Punishments - 1700-1900
End of the Bloody code
Ideas
1770, Sir William Meredith complained to parliament - too harsh
Campaign started by Mackintosh and sir Samuel Romily
1808 - no death penalty for pick-pocketting
1822-1840 Peel reduced hanging crimes from 200-5
public hanging ended in 1868
Didn’t work
people got the day ff work to see executions - factories closed
people made executions a day out - laugh and drink
increase risk of protest riots
Juries
took pity on people - especially children
1700’s 40% of convicts were hung, by 1800 10%
juries though it was unfair
more likely for crime to be committed if can get away with it
Transportation
started in 1717 as an alternative punishment to the Bloody Code
162,000 convicts were transported to Australia
including Tolpuddle Martyrs, Luddites, Chartists, and Irish Nationalists
convicts worked building roads, bridges or on farms
if there was good work, convicts could get a ‘ticket to leave’
but any stayed as it was better than the crime and poverty in England
ended in 1857
How Successful
less harsh than death penalty - more likely to convict
but still harsh enough to be a deterrent - if committed further crimes flogged / more rural settlements
reduce crime in Britain - remove criminals
claim Australia as British - but settlers didn’t want convict to be left - protests
reform criminals through hard work - only get basic needs if do good work
Why it Ended
wrong to offer convicts new life in Australia while some paid to go
no effect on crime rate
prisons were becoming bigger and more popular
Australians began to object that criminals were being left
Problems with Prisons
staff - short staffed meant serious criminals had to mix with debtors
prisoners - serious criminals were teaching petty criminals had to preform serious crimes
accommodation - Gaols were small rooms, with possibly no windows - hulks were emergancy after end of transportation
health - disease spread quickly
Changes in Prisons
John Howard
fresh water
hygienic conditions
prison doctor
provide food
don’t have to pay fees for essentials
regular visits from churchmen
occupied by hard work
Elizabeth Fry
rule for women to obey in prison
female wardens, 1823
clothes and furniture
schools for women and children
regular work
inspectors supervised conditions,1835
Brixton prison solely for women, 1853
Children
Pankhurst prison solely for young offenders, 1838
reformatory schools, 1850
1870 Education Act - children under 10 had to be schooled
1899children couldn’t be in the same prison as an adult
How far they were revolutionised
Positive | Negative | |
Old prison system |
| |
Gaols Act, 1823 |
| |
Separate Act, 1830’s |
|
|
Silent System, 1860’s |
|
|
Why they changed
fear of crime - media made it worse than actually was
end of Bloody code - needed alternative punishments
end of transportation - benefitting more than punishing
Social reformers - John Howard, Elizabeth Fry
Humanitarianism - treat people equally
Government actions - Peel
Problems with separate system - mental problems
Pentonville Prison
small cell for each individual prisoner
thick walls
isolated during day
up to 23 hours in cell
harsh labour - up to 12h a day
deliberately bland food
wooden beds
opportunities for improvement
self-reflection
not influenced by other criminals
deter people from committing crimes
retribution - have to ‘pay’ for the behaviour
mental illnesses
high suicide rate
22 went mad, 26 nervous breakdowns, 3 suicides
Dates Involving in Changing Prisons
1896 - mentally ill prisoners got treatment
1900 - Separate system declining
1902 - no pointless tasks
1907 - probation officers to check offenders outside prison
1922 - no solitary confinement
1922 - better food and conditions
1933 - first Open Prison