Syllabus Summary
ENGL 327W – Advanced Composition (Fall 2025)
Time & Location: Tues/Thurs 9:30–10:45 AM, Darden College Room 1114
Instructor: Dr. Michelle Fowler-Amato
Office Hours: Tues/Thurs 11:00 AM–12:00 PM, BAL 5030, or by appointment (Zoom available)
Email: mfowlera@odu.edu
Course Overview
Focus: Develop mature, professional expository writing.
Emphasis on qualitative research, inquiry within a community, and professional writing.
Writing-intensive course; involves reflection, analysis, and data-informed writing.
Students will produce writing about and for a community, incorporating qualitative research techniques.
Prerequisites: C or better in ENGL 110C and C or better in ENGL 211C, 221C, or 231C.
Course Texts & Materials
Main Text: Hurst, Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods (OER)
Additional readings shared via Canvas/Google folder
Tools: ODU MIDAS, Canvas, Google Folder, course texts
Student Learning Outcomes
Students will:
Understand research processes and qualitative methods
Collect and analyze qualitative data
Engage in writing “in process” informed by community research
Reflect on rhetorical situations and integrate own thinking with sources
Revise and edit texts effectively
Experience collaborative and social aspects of writing
Reading & Writing Approach
Reading:
Read rhetorically (analyze effect on audience)
Read like researchers (analyze community data)
Read like writers (consider genre, audience, purpose)
Engagement:
Annotated readings (SQ3R method encouraged)
Coding and memos from collected data
Class discussions & noticing lists
Assignments
Reading Invitations – 15 points
Annotation checks (5 unannounced, 2 makeups allowed)
Reflect on how readings inform your writing
Composing Invitations – 105 points
Portfolio of collected/analyzed data + project plan (25 pts)
Community profile + reflection (25 pts)
Community advocacy project + reflection (25 pts)
Vlog demonstrating skills/techniques learned (10 pts)
Active participation in workshops, conferences, and peer review affects grading
Policies & Guidelines
Attendance & Preparation:
Miss ≤2 classes without penalty; >4 classes may result in F
Must be prepared with readings/assignments each class
Assignment Submission:
Submit via class Google folder (not Canvas)
Student folder = submissions to instructor, collaboration folder = shared with class
Late Work:
Only accepted if arranged prior; due before grade posting
Technology & AI:
Devices should support class, not distract
AI use permitted only as specified per assignment, with proper citations
Academic Integrity: Plagiarism strictly prohibited; follow ODU Honor Code
Accessibility & Support:
Contact instructor or OEA for accommodations
Writing Center and ePortfolio support available
Key Takeaways
Focus on qualitative research in a community setting
Writing is iterative: research, draft, revise, reflect
Active participation in class, workshops, and peer feedback is essential
All work must follow academic integrity and accessibility standards
BOLDED WHEN YOU ACTUALLY HAVE TO HAVE SOMETHING SUBMITTED INTO A FOLDER
Week | Date | In Class (Doing the day of in class) | Bring / Do Before Class / Homework (what you should have before class) |
|---|---|---|---|
1 | 8/26 | Introduction to Course: syllabus review, discuss research | Laptop/device to access Google folder |
1 | 8/28 | Review syllabus expectations, student info sheet, set up Google folder, intro to SQ3R | Read Hurst Ch. 1: “What is Research?”, “What is Qualitative Research?”, “Examples of Qualitative Research”; take notes; bring digital tool to interact with folder |
2 | 9/2 | Deadline to drop w/no penalty; Select a community, intro to Kami, download Hurst | Read Young & Redding excerpts; have Hurst Ch.1 downloaded in folder |
2 | 9/4 | Observation protocol workshop; inquiring into a community | Read Hurst Ch.13 “Participant Observation”; plan for observing community |
3 | 9/9 | Observing/Participating & Interviewing; workshop observation protocol | Visit community, observe, gather artifacts; plan observation participation |
3 | 9/11 | Interview protocol & data analysis workshop | Visit community again; draft interview questions; gather artifacts |
4 | 9/16 | Mining for artifacts; analytic memos; interview protocol workshop | Visit & interview community; collect artifacts; take field notes |
4 | 9/18 | Data analysis workshop; coding | Continue community visits/interviews; gather artifacts; code data |
5 | 9/23 | Data analysis workshop | Complete independent data analysis; submit interview transcripts & artifacts |
5 | 9/25 | Portfolio project workshop: data analysis & envisioning | Continue data analysis; review Hurst Ch.7 “Reflexivity” & Ch.8 “Ethics”; plan portfolio |
6 | 9/30 | Portfolio project drafting workshop | Complete data analysis; draft portfolio components |
6 | 10/2 | No official class meeting | Independent portfolio revision & preparation |
7 | 10/7 | Portfolio editing/peer review workshop | Prepare portfolio for submission |
7 | 10/9 | Portfolio publication event; start secondary research for advocacy project | Submit portfolio; begin research for community advocacy project |
8 | 10/14 | No official class (Fall Break) | — |
8 | 10/16 | Community Profile workshop: envisioning | Read/annotate 1 source to support advocacy project |
9 | 10/21 | Community Profile workshop: envisioning & drafting | Draft community profile; annotate 1 source to support advocacy project |
9 | 10/23 | Community Profile revising workshop | Submit Draft 1 in collaboration folder |
10 | 10/28 | No official class | Conferences (10/24,10/28,10/29); revise profile; read/annotate sources |
10 | 10/30 | Community Profile editing/peer review | Submit Draft 2 in collaboration folder |
11 | 11/4 | No official class (Election Day) | — |
11 | 11/6 | Community Profile publication event; workshop envisioning | Submit community profile in collaboration folder |
12 | 11/11 | Community Advocacy Project workshop: envisioning & drafting | Submit revised community profile + connected reflection in student folder |
12 | 11/13 | Advocacy project catch-up & drafting workshop | Have ≥3 annotated sources for advocacy project |
13 | 11/18 | Advocacy Project workshop: revising; Vlog intro | Submit Draft 1 advocacy project in collaboration folder |
13 | 11/20 | No official class | Revise advocacy project; envision Vlog |
14 | 11/25 | No official class | Revise advocacy project; draft Vlog |
14 | 11/27 | Thanksgiving Holiday | — |
15 | 12/2 | Advocacy Project workshop: editing/peer review; Vlog independent revision | Submit Draft 2 advocacy project in collaboration folder |
15 | 12/4 | Advocacy Project publication event; Vlog peer review | Submit advocacy project in collaboration folder |
16 | 12/9 | No official class | Submit revised advocacy project + reflection in student folder; submit Vlog |
Sorry for the confusion! Let me break it down a bit:
Instead of doing the rereading, thinking critically, and then starting your note-taking all at once, I was suggesting that you might try doing a bit of note-taking after each reread.
So, here’s the idea:
First reread: Read the paragraph and think critically about it. What’s the main point? Do you agree? What’s the author’s argument? After this, you could jot down a quick note or a question right after you process it.
Second reread: Do the same thing—think through the meaning, but now, your note could be more detailed. If you have any questions or reactions, write those down, too.
So, “thinking through the meaning” just means understanding what the author is saying and figuring out what it means to you. It’s like this:
What is the author saying, in simple terms?
If the paragraph is confusing, try to break it down into one or two sentences in your own words. What’s the author trying to get across?
Why is the author saying it?
Is the author trying to convince you of something? Explain something? Give an example? It’s important to ask why the author is saying what they’re saying.
Does it make sense to you?
If something doesn’t make sense, ask yourself, “Why doesn’t it make sense?” What part of it confuses you? That’s a signal to go back and reread, or even look up unfamiliar terms.
How does it fit with everything else?
Once you understand this part, think about how it relates to what you’ve already read. Does it support the main argument? Is it a new idea, or is it building on something from earlier?
Writing Center
ePortfolio Support center