2.3 state auth
Overview of State Authority and Demographic Impacts
Introduction to State Authority Gaps
The discussion focuses on the prevalence and measurement of state authority across different regions and time periods, utilizing census data error rates, specifically the Myers Index.
Case Studies in State Authority
Île-de-France Example (1982)
Figure 1.2 Analysis
Two sharp discontinuities in the age distribution observed:
Discontinuity (ages 60–65): Represents the loss of young men due to World War II.
Men in their 20s during the war who would have been in their 60s by 1982.
Discontinuity (around age 37): Reflects the postwar baby boom; individuals born in 1945 reaching late 30s to early 40s in 1982.
Myers Index for Île-de-France: 0.64, indicating minimal age inaccuracy and high degree of state authority.
Suggests that existing curves or their discontinuities are not indicators of weak statehood, but rather the noise or dispersion around the distribution implies weaknesses.
Comparative Analysis of State Authority Across Regions
Spatial Extent of State Authority
Proposes examining spatial patterns in state authority among different countries over time.
Figures 1.3 and 1.4 show state weakness in the Asia-Pacific (1980-89) and Africa (2000-2009) regions measured by census data accuracy (Myers scores).
Measurement of State Weakness:
Greater inaccuracy signifies higher state weakness.
Countries with missing data depicted in white, and logged Myers scores used to manage cross-country skew.
Observations from Figures
Vast differences in state authority levels observed between countries.
Example countries:
India identified as having worse levels of state authority than China.
Ethiopia noted to have weaker state authority compared to South Africa.
Localized Patterns within Countries
Myers Index’s Subnational Coverage:
Allows for examination of within-country governance patterns which broad cross-country comparisons might obscure.
Philippines (1960) as a Case Study:
Figure 1.5 illustrates state authority across provinces with darker areas indicating higher levels of state weakness.
Significant clusters of light-colored areas around Manila and other surrounding provinces.
Dark-colored areas in the south including Sulu and Basilan show low state authority.
The southern Mindanao region portrays particular difficulties due to geographic isolation from the main government.
State Authority Over Time
Temporal Variation of State Authority
Incomplete state consolidation is a persistent issue not limited to specific geopolitical periods.
Turkey Case Studies:
Figure 1.6 shows state authority snapshots in Turkey (1975, 1985, 1990, and 2000) indicating progress in state authority.
Uneven state authority persists in southeastern Turkey despite overall improvements.
Indonesia’s Governance Evolution (1971-2010):
Figure 1.7 measures state weakness over time with significant improvements from 1971 (high weakness) to 2010 (expanded governance across the archipelago).
Unlike Turkey, Indonesia managed to overcome challenges tied to its geographic diversity.
Human Consequences of Incomplete State Authority
Importance of Governmental Authority:
Lack of government authority directly correlates with negative human welfare outcomes in several domains: security, health, and education.
Individuals in ungoverned spaces experience the lack of state authority as a tangible impact on their day-to-day lives.
State's Monopoly of Force:
Fundamental to a state’s identity.
States are expected to maintain order by monopolizing the use of force.
The absence of this monopoly leads to challenges such as competing authorities, highlighting state inefficacy.
Examples:
1990s Kashmir violence as a rival claims to authority.
East African corridor (from Somalia through Mozambique) plagued by conflicts.
Violent Contestation of Authority:
Areas of incomplete governance often become sites of conflict between state and non-state actors, posing dangers to civilians caught in violence.