Propounded by W. Arthur Lewis, published in 1954 (The Manchester School).
Central to development economics, especially for labour-abundant, capital-scarce economies (typical of underdeveloped countries or UDCs).
The theory is also known as the "Dual Sector Model".
Labour surplus from the subsistence sector can be absorbed by the capitalist sector.
Growth is driven by:
Labour transfer
Reinvestment of capitalist surplus
Capital accumulation
Objective: Bring underdeveloped economies into self-sustaining growth.
Unlimited labour supply at a constant wage from the subsistence sector.
Economy is dualistic:
Capitalist sector: modern, industrial, profit-oriented.
Subsistence sector: traditional, agriculture-based, low productivity.
Capitalists reinvest all profits.
Urban wages > rural wages to attract migration.
Capitalist output per worker > subsistence output per worker.
Subsistence Sector:
Labour-intensive, agricultural.
Very low productivity.
No significant surplus generation.
Capitalist Sector:
Utilizes capital and wage labour.
Generates profits due to higher productivity.
Sector is expanding through surplus reinvestment.
Mechanism:
Labour moves from rural to urban.
Capitalist sector grows → absorbs more workers → wages in subsistence sector rise when surplus is exhausted.
Capitalist surplus = Marginal Product of Labour (MPL) − Wage (W).
This surplus is:
Reinvested → boosts capital stock.
Creates more jobs → absorbs more labour from agriculture.
Continues until surplus labour is exhausted.
🧠 Example: Textile industry in early industrial Britain absorbing rural workers into mills.
Wage in capitalist sector (OW) > subsistence wage (OS).
Supply curve of labour (WW) is horizontal — perfectly elastic.
As surplus is reinvested:
MPL shifts upward.
More employment (E1 to E2).
Surplus = area between MPL and wage line.
📈 When surplus labour is absorbed, the supply curve starts sloping upward, leading to wage rise.
Growth halts when:
Wages rise in capitalist sector → profit margins shrink.
Subsistence productivity increases due to:
Reduced labour in agriculture.
Better resource allocation.
Technological improvements.
Labour becomes organized → demands higher wages.
Surplus diminishes → no incentive for further investment.
Over-simplistic assumptions (perfect elasticity, full reinvestment).
Ignores labour-saving technologies.
One-sided: focuses only on supply side (labour).
No attention to human capital, skills mismatch.
Assumes easy migration, which is not always feasible.
Fails in situations where new capital replaces labour.
Despite criticisms, it remains a foundational model in development economics.
Especially relevant to labour-surplus economies transitioning to industrialization.
Lewis Model explains how unlimited labour from agriculture moves to modern industry.
Capitalist sector reinvests surplus, driving job creation and growth.
Model continues until surplus labour is absorbed, then wages rise, and growth slows.
Major criticisms: unrealistic assumptions, ignores technology, and complex migration dynamics.
scss
[Subsistence Sector]
↓
(Surplus Labour)
↓
[Capitalist Sector (Pays Higher Wage)]
↓
[Labour Shifts]
↓
[Surplus Generated = MPL - Wage]
↓
[Surplus Reinvested → More Capital → More Jobs]
↓
[Labour Absorption Continues]
↓
[Surplus Labour Exhausted → Wage Rises]
↓
[End of Growth Process]