CC HY
HIGH-YIELD EXAM REVIEWER
Quality Assurance | Quality Control | Lean Six Sigma
THE BIG PICTURE — Know This First
Quality Management (broadest) → contains Quality Assurance → which uses Quality Control + Proficiency Testing + Staff as its 3 pillars.
Think of QA as a 3-legged stool: QC, Proficiency Testing, and Staff. Remove one leg and it falls.
QA vs QC — most testable distinction:
QA | QC | |
|---|---|---|
Phases | ALL 3 (pre, analytic, post) | Analytic ONLY |
Orientation | Process → prevents error | Product → detects error |
TOTAL TESTING PROCESS (TTP) — 3 Phases
Phase | Also Called | Key Steps |
|---|---|---|
Pre-Examination | Pre-analytical / Pre-test | Sample collection, patient prep, labeling, transport, storage |
Examination | Analytical / Test | Actual testing, reagents, result generation, QC, calibration |
Post-Examination | Post-analytical / Post-test | Result interpretation, pathologist validation, report dispatch, communication |
QUALITY CONTROL — Core Concepts
Definition: Systematic monitoring of analytic processes to detect errors and prevent incorrect results from being reported.
3 Objectives of QC:
Check machine stability
Check reagent quality
Check operator/technical errors
QC Material Requirements
Liquid (ready to use) OR lyophilized (freeze-dried → reconstitute with distilled water)
Same matrix as patient specimens (serum/plasma; human preferred, bovine acceptable)
Minimum 2 control levels (normal + abnormal; or low/normal/high)
Spans the clinically important range of the analyte
Types of Controls
Type | Key Feature |
|---|---|
Commercial Assayed | Has given ranges; more accurate; more expensive |
Commercial Unassayed | No values given; you calculate mean & SD; cheaper |
Specimen Pool | Human serum pooled; addresses artificial matrix concerns; less stable |
LEVEY-JENNINGS CHART & WESTGARD MULTI-RULES
Levey-Jennings Chart = most commonly used QC chart; plots control values over time against mean, ±1SD, ±2SD, ±3SD
Westgard Multi-Rules — THE Most Testable Table
Rule | Trigger | Error Type | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
1₂ₛ | 1 value exceeds ±2SD | WARNING only | Do not reject; increase vigilance |
1₃ₛ | 1 value exceeds ±3SD | Random | REJECT |
2₂ₛ | 2 consecutive values exceed +2SD or −2SD | Systematic | REJECT |
R₄ₛ | Range between 2 controls in same run >4SD | Random | REJECT |
4₁ₛ | 4 consecutive values exceed +1SD or −1SD | Systematic | REJECT |
10ₓ | 10 consecutive values on the same side of the mean | Systematic | REJECT |
Memory trick for error type:
1₃ₛ + R₄ₛ = Random (spike rules — one sudden jump or a wild range)
2₂ₛ + 4₁ₛ + 10ₓ = Systematic (drift rules — patterns over multiple values)
RANDOM vs. SYSTEMATIC ERROR
Random Error | Systematic Error | |
|---|---|---|
Affects | PRECISION | ACCURACY |
Direction | Unpredictable (+/−) | Consistently ONE direction |
Measured by | SD / imprecision | — |
Detected by | 1₃ₛ and R₄ₛ | 2₂ₛ, 4₁ₛ, 10ₓ |
Causes | Operator technique, instrument, reagent, environment | New reagent lot, new calibration, instrument/operator change |
Systematic Error Subtypes:
Constant error — same offset at every concentration
Proportional error — offset grows with concentration
SHIFT vs. TREND
Shift | Trend | |
|---|---|---|
Pattern | Abrupt jump to one side of mean | Slow, gradual movement in one direction |
Causes | New reagent lot, new calibration, sudden instrument/operator change | Slow lamp/bulb decay, gradual reagent deterioration, instrument drifting from calibration |
ESTABLISHING CONTROL LIMITS
Minimum 20 observations to set initial mean and SD
Exception: CV < 1% assays (e.g., arterial blood gases) → 5 days is adequate
QC results should ideally fall within ±2SD
Changing lot numbers with similar ranges → use new mean + previous SD
More data over time → average all data for best estimates
INTERNAL vs. EXTERNAL QC
Internal QC (Intralab) | External QC / Proficiency Testing (Interlab) | |
|---|---|---|
Frequency | Daily / per shift | Periodic (monthly, quarterly) |
Specimen | Known controls | Unknown specimens from external provider (NRL) |
Purpose | Detect errors during routine testing | Compare performance with peer laboratories |
Result release | Held until QC within limits | Tested as routine patient specimens |
PROFICIENCY TESTING (PT) — High-Yield Rules
Treated as routine patient specimens
Tested by bench staff on the primary analyzer
Secondary analyzers compared twice per year
No sharing of results until after deadline
Abnormalities resolved within 30 days
Failure Consequences
Offense | Consequence |
|---|---|
Fail PT for a specific test | Lose authority for that test only |
Violate any PT requirement | Lose full accreditation for all patient testing |
LEAN SIX SIGMA
Lean | Six Sigma | |
|---|---|---|
Goal | Eliminate waste | Eliminate variation/defects |
Core question | "Does this step need to exist?" | "How can this be improved?" |
DMAIC Framework
Step | Action |
|---|---|
Define | Identify the problem |
Measure | Collect data |
Analyze | Find root causes using statistical tools |
Improve | Re-engineer processes, optimize, standardize |
Control | Ongoing tracking with daily QC and Levey-Jennings |
Lean Waste Examples: waiting for specimens, searching for reagents, excess inventory, repeat testing, unnecessary paperwork, long walking distances
OUT-OF-CONTROL PROTOCOL (In Order)
Hold all patient results — never release while QC is out of control
Identify the likely error source (reagents, operator, instrument, environment, matrix effects such as hemolysis/lipemia)
Document the root cause and corrective action
Rerun QC to confirm resolution
Release patient results only after QC passes
Review results since last acceptable QC — repeat or recall if needed
RAPID-FIRE MUST-KNOWS
Question | Answer |
|---|---|
Most commonly used QC chart? | Levey-Jennings chart |
Minimum observations to set control limits? | 20 (or 5 for CV < 1%) |
Which rule is a WARNING, not rejection? | 1₂ₛ |
Which rules detect random error? | 1₃ₛ and R₄ₛ |
Which rules detect systematic error? | 2₂ₛ, 4₁ₛ, 10ₓ |
Random error affects which? | Precision |
Systematic error affects which? | Accuracy |
QA covers which phases? | All 3 (pre, analytic, post) |
QC covers which phase? | Analytic only |
PT external provider in PH? | NRL (National Reference Laboratory) |
Lean's core question? | "Does this step need to exist?" |
Six Sigma's core question? | "How can this be improved?" |
Shift vs. Trend? | Shift = sudden/abrupt; Trend = gradual/slow drift |
Unassayed vs. Assayed controls? | Unassayed has no given values; you calculate mean & SD; cheaper |