Detailed Study Notes on Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviour
Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviour
Course Introduction
Instructor: Dr. Victoria Scaife
Overview of topics: prosocial and antisocial behaviors, theories explaining these behaviors, and the empirical studies supporting them.
Course Structure
Part 1: Prosocial Behaviour
Review and Introduction
Perspectives on Prosocial Behaviour
Key Theories:
Evolutionary Perspective
Social Exchange Theory
Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis
Identifying Features of People and Situations
Helping in Emergencies: The Bystander Effect
Part 2: Antisocial Behaviour
Focus on Aggression
Factors Influencing Aggression:
Gender
Frustration, Displacement, & Catharsis
Priming
Climate
Media & Video Games
Methods to Reduce Aggression
Summary / Conclusion
Key Themes in Current Studies
In-depth analysis of theory and empirical evidence related to prosocial and antisocial behavior.
Critical evaluation:
Hierarchies among theoretical frameworks (higher-level thinking)
Evaluation of research methods and findings (lower-level thinking)
Emphasis on:
Big Themes
Debates
Distinctions in social psychology
Social psychology seeks to validate hypotheses with empirical data, considering:
Direction of effects
Conditions under which effects manifest
Reversibility of effects
Underlying reasons for observed effects
Understanding Prosocial Behaviour
Definition and Characteristics
Social behaviors that benefit individuals or society as a whole, facilitating societal functioning.
Involves:
Direct and indirect help to others
Cooperation
Conformance to social norms
Perspectives on Prosocial Behaviour
Evolutionary Perspective
Concept of natural selection favoring genes that promote individual survival.
Example: Kin Selection (helping those related by blood).
Social Exchange Theory
Altruism often rooted in self-interest; individuals seek to maximize rewards and minimize costs when helping others.
Cost-benefit analysis influences decisions to help.
Rewards:
Increases likelihood of future assistance
Relief from personal distress
Social approval
Costs:
Risk of harm or embarrassment
Time investment
Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis
Proposed by Batson (1991): Two distinct motives for aiding others:
Egoistic Motive: Desire to increase one’s own welfare
Altruistic Motive: Desire to improve another’s welfare, regardless of self-interest.
Empathy can lead to altruistic behavior.
Bystander Effect in Emergencies
The case study of Kitty Genovese highlights that the presence of others often leads to reduced likelihood of helping behaviors in emergencies.
Bystander Affect: More people present = less likely individuals are to help, confirmed across numerous studies (over 50 studies by Latane & Nida, 1981).
Cognitive Model (Latane & Darley, 1968): Stresses five steps to help:
Notice the emergency
Interpret the situation as an emergency
Assume responsibility
Have the appropriate skills
Provide help if conditions allow.
Diffusion of Responsibility: Individuals feel less compelled to take action when others are present, affecting their likelihood to assist.
Factors Influencing Prosocial Behaviour
Personal Traits: Empathy levels, altruism, personality traits (Davis, 1980).
Environmental Influences: Urban vs. rural settings, perceived similarity, and attractiveness of victims (beautiful victims).
Overview of Antisocial Behaviour
Definition and Characteristics
Behaviors intended to harm oneself, another person, or an object (Bjorkqvist & Niemela, 1992).
Essential elements:
Intent to harm, which distinguishes these actions from mere accidents.
Includes both verbal and physical forms, and can be directed towards oneself or objects.
Distinct from emotions like anger and attitudes such as hostility, as it emphasizes the behavioral intention.
Types of Aggression
Instrumental Aggression: Engaging in aggression as a means to an end (e.g., personal gain).
Hostile Aggression: Acts driven by emotions; aggression aimed to cause harm for its own sake.
Indirect/Relational Aggression: Non-physical forms (e.g., lies, gossip).
Factors Influencing Aggression
Gender Differences: Men tend to exhibit more violent behavior than women across various cultural contexts.
Biological Contributors: Genetic links to aggression, hormones like testosterone, and influence of specific brain regions.
Social Learning: Aggression can be learned through observing and imitating others (Bandura, 1971).
Environmental Effects: External factors including frustration, media exposure, and climate variations all play roles in aggressive behaviors.
Effective Strategies for Reducing Aggression
Development of self-control techniques
Implementation of cognitive-behavioral methods
Relaxation practices
Conclusion
Understanding the dynamics of prosocial and antisocial behaviors can influence societal interactions and interventions.
Essential Readings
Pfattheicher, S., Nielsen, Y.A., & Thielmann, I. (2022). Prosocial behavior and altruism: A review of concepts. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 124-129.
Kavussanu, M., & Al-Yaaribi (2021). Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviour in Sport. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 19(2), 179-202.
Anderson, C.A., & Bushman, B.J. (2002). Human Aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27-51.
Archer, J., & Coyne, S.M. (2005). An Integrated Review of Indirect Relational and Social Aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(3), 212-230.
Additional References
Further studies and analyses reinforce understandings of prosocial and antisocial behaviors within various contexts, including the impact of socioeconomic factors and intervention strategies to reduce antisocial behavior.