Personality Assessment Notes
Chapter 8: Personality Assessment
Objective Personality Measures
Definition: Involve administering a standard set of questions/statements with fixed response options.
Advantages:
Economical
Scoring and administration are simple and objective
Reliable
Disadvantages:
Items may not accurately characterize respondents' behaviors
Mixtures of behavioral, cognitive, and emotional items can exist
Transparent questions may lead to faking by respondents
Forced-choice format limits elaboration in responses
Methods for Constructing Objective Tests
Content Validation:
Requires defining relevant aspects of the variable being measured.
Involves consulting experts, using judges for item relevance, and employing psychometric analyses to evaluate items.
Empirical Criterion Keying:
Items created to measure traits are tested on groups with and without the characteristic. Items that discriminate between groups are selected.
Example: MMPI test items are validated based on responses indicative of psychopathy.
Factor Analysis:
Purifies scales to reflect basic dimensions of personality.
EFA: Reduces items to core traits without theoretical basis.
CFA: Validates a hypothesized factor structure based on theory.
Construct Validity Approach:
Theory-driven and involves continuous refinement based on empirical feedback.
Major Objective Personality Measures Available to Clinical Psychologists
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)
Purpose: Identify psychiatric diagnoses.
Developers: Starke R. Hathaway and J.C. McKinley.
Versions:
Original MMPI: 550 items (true/false/cannot say)
MMPI-2: 567 items, restandardized for a wider age range (13+ years).
Key Scales:
Scale 1: Hypochondriasis (Hs) - concern with bodily symptoms
Scale 2: Depression (D) - feelings of hopelessness
Scale 3: Hysteria (Hy) - conversion of conflict into physical issues
Scale 4: Psychopathic Deviate (Pd) - social deviance
Scale 5: Masculinity/Femininity (Mf) - gender role perceptions
Scale 6: Paranoia (Pa) - suspiciousness
Scale 7: Psychasthenia (Pt) - OCD-like symptoms
Scale 8: Schizophrenia (Sc) - unusual thoughts and withdrawal
Scale 9: Hypomania (Ma) - overactivity
Scale 0: Social Introversion (Si) - withdrawal from social situations.
Validity Scales
Four Original Validity Scales:
Cannot Say Scale: Items left unanswered
Infrequency Scale (F): Suggests deviant responding
Defensiveness Scale (K): Identifies faking good
Lie Scale (L): Detects positive self-presentation attempts.
Three New Validity Scales:
TRIN Scale: Detects inconsistent true responses.
VRIN Scale: Identifies random responses.
Fb Scale: Evaluates back-page responding.
MMPI Interpretation
Profile Analysis: Looks at patterns of scores, not just elevated scores.
Content-Based Interpretation: Specific item responses reveal deeper fears and concerns.
NEO-PI-R
Purpose: Comprehensive assessment of normal adult personality based on Big Five traits (McCrae and Costa).
Structure: 240 questions, five domains, thirty facets.
Domains:
Neuroticism: Psychological distress traits
Extraversion: Engagement with social world
Openness to Experience: Appreciation for variety
Agreeableness: Compassionate interactions
Conscientiousness: Organization and responsibility
Clinical Applications: Assessed for personality disorders and normal traits.
Limitations:
Lack of validity items for response styles
Clinical usage needs further research
Projective Techniques and Their Issues
Overview: Based on Freudian theories, examines behavior in ambiguous situations.
General Characteristics:
Unstructured stimulus revealing personal dispositions
Indirect method with varied interpretation
Key Tests:
Rorschach Inkblot Test: Ten inkblot cards; responses scored by location, content, and determinants.
Thematic Apperception Test (TAT): Cards elicit storytelling to infer personality traits.
Rotter Incomplete Sentence Blank: Sentence completions scored for adjustment levels.
Incremental Validity and Utility
Definition: The usefulness of assessments in predicting outcomes beyond what is already known.
Example of Clinical Application: Identifying learning delays in students via comparative methods.
Ethical Considerations in Testing
Protections: Psychologists should use competent methodologies with proper ethical standards.
Privacy Issues: Informed consent and relevance of test purposes to evaluations.
Confidentiality Concerns: Safeguarding test result privacy amidst growing data systems.
Discrimination: Awareness of how tests may disadvantage minorities or certain groups.
Test Bias: Recognizing and addressing biases in predictive accuracy across different demographic groups.
Computer-Based Assessment: Challenges in ensuring accurate interpretations from software-generated results.