The Ground Not Given
Agriculture and Colonization
Agriculture serves as a justification for colonization in the United States.
Emphasizes the illegibility of land sociality and the epistemologies of conquest.
Latin roots of English terms:
Colonia: settlement, farm
Colonus: settler, farmer
Colere: cultivate, inhabit
Prosperity for some has meant:
Displacement of Indigenous peoples
Abduction and enslavement of African peoples
Indenture, forced labor, migration
Historical Context
Historical foundations of agriculture as dispossessive practices continue into the present.
Agriculture's significance for capitalism evolves but remains crucial despite trends in finance and technology.
Examines the interplay of property, agriculture, and racial capitalism in the context of dispossession in the US.
Dispossession and Racial Capitalism
Focus on class action lawsuits from African American and Native American farmers against the USDA for discrimination.
USDA's loan programs historically favored white male farmers.
Lawsuits reveal entrenched economic disparities and racial discrimination:
USDA's Farmers Home Administration: served white farmers primarily, ignored complaints from farmers of color.
Antidiscrimination Challenges
Antidiscrimination doctrine insufficient in addressing complex social hierarchies:
Discrimination as a means of reinforcing prevailing economic orders.
Legal focus on individualized acts obscures systemic issues of racial capitalism and dispossession.
Dispossession and Land
Discusses David Harvey's concept of "accumulation by dispossession" and critiques its limitations.
Robert Nichols argues for a clearer relationship between land, labor, and dispossession:
Land as dynamic, connected to labor, not solely an object of property.
Colonization and Property
Early agricultural colonization intertwined with capitalist conceptions of property transformation.
The historical association between land ownership and agricultural improvement:
John Locke's view: land tilled as rightful property.
Colonization justified through the moral and economic rationale of agriculture.
Impact of Allotment Policies
The Dawes Severalty Act (1887) aimed to individualize Native lands, parallel to the goal of assimilation:
Resulted in significant land loss (from 138 million acres to 52 million acres by 1934).
Shift from communal land to individual ownership deepened colonial control and undermined Native sovereignty.
Racial Taxonomies and Land Ownership
Racialization plays a central role in contemporary land rights and property law:
Policies such as the Dawes Act were enmeshed with racial categorizations.
Controversies over tribal citizenship were amplified post-Emancipation.
Legacies of Displacement and Migration
The interconnections between agricultural production and racialized labor practices:
Increase in agricultural mechanization led to the outmigration of Black laborers.
1900s: Extensive Black migration to urban areas in search of better opportunities amidst oppression.
USDA's Role and Subsequent Settlements
Continued discrimination within USDA programming leading to systemic land dispossession:
Class action lawsuits showcase racial disparities within federal aid.
Significant settlements like Pigford (1999) addressed abuses by the USDA.
Challenges in achieving racial equity in agricultural support continue to resonate with historical injustices.
Indigenous Agriculture Today
Ongoing struggles for Native sovereignty in the context of agricultural production.
Environmental exploitation through agriculture, such as the Garrison Dam project, intensified dispossession.
Need to acknowledge the connection between land dispossession and racial capitalism when discussing Indigenous agricultural sovereignty.
Conclusion: The Not Given
Emphasizes the complex relationship between land, labor, and identity, and how historical contexts shape current agricultural policies.
Calls for understanding and dismantling the legacies of dispossession and the interests they serve.