CC HY


HIGH-YIELD EXAM REVIEWER

Quality Assurance | Quality Control | Lean Six Sigma


THE BIG PICTURE — Know This First

Quality Management (broadest) → contains Quality Assurance → which uses Quality Control + Proficiency Testing + Staff as its 3 pillars.

Think of QA as a 3-legged stool: QC, Proficiency Testing, and Staff. Remove one leg and it falls.

QA vs QC — most testable distinction:

QA

QC

Phases

ALL 3 (pre, analytic, post)

Analytic ONLY

Orientation

Process → prevents error

Product → detects error


TOTAL TESTING PROCESS (TTP) — 3 Phases

Phase

Also Called

Key Steps

Pre-Examination

Pre-analytical / Pre-test

Sample collection, patient prep, labeling, transport, storage

Examination

Analytical / Test

Actual testing, reagents, result generation, QC, calibration

Post-Examination

Post-analytical / Post-test

Result interpretation, pathologist validation, report dispatch, communication


QUALITY CONTROL — Core Concepts

Definition: Systematic monitoring of analytic processes to detect errors and prevent incorrect results from being reported.

3 Objectives of QC:

  1. Check machine stability

  2. Check reagent quality

  3. Check operator/technical errors

QC Material Requirements

  • Liquid (ready to use) OR lyophilized (freeze-dried → reconstitute with distilled water)

  • Same matrix as patient specimens (serum/plasma; human preferred, bovine acceptable)

  • Minimum 2 control levels (normal + abnormal; or low/normal/high)

  • Spans the clinically important range of the analyte

Types of Controls

Type

Key Feature

Commercial Assayed

Has given ranges; more accurate; more expensive

Commercial Unassayed

No values given; you calculate mean & SD; cheaper

Specimen Pool

Human serum pooled; addresses artificial matrix concerns; less stable


LEVEY-JENNINGS CHART & WESTGARD MULTI-RULES

Levey-Jennings Chart = most commonly used QC chart; plots control values over time against mean, ±1SD, ±2SD, ±3SD

Westgard Multi-Rules — THE Most Testable Table

Rule

Trigger

Error Type

Action

1₂ₛ

1 value exceeds ±2SD

WARNING only

Do not reject; increase vigilance

1₃ₛ

1 value exceeds ±3SD

Random

REJECT

2₂ₛ

2 consecutive values exceed +2SD or −2SD

Systematic

REJECT

R₄ₛ

Range between 2 controls in same run >4SD

Random

REJECT

4₁ₛ

4 consecutive values exceed +1SD or −1SD

Systematic

REJECT

10ₓ

10 consecutive values on the same side of the mean

Systematic

REJECT

Memory trick for error type:

  • 1₃ₛ + R₄ₛ = Random (spike rules — one sudden jump or a wild range)

  • 2₂ₛ + 4₁ₛ + 10ₓ = Systematic (drift rules — patterns over multiple values)


RANDOM vs. SYSTEMATIC ERROR

Random Error

Systematic Error

Affects

PRECISION

ACCURACY

Direction

Unpredictable (+/−)

Consistently ONE direction

Measured by

SD / imprecision

Detected by

1₃ₛ and R₄ₛ

2₂ₛ, 4₁ₛ, 10ₓ

Causes

Operator technique, instrument, reagent, environment

New reagent lot, new calibration, instrument/operator change

Systematic Error Subtypes:

  • Constant error — same offset at every concentration

  • Proportional error — offset grows with concentration


SHIFT vs. TREND

Shift

Trend

Pattern

Abrupt jump to one side of mean

Slow, gradual movement in one direction

Causes

New reagent lot, new calibration, sudden instrument/operator change

Slow lamp/bulb decay, gradual reagent deterioration, instrument drifting from calibration


ESTABLISHING CONTROL LIMITS

  • Minimum 20 observations to set initial mean and SD

    • Exception: CV < 1% assays (e.g., arterial blood gases) → 5 days is adequate

  • QC results should ideally fall within ±2SD

  • Changing lot numbers with similar ranges → use new mean + previous SD

  • More data over time → average all data for best estimates


INTERNAL vs. EXTERNAL QC

Internal QC (Intralab)

External QC / Proficiency Testing (Interlab)

Frequency

Daily / per shift

Periodic (monthly, quarterly)

Specimen

Known controls

Unknown specimens from external provider (NRL)

Purpose

Detect errors during routine testing

Compare performance with peer laboratories

Result release

Held until QC within limits

Tested as routine patient specimens


PROFICIENCY TESTING (PT) — High-Yield Rules

  • Treated as routine patient specimens

  • Tested by bench staff on the primary analyzer

  • Secondary analyzers compared twice per year

  • No sharing of results until after deadline

  • Abnormalities resolved within 30 days

Failure Consequences

Offense

Consequence

Fail PT for a specific test

Lose authority for that test only

Violate any PT requirement

Lose full accreditation for all patient testing


LEAN SIX SIGMA

Lean

Six Sigma

Goal

Eliminate waste

Eliminate variation/defects

Core question

"Does this step need to exist?"

"How can this be improved?"

DMAIC Framework

Step

Action

Define

Identify the problem

Measure

Collect data

Analyze

Find root causes using statistical tools

Improve

Re-engineer processes, optimize, standardize

Control

Ongoing tracking with daily QC and Levey-Jennings

Lean Waste Examples: waiting for specimens, searching for reagents, excess inventory, repeat testing, unnecessary paperwork, long walking distances


OUT-OF-CONTROL PROTOCOL (In Order)

  1. Hold all patient results — never release while QC is out of control

  2. Identify the likely error source (reagents, operator, instrument, environment, matrix effects such as hemolysis/lipemia)

  3. Document the root cause and corrective action

  4. Rerun QC to confirm resolution

  5. Release patient results only after QC passes

  6. Review results since last acceptable QC — repeat or recall if needed


RAPID-FIRE MUST-KNOWS

Question

Answer

Most commonly used QC chart?

Levey-Jennings chart

Minimum observations to set control limits?

20 (or 5 for CV < 1%)

Which rule is a WARNING, not rejection?

1₂ₛ

Which rules detect random error?

1₃ₛ and R₄ₛ

Which rules detect systematic error?

2₂ₛ, 4₁ₛ, 10ₓ

Random error affects which?

Precision

Systematic error affects which?

Accuracy

QA covers which phases?

All 3 (pre, analytic, post)

QC covers which phase?

Analytic only

PT external provider in PH?

NRL (National Reference Laboratory)

Lean's core question?

"Does this step need to exist?"

Six Sigma's core question?

"How can this be improved?"

Shift vs. Trend?

Shift = sudden/abrupt; Trend = gradual/slow drift

Unassayed vs. Assayed controls?

Unassayed has no given values; you calculate mean & SD; cheaper