Comprehensive Study Notes: Business Ethics and Social Responsibility
PAGE 1
CHAPTER 1: Why Study Ethics?
DISCUSSION CASE: Facebook
Corporate Profile (Numerical Data)
Founding: 2004.
Active Users: Almost billion total; billion daily users.
Financial Standing: billion market capitalization; billion annual revenue.
Ranking: Sixth largest publicly traded company; on the Fortune 500 list.
Historical Ethical Challenges
Early Privacy Issues: Criticism began within two years of founding regarding the News Feed feature using unintended information.
Beacon Advertising System: Facebook collected third-party website data to target users’ friends based on browsing activity; resulted in a legal settlement with the FTC requiring limits on data use.
2021 Apple Dispute: Apple's iOS update introduced "App Tracking Transparency," requiring apps to let users opt-out of tracking.
Apple's Stance: CEO Tim Cook defines privacy as a "human right" and "civil liberty."
Impact: Tracking and selling data is the core of Facebook's business model, creating a fundamental conflict.
Misinformation and Political Scandals
2016 US Election: Facebook facilitated misinformation and was a platform for Russian interference. In , executives testified before Congress.
Russian Activity Data:
Initial report: ads reached million Americans.
Revised report: items viewed by million people, forwarded to million more.
Estimate: million people exposed between and .
Russian Strategy: Aggravating social tensions (e.g., Black Lives Matter, gun rights) by promoting opposing rallies at the same time/place and creating fake accounts/groups.
PAGE 2
Institutional Defenses and Cambridge Analytica
Facebook’s Initial Response: Mark Zuckerberg called the idea of influencing the election "pretty crazy." The company claimed it was a communication platform, not a media company, and prioritized security/reliability over content policing.
Cambridge Analytica Scandal ():
Psychology researcher Aleksandr Kogan developed a personality test app used by accounts.
Data Harvesting: Collected data on users and all their "friends" (who did not consent), totaling over million people.
Psychographic Profiling: Cambridge Analytica used this to create million profiles for political consultancy (used by Trump and Ted Cruz campaigns, and the "Brexit" campaign).
The Whistleblower (Frances Haugen)
Disclosures (): Internal documents released to The Wall Street Journal and "60 Minutes."
Findings: Facebook allegedly prioritized profits over public good, ignoring internal research on sex trafficking, drug cartels, hate speech, and harmful impacts on children.
Sophie Zhang (): Revealed Facebook knew foreign governments used the platform to manipulate citizens but chose not to address it.
PAGE 3
1.1 Business Ethics: The What and The Why
Definitions of Ethics
Practical Sense: The opinions, beliefs, and values that guide personal and organizational lives.
Academic Sense: A field of study that evaluates the reasonableness of those values.
Descriptive vs. Normative Ethics
Descriptive Ethics: Describing and learning about actual opinions and values (philosophy as information).
Normative Ethics: Helping individuals become more ethical and create ethical institutions (doing ethics).
Multidisciplinary Nature
Philosophical Ethics: Rights, duties, social justice, and the common good.
Social Sciences: Psychology (motivation), sociology, and organizational behavior.
Broader Structures: Law, economics, and political science.
1.2 Ethics, Morality, and Social Justice
Ethos vs. Philosophy
Ethos: Conforming to the customs and expectations of one's culture/family (the "default" position).
Philosophy: Stepping back to examine cultural norms using reason. Socrates' model: "The unexamined life is not worth living."
Personal Morality vs. Social Ethics
Morality: Individual-focused questioning: "How should I live? What kind of person should I be?"
Social Ethics (Social Justice): Collective-focused: "How should society/business be structured?"
PAGE 4
1.3 Business Ethics as Responsible Decision Making
The Gap Between Judgment and Behavior
Knowing what is right does not always lead to doing what is right (strength of character/motivation).
The Middle Ground
Avoids Dogmatism (preaching one "correct" answer) and Relativism (all opinions are equal).
Focus: The process of reasoning. It requires an accurate account of facts, intellectual rigor, and an open mind.
1.4 Skeptical Challenge I: Isn’t the Law Enough?
The Failure of Legal Compliance Alone
Ambiguity: Laws like the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) require "reasonable accommodations," but what counts as a disability often "depends" on the context.
Case Law: Many acts are only illegal after a court rules them so. Accountants often "push the envelope" until challenged.
Lagging Law: Privacy laws written for paper files do not always apply clearly to cloud computing or digital tracking.
Ethical Floor: Many legal acts are unethical (e.g., firing people over Zoom, as done by Better.com CEO Vishal Garg).
PAGE 5
1.5 Skeptical Challenge II: Ethical Relativism
Core Tenet
The belief that ethical values are relative to individual opinion or culture, denying a rational basis for judgment. It equates ethos with ethics.
Refuting Relativism
Standard of Proof: Ethics shouldn't be held to a "math-like" certainty; most disciplines (management, medicine) aren't mathematically certain.
Disagreement vs. Validity: Disagreement (e.g., whether the Earth is flat) doesn't mean all views are equally valid.
Universal Standards: Some acts (genocide, torture, child abuse) are universally condemned, suggesting a cross-cultural ethical foundation.
Tolerance: If relativism were true, we couldn't even defend the value of "tolerance" as a legitimate social virtue against intolerant people.
1.6 A Model for Ethical Decision Making
The Step-by-Step Process
Determine the Facts: Requires an unbiased understanding. (Reality Check: "Alternative facts" and "Fake news" complicate this).
Identify Ethical Issues: Distinguish economic/legal issues from ethical ones.
Identify Stakeholders: Who is harmed/benefited?
Consider Alternatives: Use "Moral Imagination."
Apply the "New York Times Test": Would you be comfortable with this on the front page?
Make and Monitor Decision: An iterative process (Think–Choose–Act–Think).
PAGE 6
CHAPTER 2: Ethical Theory and Business
DISCUSSION CASE: CEO Compensation vs. Minimum Wage
The Pay Gap Statistics
Apple (): Tim Cook received million, which is times the median salary ().
Historical Trend (Economic Policy Institute):
: Ratio was .
: Ratio was .
: Ratio was .
: Ratio was .
: Ratio was .
: Ratio was .
Case Study: Mylan and the EpiPen
Cost of Production: Device cost < ; drug cost < per dose.
Price Hikes: From < () to over () for a two-pack.
Executive Pay: CEO Heather Bresch’s pay rose from M to M ( increase) while wholesale price rose .
Controversy: Accusations of price gouging on a life-saving device for children.
US Minimum Wage
Rate: per hour (unchanged since ).
Purchasing Power: Has dropped > in years due to inflation.
2.1 Introduction to Ethical Theories
Virtue Ethics: Focused on character (e.g., greed vs. integrity).
Utilitarianism: Focused on social consequences (maximize happiness).
Principle-Based (Deontology): Focused on duties, rights, and fairness.
PAGE 7
2.2 Virtue Ethics
Focus
Character traits and habits (virtues like honesty, integrity, compassion; vices like arrogance, greed).
Key Question: "What kind of person should I be?"
Challenges
Practical: Can virtue be taught? (Role of corporate culture).
Critical: Why be virtuous? (Answer: To live a fulfilling, good human life).
Psychological Egoism
A theory asserting humans are naturally selfish.
Refutation: Humans frequently act for others (parents, friends). Feeling good after helping someone is a consequence, not necessarily the primary motivation.
2.3 Utilitarian Ethics
Core Philosophy
"The greatest good for the greatest number." A consequentialist, pragmatic approach.
Jeremy Bentham: Focused on maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain.
John Stuart Mill: Argued for "qualitative" happiness (intellectual over sensory). "Better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied."
Utilitarianism and Free Markets
The market satisfies consumer preferences (utility).
Efficiency is seen as the tool to maximize social welfare.
Challenges
Measurement: How to quantify happiness (Bentham's "hedonistic calculus").
Rights Violation: Utilitarianism might sacrifice an individual's rights for the majority's benefit (e.g., health care distribution).
PAGE 8
2.5 Utilitarianism and Business Policy
Two Versions of Public Policy
Expert/Bureaucratic: Social science experts determine policies to maximize the common good (e.g., The Fed setting interest rates).
Market: Competition and property rights allow the "invisible hand" to maximize satisfaction.
2.6 Rights, Duties, and Deontology
The Categorical Imperative (Immanuel Kant)
Universal Law: Act only on maxims that could be universalized.
Ends vs. Means: Never treat humans as a mere means, but always as ends (subjects with their own purposes).
Moral Rights
Rights protect central human interests (e.g., health, safety, privacy) from being traded away for happiness.
Autonomy: The human capacity to make rational choices is the basis for dignity and rights (Liberty and Equality).
PAGE 9
CHAPTER 3: Corporate Social Responsibility
DISCUSSION CASE: Section 230
Definition
"No provider… of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher… of any information provided by another."
Immunity: Tech platforms (Facebook, Twitter) are legally immune for content posted by users, unlike newspapers.
The Controversy
Business Model: Profit is tied to engagement (clicks), incentivizing the hosting of harmful content like pornography, sex trafficking ads (Craigslist/Backpage), and toxic gossip (TheDirty.com).
Content Moderation: Limits of Section were reached regarding sex trafficking and incitement of violence (e.g., banning Trump in ).
3.2 The Economic Model of CSR
Shareholder Primacy (Milton Friedman)
Thesis: Manager's only responsibility is to maximize profits within the law without fraud.
Rationale:
Utilitarian: Efficient markets produce the most good.
Property: The business belongs to shareholders; managers are their agents.
3.3 Critical Assessment: Market Failures
Externalities: Pollution (greenhouse gases) where costs are paid by third parties.
Public Goods: No pricing mechanism for clean air or stable climate.
Prisoner’s Dilemmas: Individual rational self-interest leads to collective harm (e.g., everyone buying an SUV leading to smog).
First-Generation Problem: We only learn about harms after they happen to the first generation.
PAGE 10
3.5 The Moral Minimum
Norman Bowie: Pursuit of profit is constrained by an obligation to "cause no harm."
Hierarchy of Duties: Causing no harm (required) vs. Preventing harm/Doing good (praiseworthy but not required).
3.6 The Stakeholder Model
R. Edward Freeman: Managers have responsibilities to all parties affected by business decisions (customers, employees, suppliers, communities).
Basis: Equal respect and consideration for all affected interests.
CEOs in Favor: Business Roundtable () and BlackRock's Larry Fink () endorsed this shift away from shareholder primacy.
3.7 Strategic Model: Benefit Corporations
B-Corps: For-profit entities where social/environmental goals are part of the legal mission.
Sustainability Reporting: Triple Bottom Line (Economic, Environmental, Social).
PAGE 11
CHAPTER 4: Culture, Governance, Leadership
DISCUSSION CASE: Fraud at Wells Fargo
The Scandal ()
Cross-selling Strategy: Goal of "eight is great" (target of products per customer).
The Fraud: Employees opened million unauthorized accounts to meet quotas.
Culture of Cheating: Management provided instructions on forging signatures and creating fake PINs. Whistleblowers were punished.
CEO Pay: John Stumpf saw his stock value increase by M during the fraud period.
4.2 What is Corporate Culture?
Pattern of shared beliefs/meanings that guide thinking and behavior. It is what "organizes" an organization.
Core Values: Essential tenets not compromised for financial gain (Collins & Porras).
4.5 Ethical Leadership
Effective vs. Ethical: A leader can be effective at hitting goals but unethical (e.g., Bernard Madoff).
The Tone at the Top: Leaders must be "socially visible" role models.
Mechanisms: Mission statements, Codes of Conduct, Ethics Hotlines, and Ombudspersons.
PAGE 12
CHAPTER 5: The Meaning and Value of Work
DISCUSSION CASE: Work–Life Balance
Post-Pandemic Trends
The Great Resignation: million Americans left jobs between April and Sept .
Demands: Beyond wages, workers want flexibility and meaningful work.
Work-at-Home (WAH): Blurred the lines between personal space and workspaces.
5.4 Models of Work
Conventional View: Work as drudgery/necessity.
Classical: Avoid work to pursue higher activities (arts/politics).
Hedonistic: Work only to earn money to afford life's pleasures.
Human Fulfillment Model: Work as the primary way humans develop potential (Telos).
Alienation (Marx): Modern work can separate humans from their true selves.
Liberal Model: Middle ground. Value individual choice but protect basic "primary goods" (autonomy/health).
PAGE 13
CHAPTER 6: Moral Rights in the Workplace
The Concept of Rights
Legal: Granted by law.
Contractual: Agreed upon in employment.
Moral/Human: Inherent as a person.
Specific Workplace Rights
Due Process: Protection from arbitrary use of authority. Opposes "Employment at Will."
Participation: Rights to co-determine policy in a democratic workplace (John McCall).
Expression: Conflict between free speech and property rights (e.g., James Damore vs. Google).
Health and Safety: Standards based on "Safe Feasible" vs. "Cost-Benefit Analysis."
Privacy: The right to be "let alone" or control personal information. Issues with electronic monitoring (Humanyze).
PAGE 14
CHAPTER 7: Employee Responsibilities
The Gatekeeper Function
Professionals (auditors, lawyers, analysts) who ensure market integrity. They must avoid Conflicts of Interest.
Subprime Mortgage Crisis (): Analysts gave AAA ratings to high-risk securities because they were paid by the sellers.
Trust and Loyalty
Duska's View: Employees have no duty of loyalty to a firm because firms aren't the kind of thing that merits loyalty (lack of reciprocity).
Bluffing: Albert Carr argues business is like poker; deception is a strategy. Critics argue this erodes trust.
External Issues
Whistle-Blowing: Justified when there is serious harm and internal channels are exhausted (Richard DeGeorge).
Insider Trading: Unfair use of non-public info. Violated fiduciary duty to stockholders.
PAGE 15
CHAPTER 8 & 9: Marketing Ethics
Product Safety (Chapter 8)
Negligence: Failure to exercise reasonable care (Standard: Reasonable Person).
Strict Liability: Producer is accountable for accidents even if not at fault to internalize costs.
Social Harms: Obesity and Opioid epidemics (Food/Biotech industry responsibility).
Advertising and Digital Ethics (Chapter 9)
Deception/Manipulation: Bypassing consumer autonomy.
Targeting Vulnerables: Marketing to children or the fearful elderly.
Digital Challenges:
Dark Patterns: Trick interfaces (Roach motel, forced continuity).
Brain Hacking: Using irregular reward schedules to create digital addiction.
Consumer Privacy: Right to control personal information in the age of big data.
PAGE 16
CHAPTER 10: Sustainability
The Three Pillars
Economic: Meeting present needs.
Environmental: Avoiding ecological degradation.
Social: Addressing poverty and justice.
Natural Capitalism (Hawken & Lovins)
Ecoefficiency: Doing more with less resources.
Biomimicry: Closed-loop production (Cradle-to-Cradle) mimicking nature.
Service Economy: Selling the service (e.g., lighting), not the product (e.g., lightbulbs).
Investing in Natural Capital: Protecting the earth's regenerative capacity.
PAGE 17
CHAPTER 11 & 12: Diversity and Global Business
Workplace Diversity (Chapter 11)
Sexual Harassment: Quid Pro Quo vs. Hostile Work Environment.
Affirmative Action: Positive steps to support equality without changing standards.
Preferential Treatment: Controversial "Strong Affirmative Action" favoring minority status as a qualification.
Globalization (Chapter 12)
Relativism: "When in Rome…" vs. Cross-cultural Human Rights.
The Ruggie Framework: Protect (State), Respect (Corporate), and Remedy.
Race to the Bottom: Global competition leading to lower safety and environmental standards.
National Loyalty: The "Buy American, Hire American" debate in global supply chains.