From Articles of Confederation to the U.S. Constitution & Bill of Rights
Crisis Under the Articles of Confederation
- Post-war decade ( 1780s ) marked by:
- National debt, collapsing credit, worthless Continental currency.
- Inter-state quarrels over tariffs, river tolls, western lands, & citizenship rights.
- No executive branch, no independent judiciary, Congress unable to tax or enforce its own measures.
- Alexander Hamilton’s summary in Federalist No. 15 ( 1787 ):
- “We may indeed with propriety be said to have reached almost the last stage of national humiliation…”
- Wheels of government "arrested," the edifice "ready to fall upon our heads."
Philosophical Re-evaluation
- Early Revolution inspired by John Locke → minimal government, optimistic view of human nature.
- Federalists’ 1780s experience produced a darker, Hobbes-like outlook:
- Human “passions” need constraint or society devolves into “war of all against all” (Hobbes, Leviathan).
- Liberty requires order; order requires a capable central authority.
- Key distinction:
- Jeffersonian / Lockean camp = trust voluntary virtue, fear central power.
- Federalist camp = trust structure & checks, fear unregulated passion.
- Mount Vernon Conference ( 1785 ): VA & MD coordinate Chesapeake navigation, hosted by Washington.
- Annapolis Convention ( Sept. 1786 ): only 6 states; Alexander Hamilton calls for a general convention.
- Shay’s Rebellion ( 1786−87, not detailed in transcript but context) dramatizes need for change.
- Philadelphia Convention summoned for May 1787 to “revise” Articles—quickly decides to scrap them.
Players at Philadelphia ( May–Sept. 1787 )
- President of Convention: George Washington.
- Intellectual engine: James Madison (library of histories from Jefferson; “history is the great oracle of truth”).
- Aged statesman & conciliator: Benjamin Franklin ( 81 ).
The Virginia Plan ( Large-State Plan )
- Authored by Madison, presented by Edmund Randolph.
- Proposals:
- 3 distinct branches—legislative, executive, judiciary.
- Bicameral congress:
- Lower House chosen directly by proportional population districts.
- Upper House chosen by Lower House.
- Federal negative on state laws that violate the Constitution.
- Federal officials paid from a national treasury.
The New Jersey Plan ( Small-State Plan )
- Author: William Paterson.
- Retains unicameral legislature with equal state vote.
- Accepts separate executive & judiciary but safeguards state sovereignty.
Hamilton’s “British Model” Speech
- Wants lifetime president & senators, presidential appointment of governors, full veto of state laws.
- Too monarchical → ignored but highlights spectrum of opinion.
Core Debates Inside the Convention
- Representation: people vs. states, large vs. small.
- Term lengths:
- Madison initially proposes 3-year representatives, 7-year senators; New Englanders favor annual elections.
- Popular participation:
- Roger Sherman (CT) – distrusts mass politics (“people constantly liable to be misled”).
- George Mason (VA) – insists lower house be “grand depository” of democratic principle.
- Executive election: by Congress → reconsidered → Electoral College compromise; talk of one-term 7 yrs → ends at 4-yr term, re-eligible.
- Federal power over commerce & interstate disputes.
The Slavery Question & Compromises
- Moral & economic divide:
- VA & MD tobacco regions have excess slaves → support banning importation (George Mason, Luther Martin).
- Deep South (SC, GA) demands perpetual slave trade.
- Outcomes:
- Atlantic slave trade untouchable by Congress for 20 yrs (ban ultimately enacted 1808).
- Word “slavery” excluded from text for moral optics.
- 53 Compromise: census counts 60% of enslaved population for representation & taxation → boosts Southern seats & Electoral College weight.
The Great (Connecticut) Compromise
- Brokers: Roger Sherman & Oliver Ellsworth.
- Bicameral solution:
- House of Representatives → proportional to population, sole originator of bills(“notaxationwithoutrepresentation”).</li><li>Senate→equalvote(2perstate).</li></ul></li></ul><h3id="finishedconstitutionsigneddd9171787dd">FinishedConstitution(Signed9/17/1787 )
- All delegates sign except:
- Elbridge Gerry (MA)
- Edmund Randolph (VA)
- George Mason (VA)
- Franklin’s tempered endorsement: accept “with all its faults” because good administration > perfect form; warns of eventual despotism if people become corrupt.
- Madison departs uneasy—lacks explicit federal veto on state laws; hopes judiciary will fill gap.
Ratification Mechanics
- Strategy: bypass state legislatures; use special popular conventions → Constitution derives authority directly from “We the People,” not from states.
- Required threshold: 9of13 states.
Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists
- Federalists (Hamilton, Madison, Jay, Washington, Franklin, Adams):
- Union essential for liberty & security.
- U.S. geographically blessed—rivers, ports, resources, mostly Protestant English-speakers (Jay).
- Need taxing power, single currency, regular army & navy.
- Anti-Federalists (Patrick Henry, George Clinton, Samuel Adams, Mercy Otis Warren, many frontier farmers & some planters):
- Fear consolidated national power & potential aristocracy.
- Object to no Bill of Rights, possible standing army, federal courts over states, indirect representation (Senate, Electoral College).
- Local elites protective of state prerogatives.
Ratification Timeline
| # | State | Date | Vote Context |
|---|
| 1</td><td>Delaware</td><td>12/7/1787</td><td>Unanimous</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Pennsylvania</td><td>12/12/1787</td><td>Urban−ruralsplit</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>NewJersey</td><td>12/18/1787</td><td>Commercialbacking</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Georgia</td><td>1/2/1788</td><td>Frontierdefensemotive</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Connecticut</td><td>1/9/1788</td><td>“ConstitutionState”</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>Massachusetts</td><td>2/6/1788</td><td>ConditionalonfutureBillofRights</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>Maryland</td><td>4/26/1788</td><td>63{-}11for</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>SouthCarolina</td><td>5/23/1788 | Rice & indigo export worries |
| 9</td><td>NewHampshire</td><td>6/21/1788</td><td>MakesConstitutionoperative</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>Virginia</td><td>6/25/1788</td><td>Madisonvs.Henry;close</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>NewYork</td><td>7/26/1788</td><td>Swingof46{-}19anti→passesby3 votes; aided by Federalist Papers & massive “Federal Ship Hamilton” parade ( 27\,\text{ft}long,13salutes).</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>NorthCarolina</td><td>11/21/1789</td><td>WaitsforBillofRights</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>RhodeIsland</td><td>5/29/1790</td><td>Passesby2votes;lasthold−out</td></tr></tbody></table><h3id="firstfederalgovernment">FirstFederalGovernment</h3><ul><li>Temporarycapital:NewYorkCity.</li><li>GeorgeWashingtonunanimouslyelected,inaugurated4/30/1789 on Federal Hall balcony. |
- Congress quickly organizes executive departments & judiciary (detailed next lecture).
Birth of the Bill of Rights
- Political back-story:
- VA Governor Patrick Henry gerrymanders district to block James Madison.
- Madison campaigns against James Monroe; pledges to sponsor amendments protecting civil liberties.
- Wins election 1,308−to−972.</li></ul></li><li>Madisonspeech6/8/1789:promises“additions…thatwillnotinjuretheConstitution”butreassureskeptics.</li><li>Objectives:<ul><li>PlacateAnti−Federalists;convertthemintoloyaloppositionratherthansecessionistfaction.</li><li>Clarifythatfederalpowerhasexplicitlimits;preservefoundingideals.</li></ul></li><li>Drafted17Houseamendments→Senaterefinesto12→Statesratifyfirst10astheBillofRights(effective12/15/1791$$).
Key Takeaways & Significance
- Articles’ failure nudged leaders from Lockean optimism to pragmatic (almost Hobbesian) federalism.
- Philadelphia Convention produced an innovative mixed republic via layered compromises—representation, sovereignty, slavery.
- Ratification battle fostered America’s first national political communications campaign (Federalist Papers, broadsides, parades).
- Adoption of Bill of Rights demonstrated capacity for peaceful amendment & reconciliation among fierce ideological foes.
- Foundations now set for emerging party politics & constitutional interpretation (to be explored in subsequent lecture).