Scientific Foundations of Psychology
PART 2: RESEARCH METHODS: THINKING CRITICALLY WITH PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
- Psychology and Its History
Psychology uses its research to separate uninformed opinions from examined conclusions.
Three roadblocks to critical thinking are hindsight bias, overconfidence, and perceiving patterns in random events-help illustrate why we cannot rely solely on common sense.
Hindsight biased (also known as i knew it all along phenomenon).
- Overconfidence
We humans tend to think we known more than we actually do. We tend to be more confident than correct when responding to a question.
- Perceiving Order in Random Events
In random data we often find patterns, random sequences often don’t appear like random to us.
The SCIENTIFIC METHOD AND DESCRIPTION
- The scientific method
The scientific method is a self-correcting process for evaluating ideas with observations and analysis. It welcomes hunches and plausible sounding theories and puts them to the test. If a theory works, the data supports its prediction. If it fails (theory) it either gets revised or rejected.
A good theory produces testable predictions called hypotheses.
- Methods
Descriptive: Describes behaviors, often by using case studies, surveys, or naturalistic observations
Correlational: Associate different factors or variables (anything that contributes to a result)
Experimental: Manipulate variables to discover their effects
- case studies
- naturalistic observations
- surveys and interviews
- Naturalistic Observation
Records behavior in natural environments, doesn’t explain behavior but describes it.
- Surveys
Observes several cases in less depth, asking people to report their behavior or opinion.
- wording effects
- random sampling
- Review