Code of Conduct SR

The Code of Conduct

Lesson Preparation

  • Read: The Code of Conduct student reader.

Cognitive Lesson Objectives

  • Understand: Principles of the Code of Conduct.

Cognitive Measurable Samples of Behavior

  • Distinguish: Correct courses of action in accordance with each article of the Code.

  • Summarize: Interrelation of the Core Values and the Code of Conduct.

Affective Lesson Objectives

  • Respond: Value of the Code of Conduct to you as an officer.

Affective Measurable Samples of Behavior

  • Voluntarily discuss: Value of the Code of Conduct.

  • Voluntarily discuss: Correct courses of action in accordance with the Code of Conduct.


Inspiration: Captain Lance Sijan

  • Quotes: “SIJAN! MY NAME IS LANCE PETER SIJAN!” — Captures the spirit of resilience.

  • Heroism: Capt. Sijan, an F-4C pilot, shot down on November 9, 1967, survived a crash and evaded capture for 45 days.

  • Injuries: Sijan suffered serious injuries (compound leg fracture, skull fracture).

  • Escape Attempts: Escaped shortly after capture; displayed commitment to the Code of Conduct by refusing to disclose information.

  • Recognition: First graduate of the U.S. Air Force Academy to posthumously receive the Medal of Honor in 1976.

  • Significance of the Code: Demonstrates the enduring value of the Code of Conduct.


Historical Context

  • Background: The Code of Conduct was officially signed into law by President Eisenhower in 1955 (Executive Order 10631).

  • Revisions: Significant changes made by President Carter in 1977 (Executive Order 12017) reflect evolving warfare dynamics.

  • Article V: Originally gave legal but not moral guidance; revised to emphasize the ethical dimension amidst changing enemy tactics post-Vietnam.

  • Lessons Learned: POW experiences yielded insights into handling interrogations, resulting in moral dilemmas regarding torture versus adherence to the Code.


Dilemmas and Revisions of the Code

  • Captain John Dramesi: Example of conflict between directives to escape and obey orders.

  • Changes to Article V: Shift from "bound" to "required", indicating a move from legal obligation to ethical guidance.

  • Practical Guidance: The 1977 revision loosened the rigid adherence, recognizing human limitations under torture.

  • Command Responsibility: Leaders must uphold the Code while maximizing opportunities for others to adhere to it.


Code of the US Fighting Force

  • Mission: Protect the nation against enemies in combat or captivity.

  • Code of Conduct: Derived from American military history, evolving through combat experiences.

  • Obligations: Duty to oppose enemies and uphold values of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

  • Government Responsibility: Support and care for POWs, including their families, during and after detainment.


Articles of the Code of Conduct

  • Article I: Duty to fight for the defense of the American way of life. Medical and chaplain personnel may have flexibility in fulfilling their tasks.

  • Article II: Members must never surrender willingly or compromise their command.

  • Article III: POWs must continue to resist and make every effort to escape; must not accept parole or special favors.

  • Article IV: Maintain solidarity with fellow prisoners; no harm to comrades; leaders must be established within the camp.

  • Article V: POWs are to give only name, rank, service number, and date of birth when questioned; avoid compromising statements.

  • Article VI: Commitment to American values; POWs should trust their country even under duress.


Guidance for Peacetime Captivity

  • Situations: Military personnel may face different challenges in peacetime captivity, such as abduction by unfriendly governments or terrorist groups.

  • Conduct: Maintain military bearing; remain calm and courteous to support long-term survival.

  • Escape Considerations: Careful evaluations of risks versus benefits for escape attempts, emphasizing personal dignity even in captivity.

  • Engagement with Captors: Building rapport without compromising integrity; maintain a non-combative demeanor in hostage situations.


Conclusion

  • Leadership Responsibilities: The obligations of leaders remain consistent, regardless of the context. Upholding the Code of Conduct is essential for ensuring dignity and honor in both combat and captivity.