Module 2 Notes: Biologically Primary vs Biologically Secondary Knowledge
Biologically Primary vs Biologically Secondary Knowledge
- Module focus: Geary’s theory; explain, model, and check for understanding; justify fully guided instruction; corrective feedback; concept development and skill development.
- Key distinction: not all knowledge is equal; biologically primary vs biologically secondary knowledge.
Biologically Primary Knowledge
- Definition: evolved to learn; naturally acquired; universal across humans.
- How learned: through interaction with others and environment; no explicit instruction needed.
- Examples: speaking and social communication; facial recognition; navigating the local area; solving problems.
- Why it exists: aids survival and social coordination (e.g., warning signals, finding exits, cooperation).
- Cognitive load theory note: irrelevant for biologically primary knowledge; working memory constraints do not govern mastery of these skills.
- Folk knowledge: general understandings about people, behavior, plants/animals; learned through everyday life.
Biologically Secondary Knowledge
- Definition: not evolved to learn automatically; requires deliberate instruction.
- How learned: explicit teaching; slower, effortful, less reliable without guidance.
- Examples: reading, writing, mathematics, scientific concepts, complex academic ideas.
- Acquisition methods: borrowing and reorganising from others; trial and error; can take long time if unguided.
- Schools’ role: essential for teaching this type of knowledge needed to navigate the modern world.
- Why valuable: extends beyond immediate intuition; supports civilization and cumulative knowledge (standing on the shoulders of giants).
Quick Classification Activity (from transcript)
- Navigating the local area: Primary
- Driving a car: Secondary
- Writing your name: Secondary
- Singing nursery rhymes: Primary
- Training for a marathon: Secondary
- Climbing a fence: Primary
Why Secondary Knowledge Matters for Civilization
- Folk knowledge vs explicit knowledge: folk knowledge is intuitive but limited; explicit knowledge accelerates and refines understanding.
- Imagination and progress: explicit, accumulated knowledge enables breakthroughs beyond immediate intuitions.
How Biologically Secondary Knowledge Is Acquired
- Borrowing and reorganising: listen to others and adapt their explanations.
- Trial and error: can work but is slow and unreliable.
- Explicit instruction is the reason schools exist for this knowledge.
Explicit Instruction vs Guided Instruction
- Key question: Does explicit instruction interfere with students’ construction of knowledge?
- Common belief in schools: explicit instruction can be seen as limiting—but evidence and pedagogy suggest:
- Explicit instruction provides a solid foundation for students to build upon.
- Students still actively construct their own knowledge after receiving guidance.
- Modelling, guided practice, and subsequent independent tasks foster higher-order thinking.
- Classroom stance (from transcript):
- A majority view: explicit instruction does not prevent construction of knowledge; it supports it when followed by active application and generation.
- Without some explicit guidance, learning secondary knowledge can be daunting.
Teaching Implications
- For biologically primary knowledge: natural acquisition through exposure and social interaction is often sufficient.
- For biologically secondary knowledge: teach explicitly and scaffolded; then provide opportunities to apply, reason, and create beyond the given information.
- Use a balanced approach: explicit instruction plus opportunities for students to generate, question, and extend understanding.