September 5 Key Concepts: Industrial Growth, Regulation, and Social Darwinism (Late 19th Century)
The Steel Industry
Bessemer converter enabled mass steel production; invented in England; a similar process developed in Kentucky by William Kelly.
Rich deposits of iron ore in Northern Michigan developed; by , American steel production surpassed the combined output of England and Germany.
Andrew Carnegie (Scottish immigrant) dominated the steel industry in the 1870s–80s; by his mills produced about tons per year.
JP Morgan expanded steel interests in the 1890s; in Carnegie sold his stake to Morgan for close to dollars; Morgan then consolidated major American steelmakers.
In , US Steel (United States Steel Corporation) was created; it controlled about of U.S. steel production with an estimated worth of ; the first billion-dollar corporation.
The Oil Industry and Trusts
1859: Edwin Drake drilled America’s first oil well near Titusville, PA.
1870: John D. Rockefeller dominated the oil industry; established Standard Oil Company.
Within a few years, Standard Oil controlled about of America’s oil refining.
1880: Standard Oil Trust formed; stockholders of about 40 corporations assigned voting rights to nine trustees headed by Rockefeller; trust certificates paid dividends but carried no voting power; trustees controlled the 40 corporations and pipelines; trust provided a model for holding companies and semi-trusts.
Trusts sparked public suspicion; late 1880s lawsuits weakened trusts; holding companies became popular in the 1890s; Rockefeller used a holding company chartered in New Jersey to maintain dominance.
Antitrust and Regulation
1890: Sherman Antitrust Act declared contracts, combinations in restraint of trade, and conspiracies in restraint of trade illegal; aimed to break up monopolies and promote competition.
Penalties: maximum fine and/or jail; enforcement weak; definitions left to courts sympathetic to big business.
1895: United States v. E. C. Knight Co. (Sugar). Supreme Court ruled that the American Sugar Refining Company’s dominance (roughly 99% of refining) did not violate the Act; act sometimes used against labor unions; enforcement limitations persisted.
Railroads and Regulation
By , roughly miles of track—more than all of Europe; 1860–1890 added about miles.
Innovations: heavier steel rails, larger locomotives, livestock tanks, refrigerated cars; Pullman Palace Car Company (founded in ) marketed luxury passenger cars; four national time zones (adopted in ) to standardize scheduling; Westinghouse air brake (); automatic couplers.
Railroads helped unify the U.S. and spurred westward settlement; railroads were major consumers of coal and steel; rates fell with competition, but western farmers faced discriminatory increases.
Granger Laws: beginning with Massachusetts () to regulate railroads; Illinois passed rate-regulation laws (, ).
Munn v. Illinois () upheld state regulation of grain warehouses and storage rates.
Wabash v. Illinois () limited state regulation of interstate railroads, citing federal commerce power; states could not regulate interstate railroads.
McCrary Bill () proposed federal railroad regulation but failed; Senate formed Cohen Committee to study regulation, leading to the Interstate Commerce Act (ICA) of .
ICA: signed by President Grover Cleveland; required railroads to publish rate schedules; rates had to be reasonable and just; prohibited discriminatory pricing; enforcement vested in the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC).
ICC comprised five presidential appointees; could not set rates directly; had to prove reasonableness in court; courts often favored big business.
Railroad overexpansion and speculation contributed to financial panics in the late 19th century; Panic of followed the Philadelphia and Reading Railroad bankruptcy; JP Morgan intervened to reorganize and stabilize railroads from to .
Social Darwinism
Laissez-faire advocates argued government should stay out of business; success came from natural competition.
Survival of the fittest extended from biology to society; the most fit prospered as power and wealth.
Herbert Spencer argued that social evolution results from competition; government interference would hinder natural development (book: Social Statics).
William Graham Sumner, Yale professor, championed freedom to compete and self-interest; used religious language to support laissez-faire.
These ideas became influential in the late – and shaped debates over regulation vs. laissez-faire.