Ethics of Enhancement
Enhancement and Its Ethical Considerations
Understanding Enhancement
- Definition: Enhancement is often defined as to advance, augment, elevate, heighten, or increase the worth or value of something.
- Contextualizing Enhancement: We must consider what is being enhanced and the moral implications involved.
- Example: Enhancing the fear of prisoners through maltreatment is ethically wrong.
Examples of Biomedical Enhancement
- Use Cases:
- Parents using biosynthetic human growth hormone (hGH) for children.
- Musicians using beta blockers to manage performance anxiety.
- Athletes employing anabolic steroids for strength.
- Caffeine as a stimulant among writers.
- Testosterone: An example of a hormone used in enhancement contexts, particularly in sports. The complexity of its use is highlighted in the context of fairness in athletics.
The Distinction Between Therapy and Enhancement
- Therapy vs. Enhancement:
- Therapy improves health; enhancement is for improvement beyond what is deemed medically necessary.
- This distinction is often blurred, as certain medical treatments can be considered enhancements.
- Example: Vaccines enhance immune function, thus blurring the line between therapy and enhancement.
- Challenges in Defining Enhancement:
- All therapy can be seen as a form of enhancement, complicating clear definitions.
- Treatment modalities like hGH prescriptions for children can evoke ethical dilemmas between therapeutic needs and enhancement desires.
Ethical Arguments for Enhancement
- Incoherency Argument:
- Claims no rational basis exists for distinguishing between acceptable and non-acceptable means of enhancement.
- Line-Drawing Problem:
- Difficulty in determining arbitrary boundaries between acceptable and unacceptable techniques.
- Argument from Liberty:
- Individuals should have the freedom to enhance themselves as they see fit, promoting personal autonomy.
- Resistance is Futile Claim:
- Suggests that enhancement is inevitable; attempts to suppress it are ultimately ineffective.
- Heroic-Romantic-Promethean Assertion:
- Advocates that self-design is an inherent human pursuit, deserving of consideration.
Human Nature and Ethical Concerns
- Can Human Nature Guide Enhancement Ethics?:
- Human nature may offer both a framework and a limitation in determining enhancement ethics.
- Three perspectives:
- Raw Material View: Human nature as a pliable entity for enhancement.
- Contours of the Given: Our nature exhibits certain limits that can inform ethical boundaries.
- Normative Guide: A vision that what is inherently good in human nature should direct enhancement efforts.
- Concerns About Enhancement:
- Possible undermining of innate gifts, leading to a loss of humility and solidarity.
- Emergence of a culture that focuses excessively on control over innate characteristics, yielding potential tyranny in parenting decisions.
Social and Moral Implications of Enhancement
- Complicity with Unjust Norms:
- Enhancements can reinforce societal standards, leading to negative societal impacts (e.g., cosmetic surgery reinforcing youth and beauty standards).
- Younger Generations and Parental Influence:
- Parents may unintentionally establish unrealistic standards for their children through enhancement efforts.
- Resource Allocation:
- Enhancement interventions must be evaluated for their broader societal value and potential waste of resources.
Conclusion: Navigating the Ethics of Enhancement
- Diversity of Enhancements: Recognizes the various manifestations and moral implications associated with enhancement, emphasizing no singular ethical principle.
- Call for a Conceptual Map: Necessitates a nuanced understanding of goods, dangers, and social context regarding each enhancement effort, promoting consideration for the implications of enhancements on human flourishing.