Capacity to Make a Will
Introduction to Capacity for Making a Will
Presenter: Jane from BrightLink Learning Limited.
Module Focus: CPQ advanced stage: Wills, Probate, and Private Client, Chapter 8 on capacity to make a will.
Key Concepts of Capacity in Will Making
Eligibility to Make a Will:
Must be over the age of 18.
Must be of sound mind and acting voluntarily.
Legal Frameworks:
Must comply with the Wills Act 1837 (as amended) and the Administration of Justice Act 1982.
Validity Requirements:
Sufficient capacity, necessary intention, and legal formalities must be met for a will to be valid.
If any requirement is unmet, the will is invalid, leading to intestacy rules or terms of previous valid wills.
Checklist for Assessing Testamentary Capacity
Practical Steps Include:
Assessing testamentary capacity.
Documenting urgent instructions and attendance notes.
Addressing earlier wills and any time limits.
Instructions taken remotely.
Requirements of Mental Capacity
Legal Criteria: Established in Banks and Goodfellow (1870), stating that:
Testamentary capacity includes understanding the nature of making a will and its implications, including:
Nature of the Act: The will affects distribution of assets posthumously.
Awareness of Assets: Must know the general extent of the estate.
Moral Claims: Awareness of any moral obligations towards potential beneficiaries, even if they are not included in the will.
Mental Disturbance: No mental disorder that distorts perception or judgment should exist.
The Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA)
Application of MCA 2005:
Defines how incapacity affects decisions regarding personal affairs.
Legal practitioners must assess clients’ capacities when giving instructions for wills.
Assessment of Capacity:
Determine if the client can understand information, retain it, weigh their options, and communicate decisions.
Medical Opinion: Recommended when capacity is uncertain, especially in:
Age over 80.
Significant changes to existing wills, especially exclusion of beneficiaries.
Communication difficulties due to medical conditions.
Burden of Proof and Legal Authority
Burden of Proof: Resides with the person propounding the will to prove its validity.
The common law presumes mental capacity unless evidence suggests otherwise.
In disputed cases, the burden may shift back and forth between the propounder and objector.
Key Cases:
Scammell and Pharma (2008): Established that the common law test must apply.
Walker and Batman (2014): Recognized that MCA is not merely a restatement of prior tests but serves a different legal purpose.
Intention and Knowledge in Will Making
Necessary Intention: Testator must know and approve the contents of their will.
Presumption of Knowledge and Approval:
Presumed if the testator had capacity and executed the will.
Inferences can be drawn from suspicious circumstances, requiring further evidence.
Rebuttable Presumptions: Situations like blindness, illiteracy, or when the will is drafted by beneficiaries raise suspicion needing proof of intention and approval.
Golden Rule for Documenting Capacity
Golden Rule (Kenward v Adams, 1975): Highlights the essential need for documentation and evidence for the court.
Consequences of Non-Compliance: Lack of documentation may lead to disputes posthumously, impacting the will's validity.
Conclusion and Recap
Key Takeaway Points:
A testator must be over 18 and have mental capacity to understand the act of making a will.
The outline of mental capacity stems from both Banks and Goodfellow and MCA 2005.
Knowledge and approval are presumed, but certain circumstances may require additional documentation to overwhelm doubts.
Always consider seeking medical opinion to safeguard the validity of the will against potential disputes following the testator's death.