Human Rights and Social Justice - Lecture Notes
Human Rights and Social Justice
Introduction
Human rights documents and discourses often link human rights and social justice.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) includes justice among human rights, covering procedural and distributive justice.
Examples from UDHR:
Article 7: Equal protection against discrimination (ensuring everyone is treated the same under the law, regardless of race, gender, religion, etc.).
Article 10: Procedural justice (right to a fair trial and impartial tribunal).
Article 21.2: Equal access to public service (all citizens should have the same opportunities to work in government positions).
Article 21.3: Democratic rights (the right to vote and participate in the political process).
Article 23.2: Equal pay for equal work (men and women should receive the same compensation for performing the same job).
Article 23.3: Right to just remuneration (fair wages that allow workers and their families to live a decent life).
Article 26: Educational and opportunity rights (access to education and opportunities for personal and professional development).
These aims are reiterated in other international documents and by human rights advocacy groups.
The dominant philosophical view sees human rights and social justice as distinct normative domains.
Social justice requires greater distributive equality than human rights, except for constitutionally essential civil and political rights.
This dominant view presents a discontinuous conception: social justice includes human rights but contains a further conception of equality rights that are not human rights.
The Discontinuous Conception
Charles Jones frames the dominant view: social justice includes further specifications on the range of legitimate inequality of basic goods that are compatible with universal rights protections.
This paper challenges the discontinuous view and proposes a normative model where human rights overlap more fully with egalitarian social justice.
The reformed model is political, based on current human rights practice (institutional and discursive elements).
Normative model: reconstructed account of norms and ideals implicit in practices.
Current human rights practice is emergent and contested, with disagreement over basic norms and values.
The development of human rights practice reflects a growing convergence on the egalitarian understanding of social justice.
Goal: outline an account of how social justice and human rights increasingly share normative space based on membership in a political society, functioning at different levels to protect against exclusions from that status.
Dominant Philosophical View
Social justice is characterized as a strongly egalitarian norm.
Ronald Dworkin: all plausible political philosophy is egalitarian, with theories of social justice evaluated by their correspondence to the idea that people are equals.
Members of a political society are entitled to equal respect and consideration in the design and administration of political institutions.
Kymlicka refers to an egalitarian plateau in contemporary political philosophy.
Egalitarian theories of social justice require significant distributive equality, like John Rawls’ equal distributions of primary goods.This emphasis on equality raises important questions about how to achieve a fair distribution of resources and opportunities, which is essential for fostering a just society.