Lecture 3: Research in Psychology
Online quiz
10%
Sunday 23 February 7 am - 10 pm
20 multiple choice questions in 30 minutes
2 attempts → higher mark counts
randomised questions
content from week 1-3
questions from chapters in the textbook
able to go backwards
will close automatically after 30 minutes
closed book
How do psychologists know what they know?
research
Resguish what is working and what is not as well as how to improve
Identify innovative solution each skill are a critical skill employers seek as they give access to
understand what is legitimate knowledge you can trust
distind to personal and professional problems and problems humans are facing
Fact
something that can be checked and backed up by evidence
Opinion
something based on a belief that is not based in evidence
Why is it important to distinguish fiction?
bias
myths
truth and honesty
What is evidence?
data supporting a theory
repeated results in experiments
Scientific research
no universal agreement of what it is as it has changed over time
1500 french word recherche
to search, seek
1400 Latin scientifica
making knowledge, to be distinguished
systematic exploration of reality to discover and interpret information to advance knowledge and deepen our understanding of a topic or issue
reliaable and techable knowledge
Creation of new knowledge
the use of existing knowledge in ne and creative way to generate new concepts ‘
including synthesis and analysis of previous research ‘
more valid perspective
have a sound basis in logic or fact
applying new knowledge to solve human problems
expanding our perspective
imagination - Einstein
2 main research approaches
Quantitative
Qualitative
each research strategy is based on different assumptions or perspectives about the nature of the world and knowledge
what constitutes scientific research
which is appropriate
which is a valued perspective
Ontology
nature of the world
what exists/real?
lens
where researchers look for explanations and what kind of questions they ask
Epistemology
nature of knowledge
what do we know about being and reality
what can we know about self and the world
what is valid knowledge i.e. evidence
Positivism
collapse of the objectivist worldview (positivism) that somained the modern era
Constructions
emerging in its place
see all information and all stories as human creations
learning about such things continually re examining beliefs about beliefs becomes the most important learning task
Quantitative
Positivism
statistics
predominant
emerged in response to triumphant advances of natural science
Ontology
ultimate singular truth
reality is an objective reflection of the truth
Epistemology
search for the truth
objective reflection
universal laws within peoples mind (internal processes
people separated and isolated
representative of reality
discovered
stable
ahistorical and acultural
passively described by language
objective and neutral
Research
discovering universal and casual laws
internal states and processes
Deduction and topdown confirmatory
testing hypotheses
reduction to variables conceptulise and quantify
empirical laboratory methods
researcher seperate
focus individuals
test theories
data
analysis
methods
experiments
correlational
survey
Qualitative
Constructionism
new world view
emerged end of the 20th century
advances in quantam physics and mechanisd
challenged empricists assumptions
critiques from social psychologists and marginalised groups about and practical applicability and relevance of knowledge produced
Ontology
reality is constructed by human interaction
people actively interpret information based on individual historically developed and cultural specific experiences
many different realities
Epistemology
understanding the meaning people assign to their experiences
multiple and relative truths
subjective = constructed
unkowable directly
mental processes revealed within process of interaction
interaction with environment
invented
changes
historical and cultural
actively constructed through language
shaped by interactions serves interest groups
Research
understanding meaning people assign to experience
interactions between people, behaviour, stories and talk
induction, interactive and bottom-up
exploring interpretations
complexity
methods in real life setting and interaction
researcher interacts
interrelations between people and society
develop theories
data
words
actions
analysis
interpretation
methods
in depth interviews
observations in real life
Induction
systematically observe and inquire what is going on in a situation
systematically identify patterns and relationships
develop theories
Deduction
use already ecxsting scientific knowledge regarding a topic or issue
propose a testable explanation or theory for a phenomena
conduct a study ti test the hypothesis
draw conclusions
mixed methods
utilises both
qualitative research has been devalued largely missing from inquiry criticism of irrelevance
Research methods
quantitative
experiments
aim is explain cause and effect relationships to predict how people are behaving
manipulating small number of variables in controlling conditions
Hypothesis
predicting how variables are related
if x happens y will happen
measurement → operational definition
observable behaviour that can be measured
Manipulating X to see whether Y changes
Independent Variable
what will cause change in DV
manipulated
Dependent Variable
measurable
What effect is caused by IV
Cofounding or extraneous variables
variables that may cause DV
aims to identify relationships between two or more variables
requires numbers = measurements
observations, case studies or surveys
measures extent to which two or more variables are related
predict one another
strength of relationship
zero correlation
no or little relationship between variables
correlation
relationship between variables
can be positive or negative
strength of relationship
the closer dots to line = the stronger relationship
Surveys
quick way to collect lots of information about current state of
opinions/attitudes
perspectives
experiences
behaviour
asking people using questionnaires
mail and phone
online
face to face
asking smaller subset of population = sample
representative of population
sampling errors or biases = sample differs from population results invalid
Questions
closed questions
open ended
carefully worded → wording effect due to word associations
Response bias
way participants feel they are expected to answer or in systematic ways rather than stating actual ways
acquiescent RB → agree
socially desirable RB → acceptable ways
Illusory superiority → better than average
Response rate
varies 30-50% → less commonly
Experiments
Strength
Objective
manipulation of variables
establish cause and effect relationships
Limitations
Superficial, artificial and relevance issues
some complex phenomena cannot be tested
Correlational studies
Strength
Information on many people in one time
Allows quantification of variables relationship between
allows formulating of hypothesis
Limitations
Only associational RS
Reliability and validity self report issues
Superficial and artificial
Qualitative