Dr. Wigley discusses minimally invasive bunion surgery (MIS Bunion).
About Dr. Wigley
Born and raised in Memphis, Tennessee.
Undergrad at Dillard University in New Orleans.
Went to Barry University in South Florida.
Completed surgical residency at Palmetto General Hospital.
Private practice focusing on rear foot, forefoot, soft tissue mass, and wound care initially.
Found a niche in minimally invasive bunion surgery in South Florida.
Overview of MIS Bunion
The talk will cover the techniques, benefits, and outcomes of the Minnow Vasor Bunion procedure.
It's an introductory overview for various skill levels.
Bunion Overview (Hallux Valgus)
Number one foot deformity globally.
Involves the big toe shifting towards the second digit.
Causes discomfort, pain, and swelling, especially with certain shoes.
Fixation techniques vary from no fixation to screws.
The goal is to perfect bunion correction, with minimally invasive approaches being preferred due to less downtime and smaller scars.
Hallux Valgus Details
Common deformity of the big toe joint.
Symptoms include pain, redness, swelling, and shoe-wearing difficulties.
Causes often include genetics, improper footwear, and inflammatory conditions such as arthritis.
Traditional Bunionectomy vs. Minimally Invasive Surgery
Dr. Wigley has moved away from traditional open incisions for about 95% of bunion cases.
Recovery Time: MIS allows patients to return to comfortable shoe gear in 3-4 weeks versus 6-8 weeks with traditional methods.
Scarring: MIS results in smaller, less visible scars, which is a significant concern for patients in South Florida.
The primary goal of surgery is to alleviate pain and improve mobility.
Surgical correction is considered the only effective method for bunion correction.
Dr. Wigley has performed over 400 bunion surgeries in 11 years.
Patient Experiences with Traditional Procedures
Persistent swelling lasting almost a year.
Failed recovery periods.
Long healing times that restrict activity.
Reluctance to undergo surgery on the other foot in bilateral cases.
Minimally Invasive Approach Details
Incision Size: Very small incisions (1-2 millimeters) compared to 4-6 inches with traditional methods.
Tool Used: 2.2 Shannon burr.
Cosmetic Outcome: Improved due to minimal scarring.
Trauma: Less tissue disruption, involving only micro-invasive techniques.
Recovery: Faster recovery times due to reduced tissue trauma.
MIS Benefits
Smaller incision reduces tissue trauma, allowing for quicker recovery.
Patients appreciate faster recovery, often scheduling surgery before holidays for extended recovery time.
Most patients can return to some type of shoe gear within 21-28 days.
Indications for MIS
Mild to moderate bunions.
Early-stage bunions without significant disease progression.
MIS can stabilize hypermobile first rays by shifting the metatarsal component to a desired position.
Realistic patient expectations and commitment to postoperative protocol are essential.
Surgical Techniques
Patient Positioning: Supine with foot hanging off the bed to allow use of mini C-arm or C-arm apparatus without obstructions.
Bur Osteotomy: Using a 2.2 Shannon burr.
First Metatarsal Surgery: Placing surgery in the medullary canal to shift about 90% of the metatarsal head for correction.
Fixation: Moving from K-wires to cortical and cancellous screws for compression, transversing the base of the first metatarsal towards the lateral sesamoid.
The choice of fixation method depends on surgeon preference.
Postoperative Period
Immediate weight-bearing on the third day with a postoperative shoe is common.
Micromotion aids bone callus formation and reduces swelling.
Less swelling reduces complications.
The choice between a surgical boot and a cam walker depends on patient compliance.
Proper wound care and weekly check-ups for the first 3-4 weeks, followed by a final follow-up at week 6 or 7.
Transition to normal tennis shoes for comfort around week four, with expected dorsiflexion of the first metatarsal.
Case Examples
Example of minimally invasive surgery correcting a moderate bunion (22-26 degrees) to a near-zero degree intermetatarsal angle.
Early career techniques involved landing two parallel screws.
Incision healed in about two weeks with minimal swelling.
Recapping Benefits of MIS
Pain reduction
Faster recovery time
High patient satisfaction leading to referrals
Cosmetically appealing results due to invisible scars can cause jealousy among those with traditional bunionectomy scars
Outcomes
Evidence based on randomized control studies, retrospective analyses, and meta-analyses, with studies being relatively recent (within the last seven years).
Dr. Wigley uses MIS for 90-95% of bunion surgeries due to the demographics he serves.
Overcoming the Learning Curve
Mastery requires dedicated training and practice.
Practicing dexterity using blocks to perfect cuts can be beneficial.
Fluoroscopy is essential for precision, with a skilled technician being crucial.
Personal Methods
Landing two screws parallel to each other, aiming for the lateral sesamoid.
Achieving nearly 100% shifts.
Patients are very satisfied with the outcomes.
Q&A Section
Screw Diameters and Lengths:
Shooting from the base of the first metatarsal to the lateral sesamoid:
54mm screw from the base of the first with correction to the lateral sesamoid.
For a traditional two-screw technique, use 44 mm to 36 mm screws depending on the parallel offset.
Lateral screw is usually 44mm, with a 4mm to 6mm decrease from the medial screw.
Using a 4.0 diameter on nearly all screws, rarely using a 3.0.
Cost Difference (Open vs. MIS):
MIS uses fewer instruments and materials.
Savings come from the time spent in the operating room; shorter procedures reduce costs for anesthesia and supplies.
Patient Selection for MIS:
Surgeon discretion is key based on patient compliance and underlying mental elements.
Comorbidities, psychiatric clearances, and potential non-adherence to instructions must be considered.
Intermetatarsal Angle Cut Off:
Up until recently, anything in Lapidus territory was a cutoff, requiring a first metatarsal uniform fusion.
Now, Dr. Wigley is using a shift to unlock severe metatarsal joints, avoiding the need for fusion.
Compression in MIS Implants:
There's no definitive evidence between compression versus non-compressive implants.
AccuTrack screws have a conical depression, allowing for necessary correction that Herbert screws don't, which can lead to blowouts.
Tool for Pushing Capital Fragment Laterally:
Freehand freer down the metrical canal for leverage.
Mosquito hemostat down the medullary canal for shifting.
Frequency of Aiken Alongside Lateral Osteotomy:
Around 15%. Releasing the lateral capsule shifts the toe enough to avoid needing an Aiken.
Jig System Recommendation for Young Surgeons:
Yes, to take advantage of readily available technology.
Learning Curve for Freehand MIS:
Around the seventh or eighth procedure, one gains a better feel for the technique.
Rep Advice for Switching from Herbert to Accutrack Screws:
Highlight the need for a smaller incision with Accutrack.
Point out the potential for wall blowout with Herbert screws.
Emphasize that Accutrack’s conical shape decreases stress rising and blowback.
Opinion on 3D Printed Patient-Specific Devices
Cost is a factor relative to time and patient population.
Use of Parallel Wire Guide
There's a place for them. It's not slim enough right now.
Final Thoughts:
Be fearless and embrace the MIS world.
It is stable and results in fewer headaches long term.