Police History
Political Model
Primary Agents & Duties
- Sheriff/Constable
- The “Watch”
- Slave patrols, private detectives/security, frontier security forces (TX Rangers)
- CITIZENS are primary agents of social control
Political Era – English Heritage
- Primary Features From England
- Local Control
- Decentralized/Fragmented System
- Three Elements of Modern Policing (England)
- Mission? (implied focus on prevention)
- Strategy? (implied patrol patterns and prevention efforts)
- Organizational Structure? (paramilitary tendencies)
Political Era – English Heritage (continued details)
- Primary Features From England
- Local Control
- Decentralized/Fragmented System
- Three Elements of Modern Policing (England)
- Mission – Crime Prevention
- Strategy – Random patrolling on foot
- Organizational Structure – Paramilitary
First Modern-Day Police
- Took a long time to develop in the US
- Why?
- $1900s$ (timeframe label) context: (early modern policing delayed)
First Modern-Day Police – Why development was slow (expanded)
- Reasons for delay
- $Lack of need in rural society; urbanization = police$ (urban areas required formal policing)
- Fear of a National Police Force
- Political Fights for Control (State and Local)
- Current struggle in DC for control of metropolitan PD
- Implementation of National Guard in Washington
- Taxes to Pay
Changing American Landscape
- Industrial revolution created urbanization – Relationship between population dynamics & crime
- Increasing representation of immigrant groups – Minority threat hypothesis
- Lack of informal social controls through collective efficacy
- Prevalence of effective firearms in US society – Armed state powers
Policing in the Political Era
- Inefficient characteristics
- Foot
- Unsupervised
- Little communication
- Expansive Role
- Brutal
- Corrupt
- Battle for control
- Selection issues
- No Personnel Standards
- No training
- Pay to play
- Fired at will
- Great pay
Professional Model
Features / Elements
- Eliminate Politics – Response to Corruption
- Increase Personnel Standards – Training, Education
- Provide Adequate Leaders
- Specialization
- Centralize Command – Supervision ramped up – Discipline (punishment) is the only tool
Technology Drove the Movement
- Patrol Car
- Two-way Radio
- Telephone
- Outcome:
- Rounded out service
- Increased demand and expectation of service
Challenges and Disconnects
- US government increases funding for education and training – Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA)
- Law enforcement orientation burdens communities of color – Civil unrest, complaints, and lawsuits
- Crime rate increases consistently from $1960$-$1994$ – Inconsistent with public expectations
Community Policing – A Response to the Professionalism Movement
Rationale
- “Law Enforcement” focus alienated citizens
- Treatment during Professional Model = unrest
- Kerner Commission reform recommendations
CP – Features
- Focus on citizen (no monopoly) – Increase Police-Citizen contact – Rely on citizens for crime control
- Return to a broad role – Emphasize service and problem solving
- Specialization (generalists) – De-emphasize crime fighting
CP Approaches
- Community organizing (Chicago model)
- Problem-solving (Goldstein)
- Aggressive order maintenance (Broken Windows)