*Somatics symptoms and DID
Chapter 16: Psychological Disorders
Somatic Symptom Disorders (formerly somatoform disorders)
Definition: Physical complaints suggesting a medical problem without a biological cause.
Symptoms are not intentionally produced by individuals.
Individuals experience significant preoccupation or anxiety about their health or physical sensations.
This category includes conditions formerly known as hypochondriasis, which is now split in DSM-5 into:
Illness Anxiety Disorder
Somatic Symptom Disorder
Types of Somatic Symptom Disorders:
Pain Disorder:
Characterized by intense pain that is disproportionate to any medical condition present.
The pain is experienced as real but cannot be explained by any physical injury or medical condition.
Functional Neurological Symptom Disorder (Conversion Disorder):
Involves neurological symptoms such as paralysis, blindness, or loss of sensation without any identifiable physical cause.
The brains and nerves of the patient remain intact.
Example of a symptom: Glove Anaesthesia - loss of sensation below the wrist which is anatomically impossible.
Patients often exhibit belle indifference, which is a calm indifference to their symptoms.
Prevalence & Case Studies:
Frequency: Rare in the general population, approximately 3 in 1000; more common during war or experienced trauma.
Up to 25% of hospital patients may present some functional neurological symptoms.
Notable case: Psychogenic blindness observed in Cambodian refugees (Cooke, 1991) - the eyes respond normally, yet the brain blocks visual input related to trauma.
Causal Factors:
Psychodynamic:
Freud posited that symptoms symbolize unresolved unconscious conflicts.
Example: Paralysis may occur after repressed anger directed towards a parent.
Biological:
Factors such as reduced pituitary gland volume and possible genetic vulnerabilities.
Environmental:
Learned attention and sympathy reinforce a habitual focus on bodily sensations.
Cultural:
Such disorders may be more prevalent in cultures where emotional discussion is discouraged.
Psychological:
Traits include heightened sensitivity to bodily sensations and poor coping skills when faced with stress.
Dissociative Disorders
Definition: A breakdown in the integration of memory, identity, and consciousness.
Purpose: These disorders often manifest as a psychological escape from stress or traumatic experiences.
Major Types of Dissociative Disorders:
Dissociative Amnesia:
Features a sudden, selective loss of memory typically following stress or trauma.
Other cognitive abilities, such as language and motor skills, remain intact.
Dissociative Fugue:
A rare subtype of amnesia characterized by sudden travel and the adoption of a new identity.
Duration can range from hours to years; the individual may lack awareness of their original identity.
Usually triggered by severe stress or trauma.
Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID):
Formerly known as Multiple Personality Disorder.
Involves two or more distinct personalities (commonly referred to as "alters") coexisting within a single individual.
Each alter may possess different memories, behaviors, and even physiological traits such as variations in voice, allergies, handedness, and menstrual cycles.
Often arises following severe trauma or abuse during childhood.
Trauma-Dissociation Theory:
Proposed by Frank Putnam in 1989, this theory suggests:
DID develops as a coping mechanism for enduring unbearable trauma, especially from childhood abuse.
The child dissociates, creating alternate identities to endure and manage the trauma and accompanying pain.
Dissociation operates similarly to self-hypnosis, allowing the individual to detach from the traumatic experience.
Protective identities are maintained separate from the host personality to prevent re-experiencing the trauma.
Support for this theory: Approximately 97% of patients diagnosed with DID report experiencing severe abuse in their early years.
Critique of DID Validity:
Controversial Diagnosis:
Critics suggest that DID could be a condition developed through therapist suggestion or hypnosis.
The diagnosis was rare prior to 1970, with about 100 cases worldwide, but surged as public awareness increased (notably through media representations like the case of Sybil).
Some theorists consider DID to be merely a form of role-playing or a social construction rather than a genuine disorder.
Allegations of therapists implanting false memories, leading to lawsuits against therapists for inducing DID through suggestion.
Scientific Debate:
Support for DID:
Research shows distinct physiological differences (such as EEG readings, brain activation, and eye muscle movements) between alters within DID patients.
Variations in visual cortex activity have been observed when subjects switch between personalities (Strasburger & Waldvogel, 2015).
Differences in voice spectral patterns recorded between alters (Putnam, 1984).
Criticism of Findings:
Many results are derived from case studies rather than being validated through controlled experiments.
Role-playing studies fail to replicate the same neurological differences shown in actual cases of DID.
Conclusion:
Current perspectives reveal mixed evidence regarding the authenticity of DID: some view it as a legitimate dissociative response to trauma, while others believe it to be behavior reinforced by social context.
Controversy Surrounding Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID)
A. Grounds for Criticism
Controversial Diagnosis:
Critics question the validity of DID, suggesting that it may not be an authentic disorder but rather a construct influenced by activities in therapeutic settings.
Argument that DID is created by therapists through suggestion techniques or hypnosis.
Prior to 1970, there were approximately 100 recorded cases of DID worldwide, but the number surged following media portrayals (e.g., the case of "Sybil").
Some critics propose that DID may function as a role-playing or social construction rather than a legitimate psychological disorder.
Additionally, there are claims that therapists may implant false memories in patients, leading to misdiagnoses.
Example cited: Associated Press report from 1997 highlighting instances of litigation against therapists for allegedly inducing DID through suggestive techniques.
B. Scientific Debate
Support for DID:
Research demonstrates distinct physiological differences among personality alters in individuals diagnosed with DID:
Specific EEG patterns.
Variation in brain activation levels.
Changes in eye muscle movement detected during personality switches.
Notable finding: Visual cortex activity alters when DID patients switch personalities (Strasburger & Waldvogel, 2015).
Voice spectral patterns reveal differences among alters (Putnam, 1984).
Criticism:
Many supporting findings originate from observational case studies rather than controlled experimental studies.
Role-playing research conducted has failed to consistently reproduce the neurological distinctions observed in DID patients.
C. Conclusion
The evidence surrounding DID remains mixed:
Some experts perceive DID as an authentic dissociative response to traumatic experiences.
Conversely, others interpret it as behavior that has been socially reinforced over time.