to better understand poorly understood aspects of experiences
researcher identifies and acknowledges own preconceived beliefs and opinions about the phenomenon
reflexive journaling
Interpretation/Hermeneutic Phenomenology
emphasis on interpreting and understanding experience, not just describing it
reflexivity does not occur
Hermeneutic- examines contextual features of an experience such as gender, employment, or well-being of people or groups with the experience
Hermeneutic circle
researchers prior understanding, experiences, and worldview are seen as part of the interpretive process
researchers background cannot be separated from the interpretation
engage in the hermeneutic circle
moving back and forth between the parts
Grounded Theory
“What is the process of patterns behavior”
creates a theory about what’s in the data
Focus- basic social psychology problems that defined group of people experience and how people come to resolve a problem or concern
Coding
broad categories that later add an action to develop categories for information to understand themes
Broad category → action → categories → themes
the reason for smaller studies
multiple types of comparisons
data-data
data-code
code-code
code-category
category-category
Ethnography
Culture- the way people live (patterns, symbolic structures, values, norms)
Study of a social group’s culture
Extensive fieldwork
the hours do not end until the new information is no longer repetitive
sometimes months or years
cultured inferred from words, actions, and products of its members
Assumption: culture guides the way people structure their experiences
uses multiple sources of data
observation
focus groups
field notes (write down all observations like a diary or journal)
pictures
artifacts
thick descriptions/detailed descriptions of cultural behavior
Qualitative sampling
snowball sampling- network sampling
reaching out to everyone you know and they reach out
large sample acquired
purposive sampling- researchers deliberately choose cases or participants who best contribute to the study
Theoretical sampling- decisions about where to find data and members or a group who best contribute while collecting and analyzing data
similar to purposive, but referenced most in grounded theory
ongoing and occurs while continuing to gather data
Self-Report Techniques
Unstructured interviews
conventional, total flexibility
open-ended questions
“What happened when you learned your partner had stage 4 breast cancer?”
Semi-structured Interviews
Use of topic guide
“Whom did you share the finding of breast cancer with?”
“How would you describe the emotions you felt?”
Focus Groups
interviews in small groups (5-10 people)
led by a moderator
Diaries
source in historical research
ability to record a thing in real time
limits recall bias
people may change what they write knowing someone else will read it
provides intimate detail of daily life
Observational method
unstructured observation in natural settings
aka field notes
includes participant observation
Recording Observations
logs- daily record of events and conversations
Field notes/ memo writing- broader and more interpretive and represents researcher’s efforts to record, synthesize, and understand data
Audit Trail
record of steps, decisions, and processes
“Paper trail”
Shows how data was collected, analyzed, and interpreted
Analysis Approaches
Usually, multiple approaches are used at the same time to analyze a piece of information
Phenomenological Analysis
Mised Approach - Member-checking
Holistic approach - entire text to understand its meaning
Selective approach- pull out essential statements
Detailed approach- analyzed line-by-line
Ethnographic analysis- continue to look for patterns and compare one pattern against another
Grounded Theory analysis- uses constancy comparative analysis to constantly compare one source of that to another to see if they are similar
allows for theory development
Findings/ results
description of participants
description of themes
a lot of quotes to support themes
Discussion
implications for practice
Limitations
conclusion
Trustworthiness and Integrity
Credibility
carrying out the study in a way that enhances the believability
assessing quality and integrity of study
Researcher Credibility- having experience or background related to phenomenon
Dependability
consistency of data over time and in different situations
use audit trail of what was done
Confirmability
impartial and limited bias
Reflexivity - keeping notes of attitudes and preconceptions
member-checking- feedback form participants about emerging themes
Data Triangulation- use of multiple data sources or collection techniques to validate conclusions
Transferability
finding transferred to other settings
like generalizability in quantitative research
Additional Strategies
prolonged engagement- sufficient time to gain in-depth understanding
persistent observation- depth and focus of observation
thick and contextualized description- vivid portrayal of study participants, their context, and the phenomenon under study