Umemoto _On Strike San Francisco..._ 1989

San Francisco State College Strike

Creative Expression During the Strike

  • The San Francisco State College strike ignited a creative spirit among students, particularly in the Asian American arts movement.

  • AAPA member Janice Mirikitani became a pivotal figure, co-founding the Third World Communications Collective and the Third World Women’s Collective.

  • They also helped publish Aim, one of the first Asian American journals.

Controversy Surrounding Leadership

  • Late 1968, S. I. Hayakawa was appointed president, causing unrest, particularly within the Japanese American community, leading to protests against him.

  • Some community members believed in civil liberties and the importance of speaking out against injustices, partly influenced by historical lessons from the eviction past.

  • Approximately 100 Japanese Americans expressed support for the striking students during a community meeting in December 1968.

The Third World Liberation Front (TWLF)

  • Closer relations among Third World students increased ideological development among Asian Americans, emphasizing solidarity among minority groups.

  • The TWLF's formation was encouraged by Juan Martinez, a history lecturer, uniting various organizations like ICSA and AAPA.

  • TWLF aimed to foster Third World consciousness against institutional racism and oppression.

TWLF Demands
  1. Right to Education:

    • Advocated for open admissions and an end to biased standardized tests affecting minority students’ access to education.

    • Organizing efforts led to substantial recruitment of high school students for college admissions.

  2. Ethnic Area Studies:

    • Called for a school focused on relevant education addressing minority issues and history in a meaningful way to their communities.

  3. Control Over Ethnic Studies:

    • Demanded that ethnic studies be taught by those sharing the experiences of the respective ethnic groups, promoting self-determination.

Resistance and Challenges

  • The increasing vigor of student demands faced significant administrative resistance, particularly under Chancellor Dumke who sought university neutrality.

  • A notable sit-in organized in May 1968 resulted in some incremental concessions, but intensified state repression followed.

  • Rising tensions led to higher policing and an escalation in confrontation tactics among students, reflecting dissatisfaction with existing protest methods.

Internal Divisions and Tactics

  • Disunity emerged within the TWLF, with notable tensions arising from differing strategies and goals among participating groups.

  • The BSU developed a democratic centralism structure to counteract immature factional dynamics and ensure adherence to shared principles.

  • Strategies like "heightening contradictions" were used to prepare the broader student body for more confrontational actions against the administration.

Escalation and Police Response

  • The firing of George Murray, a faculty member, acted as a catalyst for renewed clashes, as students called for a strike on November 6.

  • Students engaged in disruptive protests, which were met with police violence, limiting community support and increasing public scrutiny.

  • A series of violent incidents against students led many to reevaluate their strategies and the implications of police engagement in campus affairs.

Negotiations and Outcomes

  • As tensions continued, the administration’s resistance necessitated negotiations despite the strike's initial demands.

  • The TWLF eventually reached a compromise regarding the establishment of the School of Ethnic Studies, though many demands remained unmet.

  • Despite the challenges, students laid the foundation for ethnic studies programs and built stronger community ties and a commitment to social change.

Long-Term Impact and Legacy

  • The strike affected activist trajectories, with many Asian student leaders pursuing community-oriented careers or degrees to influence systemic reform.

  • Activists emphasized a commitment to addressing social inequities rather than simple reformist approaches.

  • The legacy of the strike fosters ongoing advocacy for ethnic studies, promotes community engagement to maintain political influence, and informs future generations of Asian American activists.